Thrustmaster cougar gimbal cage sheared.
-
…could give these 3D printed parts a try, just to try. Shame he doesn’t offer them in metal, which this printing house can do…but I imagine they’d cost too much.
http://www.shapeways.com/product/KTM9G6PGC/cougar-1?optionId=61311029&li=marketplace
http://www.shapeways.com/product/TZKFUHE2L/cougar-2?optionId=61311346&li=marketplace
http://www.shapeways.com/product/T5XTBE6NH/cougar-3?optionId=61311101&li=marketplace
http://www.shapeways.com/product/7X4SAB5N7/cougar-4?optionId=61311382&li=marketplace
“Strong and flexible”. Well which one is it? I’d hate for them to flex as that would just translate is slop which I’m assuming this mod is aiming to eradicate.
Also, all parts added together come to ~£70. Unless it is very good and not prone to developing slop, I’d much rather put that £70 towards an FSSB, personally.
-
“Strong and flexible”. Well which one is it? I’d hate for them to flex as that would just translate is slop which I’m assuming this mod is aiming to eradicate.
Also, all parts added together come to ~£70. Unless it is very good and not prone to developing slop, I’d much rather put that £70 towards an FSSB, personally.
Yeap good point. But u loose the element of accomplishing such alone. And the 70 can be better used.
-
If you’ve done any study in metallurgy (or worked in a forge…) there’s a crossing point between “tough” and “brittle”. “Tough” equates to “strong” as “flexible” equates to “brittle”. The base metal parts in the Cougar gimbals are both malleable and brittle - which is why they both wear and break at rate faster than we’d like.
The 3D printed plastic parts may be a sizable improvement, though I think you’d need to relax the spring forces in the gimbal works to get some real life out of them - or add metal bushings at the spring points. But I like the idea of them as replacements…evolution in progress.
-
If you’ve done any study in metallurgy (or worked in a forge…) there’s a crossing point between “tough” and “brittle”. “Tough” equates to “strong” as “flexible” equates to “brittle”. The base metal parts in the Cougar gimbals are both malleable and brittle - which is why they both wear and break at rate faster than we’d like.
The 3D printed plastic parts may be a sizable improvement, though I think you’d need to relax the spring forces in the gimbal works to get some real life out of them - or add metal bushings at the spring points. But I like the idea of them as replacements…evolution in progress.
Interesting, thanks. The springs in the cougar are far too stiff IMO anyway.
-
Ha !
I’m actually a Brit living in SD. I went to Sheffield Uni and once went on out the Pizz in Newcastle.
You were lucky to get on NAS Coronado. I actually came here because I literally switched flight schools because I found out Top Gun was filmed at Miramar-SD. Lots of things are still here. The Kansas City Barbecue for example. But the rumble of the Tomcats has long been replaced by the grinding of MH-53’s and now the 22-Osprey. (they really do make a racket) But just once in a blue moon, a pair of F/A-18’s will depart on RWY 09 at sunset and climb out over those hills. But they never do that sloppy barrel roll. -
Jamesington,
I’m just 100 miles north of you. Get me up in a ride and I’ll give you my gimbals I removed for my FCC3 or FSSB-R1.
Sorry to disagree with Nutty, (Mr. Foxy), but both FSSB and FCC3 are great force mods. Both work perfectly and similiar in response and accuracy and quality. Differences: while the FSSB had force programmable dip switches and the Fcc3 has pots, I found the customer support and spare parts availability by Vipercore to be far superior.
Case in point:
- my original FCC1 was getting wonky so Vipercore offered to fix it or replace its components with FCC3 ones… Free.
- my FSSB-R1 I bought from a sim shop that went out of business for like 1/2 price. It was new in the box, but was missing the top side mounting plate. Realsim said they couldn’t help me. Not saying they weren’t polite, just they made no spares.
A friend in need is a friend indeed. - Benjamin Franklin.
Basically, support is a key differentiator. -
Just redo the piece. Take the measure and look for the material. Is not imposible.
-
You can use a force stick even if you are used to applying a heap of force to the stick… if you down the sensitivity of it to realistic values, you will need to haul on it to make the jet turn anyway.
-
Sorry to disagree with Nutty, (Mr. Foxy), but both FSSB and FCC3 are great force mods.
I didn’t comment on the FCC3 because it wasn’t mentioned in the original post buddy, so there’s nothing to disagree with. The point I was making was that a force sensor mod (irrespective of who makes them) is, in my opinion, the best mod to be flying BMS with. The accuracy and control you get over a stick that moves is second to none.
Cheers
James
ps. Somehow my Nutty account no longer displays all the forums, hence this username and account.
-
OK, I guess that makes sense from your perspective. It wasn’t like I trying to extract molars or bicuspids without N20. Theres disagree as in not the whole story was told, and then theres DISagree as in youre wrong. Lets go for the first of the two.
So…
My point for the OP and others, so as to not miss by exclusion, is that there’s choice out there for force mods. FSSB often gets used as the generic like KLEENX. BTW, Vipercore is currently developing a WartHog version of the FCC3 also.