Why the Falcon 4 Engine needs help!
-
@Red:
Amen mate.
As a moderator i must enforce the forum rules, and one of this rule is that BMS dev doesn’t talk or show pictures about ongoing developmentI don’t see anything in the forum rules that states that??? Please direct!!
C9
-
None of your concern mate, unless you’re a dev
-
The strategy of BMS is very clear though
The strategy is to not have a strategy
People are free to work on what they like provided that this is done with quality and fidelity
-
What’s the next…!
That is not always a good question. Some could mean, that what we have isn’t good enough no longer…, maybe even boring. But that is for sure not an issue from the mod!
But also can this question raise an incentive. But, and IMO, only, if it comes here and there, and rare.
As I began with BMS, I jumped into a cold water, and it pleased me (only two: head tracking, clickable cockpit), what I can do with the mod…, only flying at that time!
To me, there is still not such a question, “What comes next?”.
As long as the devs are developing, there is coming new, or better, that is for sure.That is to me still that cold water, that I love, even when I still would have questions (to the devs).
So, dear devs, hurry up! The next release is in three, four weeks! I’m curious…
Ah, and “This old engine…”:
If you have a truck engine, it is a truck engine. If you have a racing engine, it is a racing engine. If you have a F-16 engine, it is a F-16 engine. A.s.o…For sure has this engine its limits. But, this engine needs no help! There are still times, where I “wonder” how stable the sim (still) is.
All it needs, is to know how to handle this engine, and/or to have the ability to implement (e.g. source code).
All the “rest” is love, time, power…My (single) 2c, and with best regards
Earlybite -
The strategy of BMS is very clear though
The strategy is to not have a strategy
People are free to work on what they like provided that this is done with quality and fidelity
We love when NO plans comes together
-
I just want to fly the 16 in VR…. please? Pretty please?? Lol
That would need DirectX 11 first so not gonna happen anytime soon.
-
Wait… the biggest problem with bms is that it doesn’t have an F-35? lmfao
Can we just stick to improving 80’s/90’s f-16 and campaign.
There are plenty of things left to do. Can the SAM operators behave more intelligently like in Allied Force? Can Buk and SA-10 shoot down HARMs and glide bombs? Why don’t people ask for these kinds of features…Intelligent and devious SAM operators sounds like a great idea!
-
@Cloud:
Oh no, no. BMS is TOP SECRET SQUIRREL STUFF!!! No can do!!!
C9
once you cross the squirrels and OPSEC labels you a Doolittle, it’s all over.
CHIRP CHIRP
-
Its a down hill slide, :boxing:
All I want is a 2560x1440 UI, and my two front teeth . so I can again :second:
-
Its a down hill slide, :boxing:
All I want is a 2560x1440 UI, and my two front teeth . so I can again :second:
that could be a “Oi santa claus you ****” moment for xmas
-
@Switch:
That would need DirectX 11 first so not gonna happen anytime soon.
But, If i take a trackir, The i take a vr and i use the cable of my screen? Shouldn’t be that kindoff a VR?