Whats the Best Hornet?
-
-
What can possibly go wrong?:D
BMS and DCS differ enormously. You can fly BMS the same as you would fly DCS but you can’t fly DCS the same as you would fly BMS. It’s just in its infancy,and there is no comparison really (as of yet). Now… :pop2:
-
@Sgt_Fresh:
In Falcon you do not have “Hornet”. You have an F-16C avionics suit which mimics the Hornet in a limited way if you consider HC level MFD, HUD, etc modeling. For many player this is more than enough but for creating a video for with comparing to a WIP DCS Hornet…? It seems to me pointess. When it will (ever?) be finished it will far beyond whan BMS ever can model because it is a dedicated module.
-
The BMS F18 is the best cause is an F16C.
-
Why is this video even a thing? Of course DCS: Hornet is going to trump Falcon BMS in terms of Hornet simulation. We’re lucky to have a nice Hornet model and pit in BMS, but BMS is an F-16 sim. Go fly the F-16 in DCS and you’ll sharp be running back to BMS
-
Well the Colosseum arena must be irrigated… so let’s throw some Gladiators to the lions or to the martyrs…
«Ave, Caesar, morituri te salutant»
-
What a silly thread…ibtl.
-
Go fly the F-16 in DCS and you’ll sharp be running back to BMS
With time everything comes.
-
-
With time everything comes.
Not in this case.
Someone is going to have to prove to me that Falcon is not a dead end.
Secret Squirrel random updates don’t cut it anymore.
-
Ridiculous comparison.:rolleyes:
-
That One
-
Not in this case.
Someone is going to have to prove to me that Falcon is not a dead end.
Secret Squirrel random updates don’t cut it anymore.
What is it with all the trolling lately Mower? The DCS wet dream love confessions are already getting a bit… awkward. But why the Falcon slapping? Just curious.
-
lol, its like discussing your new girlfriend with your old-girlfriend.
Telling her how much better and beautiful the new one is just to convince her you made the right choice, and to yourself, but deep inside you already know the loss;-) -
With time everything comes.
Not in this case.
Someone is going to have to prove to me that Falcon is not a dead end.
Secret Squirrel random updates don’t cut it anymore.
Isn’t it strange - I read Carlos’ post as a subliminal “there will be a be-all-and-end-all F-16 in DCS one day” - anyway…
Falcon, if by that you mean BMS Falcon, is by far and away NOT a dead end. BMS philosophy is not to openly market their material, and to release it when it’s ready. Given BMS and DCS operate in two different spectrums, it is entirely acceptable (IMHO) they work this way - they have nothing to sell and as such do not need to hype their product. DCS on the other hand rely entirely on hype to market theirs. All that said, DCS could actually learn something from their approach, especially the second part.
I’ve seen the future - it is going to blow everything DCS has to offer out of the park. Patience, and belief, is all that’s required.
-
Not in this case.
Someone is going to have to prove to me that Falcon is not a dead end.
Secret Squirrel random updates don’t cut it anymore.
You know what I don’t get about your posts and posting style? It feels like, for some reason, you WANT Falcon to die. Is it true?
You said once on another forum that “BMS will die because it’s an Elitistic group”, or something like that (I won’t bother looking for the exact post on Falcon online, but that was the spirit of it).
So, in the spirit of that post, I would like to ask you this:
Did we EVER do anything wrong to you that you hate us or our product so much? So much that you actually wish it to die? If yes then I would like to know what’s that? If no then why you keep throwing these arrows everywhere?It’s funny to read your comments about F-18 DCS, it’s like you are waving it in front of everyone here. And I ask you, what’s the point of that? What do you expect to get out of it? Do you want to justify your saying above? Like the “I told you it won’t hold” ? Just like you are saying on this very thread?
Is it the way we do things? Is it because we didn’t do a dedicated Hornet? Do you think you know better than us what is doable and what is less doable, and where to put our efforts? I honestly don’t get it. Maybe you can elaborate?
And, in case you want to take “points” of this post. I tell you this:
We See what DCS are doing
We don’t care
We will keep developing Falcon even if we will be the only ones to fly it - It’s our product and we like it the way it is
DCS can do dynamic campaign
DCS can do F-16C
We don’t care…DCS will never be like BMS
-
I can 100% understand his love for the Hornet because: Mower and F-18 fit so well together.
Gift shop.
Mower is speaking about
… :nosep:You said once on another forum that “BMS will die because it’s an Elitistic group”, or something like that (I won’t bother looking for the exact post on Falcon online, but that was the spirit of it).
Correct: http://falcon-online.org/forum/index.php?topic=2418.msg27958#msg27958
[@Mower:I have pointed this out repeatedly in the past on the BMS forums to no avail.
At its heart, BMS Crew is a closed elitist group who scorn outsiders.
And this is why it will die.](http://falcon-online.org/forum/index.php?topic=2418.msg27958#msg27958)
… I won’t bother to list all the people from the Public forum that have been integrated to the team because they have the spirit and the talent, more than than just having a mouth.
Personally, I do not care what he think. I just wonder what he is still doing here rather than enjoying and focusing on his F-18? “Frequency occupation” maybe? … I do not know!?
-
Couldn’t have found a more perfect video for this thread if I tried.
-
Mower crossed a line.
Mower was offensive.
Mower is silly.
Mower is not perfect.
Mower apologizes.
…and I will patiently await proof I am factually incorrect.
-