Does anyone use BMS at a lower resolution than 1920x1080
-
1280x1024 here. I never tried anything higher because text becomes hard to read for me.
-
1280x1024 here. I never tried anything higher because text becomes hard to read for me.
Resolution alone doesn’t necessarily make text harder to read; in fact it makes it easier. DPI is what changes text size. If you want higher res, you’ll need a larger screen so that the pixel density (DPI) doesn’t change too much.
-
2560 x 1080 or 2560 x 1440
4K makes no sense to me - yet. It might save anti-aliasing though.
-
1600x900
slinks back into his cave
-
1600x1024 for me right now….in the market for a 1080 tho
-
1920x1200 for me
-
@A.S:
2560 x 1080 or 2560 x 1440
4K makes no sense to me - yet. It might save anti-aliasing though.
3440x1440 certainly makes the MFDs nice and crisp
-
-
1680x1050… and very happy with it!
-
3440x1440 certainly makes the MFDs nice and crisp
Are there forum rules for bragging too much?
J/K.
I cannot even get my old calc to multiply those numbers. “Out of range”
-
[emoji38] I should be banned for ever? It’s in my sig. [emoji38]
sent from my mi5 using Tapatalk
-
2560 x 1440, any higher and it hurtz.
And I would need a $1k GPU, ouch.
-
Depends on which computer I am using. My PC at home (6 years old and going strong) is 19201080. But I work away from home so I left it loney there. My laptop is a Mac, and the native resolution is 28801800. So I, depending on performance, either go native or run at 1440*900 (usually this)
-
Only switched to 16:9 months ago when my display PSU burned out. Used 1680x1050.
-
1900x1200 … but with the double resolution for the HUD/MFD/TGP/MAV turned off to keep the FPS up.
-
2560 x 1440, any higher and it hurtz.
And I would need a $1k GPU, ouch.
My 980Ti copes just fine. Same low FPS at busy bases as always, but I’m at 75+ most of the time
-
Only switched to 16:9 months ago when my display PSU burned out. Used 1680x1050.
Haha… Left you similar msg yesterday on opentrack.git (interpolation of deadzones, 2 months ago) … My main PSU exploded a month back … funny thing
…1680x1050 = 16:10 (here also)
-
5896x1080 for my Falcon BMS display, a 1920x1080 touchscreen for my main instruments, and another 1920x1080 touchscreen for the left Aux console and other programs like TeamSpeak, hardware monitor, etc. All of this powered by a single 980Ti. For an interesting read about performance, check out my FPS testing thread.
Here is a picture of the rig “at work”…
What I’m interested in for those that game below 1920x1080 resolution –- why? I suspect people who do this are playing on a laptop?
-
why?
Are you for real? Do you honestly think we can all afford to buy such elaborate systems? Some of us live in the real world you know!
-
Are you for real? Do you honestly think we can all afford to buy such elaborate systems? Some of us live in the real world you know!
Um, a 1920x1080 24" screen is hardly an “elaborate” system as these can be had for the price of a 256GB SSD… or are those “elaborate” systems too?
Also, there exists a concept in the real world that should help in getting such elaborate systems… it’s called “overtime”