Dead zone question
-
New Warthog owner with a Quick question regarding Warthog stick dead zones: it looks like everything I’ve read about the BMS FLCS modeling suggests no user dead zones and linear mapping, but in the BMS UI controller setup, I think the dead zone defaults to small? Does this need to be changed to none? Is there anything built in to TARGET that I need to undo?
-
I’ve put them to none, like I did in 4.32… it’give you immediate response from the stick which is nice when refueling and such.
-
try between small and none. the warthog is precise so little deadzone should be ok. sometimes no deadzone means its too jaggy, for example in track ir, you want to have deadzone otherwise your head will move with the slightes movement.
-
I also have a joystick dead zone issue. I’ve got a CH Flightstick that I’ve modified to be floor mounted. I’m using a BU0836 controller and have it configured with no dead zones on my x and y axis’ and I’ve verified that this is the case by looking at the controller axis data display. No deadzones from the controller. I also have “no dead zones” selected in F4 BMS 4.33 Advanced configuration window. However, I still get a dead zone in Falcon. I’ve verified this when flying and by carefully observing the Falcon BMS joystick calibration display in the settup menu. When I slowly move the stick it registers a slight deadzone right in the middle of the pitch and roll axis’. Is there a way to get rid of this?
-
During early dev of the sidestick controller for the F16 it seems they set a"…… breakoutforce of no more then 1lb and no less"
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a085085.pdf
A deadzone set to small seems to be a pretty good simulated break-out force.
: If the dev of the flight model have stated somewhere here that the response should be without any deadzone, then I definitly would trust that above all else. Has he?
Cheers!
/Jaws
-
During early dev of the sidestick controller for the F16 it seems they set a"…… breakoutforce of no more then 1lb and no less"
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a085085.pdf
A deadzone set to small seems to be a pretty good simulated break-out force.
: If the dev of the flight model have stated somewhere here that the response should be without any deadzone, then I definitly would thrust that above all else. Has he?
Cheers!
/Jaws
yes he has