Sure we need 4.33?
-
People have been saying this since 2000, and we are still going strong!!!
-
+1
-
Well I can tell you when the DCS hardcore Bug and CV ops comes out, that’s where you will find me.
go fly in empty sterile environment like it is the case since flanker 1.5? no thanks
besides leaving falcon for a so shitty ac than the f18… you disapoint me Mower
about the original post ? Bms full of bugs… yes but not more than any other simulators i know…
and yes believe me there is plenty of room for improvment.
by the way buddha if you think Bms is so full of bugs, outdated and with no future, why the F are you spending time here ?
-
I dont want do criticism guys…i am curious to know what you think about…we have a fantastic simulator in our hands but if the 4.33 wont be stunning i think that lot of people will abandon this sim and we have another kill in our small registry of good simulators…i am thinking about terrain for example…it need a great improvement or iff and other avionics missing…wingmen …improving of dynamic campaign…there is a lot of work to do and i think that engine has its limits…
-
I dont want do criticism guys…i am curious to know what you think about…we have a fantastic simulator in our hands but if the 4.33 wont be stunning i think that lot of people will abandon this sim and we have another kill in our small registry of good simulators…i am thinking about terrain for example…it need a great improvement or iff and other avionics missing…wingmen …improving of dynamic campaign…there is a lot of work to do and i think that engine has its limits…
the only limit is the imagination and time of the coders
-
Hi to all i want to express my doubts about the new version of falcon…1 we are all agree that its dynamic campaign and avionic reproduction is one of the best atm in flight sims but…i have the sensation that if the developers can not do a miracle the old sweet falcon is about to death…it is a product of 99 and full of bugs i recently flown with vrs tacpack and eagle dynamics series and i have to say that probably those products have a great possibilities to grow…i love falcon for his dynamic campaign but probably if others two have it i will leave immediately my loved sim…so what you think about? I am scared that we have reached maximum developement of our great sim
Funny but most of this comment is true about DCS… Regardless what promotes ED DCS still even based on Lock On which was a Flanker 2.0 derivative which is almost same old as Falcon 4.0…
As I see will be things what DCS never will be capable comparing to F4. For ex. giving random tacical environment without demanding a single min. from player to create it… -
This post is deleted! -
I dont want do criticism guys…i am curious to know what you think about…we have a fantastic simulator in our hands but if the 4.33 wont be stunning i think that lot of people will abandon this sim and we have another kill in our small registry of good simulators…i am thinking about terrain for example…it need a great improvement or iff and other avionics missing…wingmen …improving of dynamic campaign…there is a lot of work to do and i think that engine has its limits…
You think too much ?
-
To each his or her own.
Falcon-4 My Sim of choice. -
-
I agree with you molnibalage…dynamic campaign is and will be a masterpiece.in all flight sim history…i am only worried about physiological limits of falcon s code…about dcs is also true but they had a lot of people working full time to improve the sim… but imagine…if you delete dynqmic campaign to falcon…we have a product that is light ages behind others out there…
-
Thread closed as per the forum rules. Buddha you have been warned before and you still keep trolling the fora with provocative posts.