@Stalker1stVFW:

Most important, keep it non-arcade 😉

what does this mean? nothing about BMS is arcade.

And why that, mate, please?

At least you tried. Thanks for sharing, instead.
And keep on trying to create something new and original too, most of all.
We all know how much it may be hard, but some day you will succeed in finding your own way, and you’ll be happy with it!
Even better, you might wanto to lear how to create a campaign… (hint)

With best compliments and regards.

Thanks RD
That worked
Happy New Year!

Ground-Attack 105th TFS “Kestrels” is commencing operations on JOSEON - Requesting A-A/SEAD support

https://105tfs.weebly.com/

Discord link in website frontpage.

PHASE 1: RED LOBBY I – frontline support North SEOUL
PHASE 2: ALLEY PANTHER IV – open highway & AAA-free corridor to ONSAN
PHASE 3: ALLEY PANTHER V – open highways & AAA-free corridor to PYONYANG

PHASE I - Operation Red Lobby I
Main objective: attack enemy forces frontline North of SEOUL, attrit and halt enemy advance;
Mission Objectives:
• TRACK 1
◦ neutralize AAA/SAMs with DEAD/AAA HUNT missions
• TRACK 2
◦ interdict vehicles;
◦ Strike: DEPOTS @ bulls 265.54 350.66; ARMY BASES 243.72 26.46 307.21; TAEBUKPO AIRSTRIP 264.52; CHORWON RADAR 273.43
◦ CAS/FAC(A) missions;
Area of Operations AO: connect the bullseye points: 241.77 206.24 317.17 272.67

After RED LOBBY I, the opening up of Highway to ONSAN will start with ALLEY PANTHER IV, after that highway and AAA-free corridor is established, ALLEY PANTHER V starts with same objectives on highways towards PYONGYANG.

105th TFS is a Ground-Attack specialized squadron, and as such we rely on Air-to-Air Support and SEAD support from other squadrons/pilots, contact us to coordinate and know when we are launching missions.

About opening up corridors: one of the missions of this squadron is to open corridors for squadrons launching deeper strikes to have an area with reduced threats where that may help with the ingress/egress at low-level, typically these CORRIDORS are aimed at strategic objectives, if you are planning a deep strike mission, contact us to consider a AAA-hunt/DEAD mission prior to your assault.

We have a TARCAP re-join SOP for those interested: https://pdfhost.io/v/eottzliqT_advisory_squadrons_joining_missions_105thTFSpdf.pdf

Forum link for those interested: https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?40446-How-to-join-our-squadron-missions-as-support-TARCAP-or-SEAD

Hope to see you in the “air” soon, and that we can have support to allow us to Interdict, Support friendly Ground Forces, and Neutralize the enemy ground-forces, and Open Corridors for squadrons launching deeper strikes to have an area with reduced threats where that may help with the ingress/egress at low-level.

Welcome to our first Dogfight Bash 2021!

We invite 32 pilots to participate for the Dogfight Tournament “Dogfight Bash 2021” at January 2nd 2021, 1800z.

Click HERE for more information.

Sign in HERE!

Stay safe and happy holidays!
Micro

On 17/12/20 the last event of the exercise took place.

I want to thank all the participants who flew with 320 e-haf. We had valuable lessons learned regarding admin, tactics, and standard operations procedures.
Flying and coordinating with so many aircraft was a great experience and I believe that we provide a quiet “as real as it gets” environment.

I assure you that next year the exercise is going to be far better and all squadrons should participate in order to exchange our knowledge and experience.

Last but not least, I want to thank the members of e-haf (they know) who helped to organize and make true this exercise.

Once again thank you all!!! See you next year!!! Merry Christmas and a happy new year to everybody!

@DUSTOFF17:

Not sure why he didn’t reply lol but I’ve flown CAS with Morg as a FAC(A) and keyhole procedures were implemented very well.
It was pretty neat, without ever having flown together or even talked on discord or anything I checked in with him UHF on the Falcon Events 24/7 campaign last month, we then executed a textbook CAS engagement and I RTB’d. Good fun.

Oh good! Very nice.

I completely agree that there should be some standardized form or data template available for flight ops within squadrons and squadrons/wings or any group of players to play with other groups. I see this happening a lot, and a standardized means to share mission plans/briefings would be great.

I think these are excellent points you bring up here, and we shouldn’t just stop there. I think WDP would also provide a useful reference to consider what data fields should be present. A lot could be added for package coordination, for instance, to that list just off the top of my head. If I come up with a more worthy list, I’ll come back and post it.

Finally, I could see an MS Word template where you can substitute your own logo there going a long way. Export to PDF from word (there’s an option in there for it under the File Menu) and distribute it to pilots.

Hey all I am searching an attachment uploaded screenshot-diagram here in the forum about MAR-MOR, HUSKY, Cheapshot

When the aircraft gets MAR or pitbull turn, I can not find it !!!

Thanks for setting this up, Micro. Stellar work as usual 🙂

All the best,

Uwe

I don’t know if this could help, but I created a TE and chose two su-27’s in training roles, and when I tried to attack them they simply turned away and kind of ran away from me, as if they were trying to avoid me. It was interesting!

Hey guys!!

See the post above and check in!! 🙂
We need some more competitors.

@Icer:

Thanks Oak, I did get on there but i’m a bit flummoxed by “Discord” in general. At first it wanted my info (i’m already on Discord) but kept rejecting because i’m already registered. Signed in with 2nd email I have and got in. Then I couldn’t select my experience level (figured base beginner was the best bet regardless of my limited BMS experience), got frustrated and put it aside.

If I figure Discord out a bit I may try that also, just seems like a lot of BS going on there and all I want to do is fly/learn/have fun…

At FL just go to the pilot_skill_rating channel and select your skill (click on the bottom) and you get access to all the MP flight channels

Is there anywhere / any VFW who have TE’s that they share?
I only fly solo (non MP) and I find campaign a bit overwhelming, the AI wingmen are not bad, but not great either.

There is a flaw in your reasonning
IMHO if a VFW publish their TE (like we do) they might be made for MP and different flyers.
You can’t really expect a TE to remain enjoyable for 6 guys if it can be flown by a single guy.
I mean usually the TE objective are adapted according to number of pilots.

Replacing these human pilots with AI is quite a very good recept for disaster 🙂

But anyway, our TE’s are open and listed here: https://www.viperdrivers.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=18

Today we releases the second mission for “Operation Vacuity”.

Date: September 13th 2020, 1730z

This will be an regular campaign based on several TE missions.

Grab your seat in the ATO (first mission July 24th) and check the BRIEFING material.

Cheers
Micro

Ps. Here is the Briefing and Debriefing from the first mission (I missed it to post it here:blowpar:)

Hello
Version 2 with Following fixes / additions :

Fixed timing / speed for Lightning 2 flight Fixed VHF frequency table Updated AI flights timings Added 3 Ship C-160 flight

URL : https://1drv.ms/u/s!AuNkk9VUA8G3rXyWXSACedE53fkL?e=ThDXo7

Hello,
Just to make sure. To get the flight hours counted you must convert the *.trn to *.tac (simply rename).
Additional benefit: you can edit the “training” TE-mission (e.g. I set the time to start the training mission with a cold and dark Viper).
Have a great evening,
Tweety

@Jackal:

That’s just what I’d call an advanced training level indeed, dear Uwe :lol:
Couldn’t agree more.

BUT… a crazy idea is running straight in my head: and why not to replicate it in another theater, hhmmmm?

With best regards.

I think so far for every theater I fly or flew half-way regularly (KTO, Aegean, EMF and Balkans) I created quick AAR training scenarios… I don’t remember sharing them all, though 🙂

All the best,

Uwe

Please don’t worry, dear John, I can understand you well… you replied at least, and this only counts.

With best regards.

Gianni.

@LorikEolmin:

What I wrote is still valid though.

Ya smart by-pass way to “cross-check”