Airbase Ops
-
BMS really stands out for its ATC system. It really works, and since the very first Falcon 4.0 it was, for me, a very nice and realistic touch.
It woudl be great if the ATC could use the published approach and departure procedures, so you could merge following charts and ATC.For now I follow the charts sometimes, other times I follow ATC. I enjoy both
-
I donāt think Iāve ever used vectors. Even in 4.32 I simply ignored the instructions and flew the overhead in VMC or flew the plates in IMC.
-
If the airport for landing has published charts, always by them. A good attention to the ATC for inbound/outbound traffic as also attention to instruments for possible near flights.
Nikos. -
If you ignore ore vectors and land without permission, does it affect mission rating etc?
-
Iāve never seen such a consistently close pollā¦
-
The only problem with autonomous approach is during the Campaign. When you come back from a large package, if you do an autonomous approach most likely youāll be asked to do missed approach because there are so many flights taking off / landing. They clear you in and once you get close they abort. Sometimes getting vectors is easier to get down.
Not sure if it reflects mission rating, I donāt think so.
-
It woudl be great if the ATC could use the published approach and departure procedures, so you could merge following charts and ATC.
This will be effective post 4.33.x ā¦
If you ignore ore vectors and land without permission, does it affect mission rating etc?
Would be a good idea ā¦
-
This will be effective post 4.33.x ā¦
Yummy!
-
If itās IFR: vectors to final for an ILS. Doing a full approach isnāt worth the effort
VFR then to initial for the overhead.
-
The only problem with autonomous approach is during the Campaign. When you come back from a large package, if you do an autonomous approach most likely youāll be asked to do missed approach because there are so many flights taking off / landing. They clear you in and once you get close they abort. Sometimes getting vectors is easier to get down.
Not sure if it reflects mission rating, I donāt think so.
Yup, and the AI flight members freak out to. I was at 32nm out, and I requested an approach. Tower said I was too far out and to contact them at 30nm. As soon as I hit 30nm, #2 decided to request landing and turn immediately right, causing a colission and explosion. It was after an other very successfully mission, so I was not impressed! haha
-
1. I donāt usually fly with AI
2. If I do, I get them to RTB once weāre close to base
3. I then land behind them or if clear, declare an emergency
4. If I canāt be bothered, I just do an OHB. I get told off by tower so often itās like a āwelcome back!ā message -
1. I donāt usually fly with AI
2. If I do, I get them to RTB once weāre close to base
3. I then land behind them or if clear, declare an emergency
4. If I canāt be bothered, I just do an OHB. I get told off by tower so often itās like a āwelcome back!ā messageThis basically defines the concerns, or rather queries, I had about the tower and AI. Hopefully future releases may make these work better together
-
Yup, and the AI flight members freak out to. I was at 32nm out, and I requested an approach. Tower said I was too far out and to contact them at 30nm. As soon as I hit 30nm, #2 decided to request landing and turn immediately right, causing a colission and explosion. It was after an other very successfully mission, so I was not impressed! haha
P, what I do may help with that , at least. When I hit 30 miles Iāll tell the AI wingie to RTB. Then after he/she does itās thing Iāll call approach. I generally go autonomous as I fly Hornets and the Pattern is something I like to practice.
I have noticed, fairly frequently, that as I am doing so ATC is calling missed approach on others behind me. I assume Iām bumping AI out of the pattern. However, as I believe DJ wrote, I take responsibility to watch traffic around me.