Frustrated with GBUs and JDAMs
-
Gotcha, thank you both! Off to try it out…
-
Worked like a charm. Big badaboom! Thanks, fellas!
-
And the first cue is for what exactly?
All that ppl read is wait for the second cue.Στάλθηκε από το MI 5 μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk
-
And the first cue is for what exactly?
All that ppl read is wait for the second cue.Στάλθηκε από το MI 5 μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk
….
Edit,BTW, first timer and flashing reticle is for loft delivery. For non-lofting, ignore the first cue and wait for the second one … then hold the pickle only for last ~2 seconds before the release cue (use the timer in the HUD).
:razz:
-
All are loftable? I mean u don’t loft an lgb from what I know. Mostly it’s for free fall iron bombs, and lofting I don’t think it’s so popular. So instead of showing it for lofting operations they just show it all the time?
Doesn’t bother me much but it’s against kiss and too much unneeded info.Στάλθηκε από το MI 5 μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk
-
Why wouldn’t you loft an LGB? I can come up with some situations where it can be pretty useful… Do you expect the forward motion to mess up the guidance-control aerodynamics or something like that?
Now that we have a topic on LGB’s… I was wondering about this the other day: In the LASR DED page you can, if you want to, change the lead time before impact in which the laser will be on. I seem to get a much better hit-rate (never missed since actually) when I increase this number to 20s. This makes sense as the LGB has a lot more time to correct for errors in the drop. However… isn’t this soft-cheating? Does anyone have a figure on how long (or better, how far away) an LGB will be able to track? And does BMS take this into account?
-
I mean u don’t loft an lgb from what I know. Mostly it’s for free fall iron bombs, and lofting I don’t think it’s so popular.
Buddy lazing for one! pop up LGBs, go hide as wingman lazes. no?
-
@TwanV:
Why wouldn’t you loft an LGB? I can come up with some situations where it can be pretty useful… Do you expect the forward motion to mess up the guidance-control aerodynamics or something like that?
Now that we have a topic on LGB’s… I was wondering about this the other day: In the LASR DED page you can, if you want to, change the lead time before impact in which the laser will be on. I seem to get a much better hit-rate (never missed since actually) when I increase this number to 20s. This makes sense as the LGB has a lot more time to correct for errors in the drop. However… isn’t this soft-cheating? Does anyone have a figure on how long (or better, how far away) an LGB will be able to track? And does BMS take this into account?
Buddy lazing for one! pop up LGBs, go hide as wingman lazes. no?
Yup …… lofting LGB’s and/or JDAMs can be very effective.
IIRC, we (former VFW) had some advice from someone with RL experience to always (not just lofting) set the laser timer in the DED to 150 seconds. Basically begin lasing immediately, not just during the last portion of flight. If so, then no, increasing to 20 or 30 seconds wouldn’t be a ‘soft cheat’.
All are loftable? I mean u don’t loft an lgb from what I know. Mostly it’s for free fall iron bombs, and lofting I don’t think it’s so popular. So instead of showing it for lofting operations they just show it all the time?
Doesn’t bother me much but it’s against kiss and too much unneeded info.Στάλθηκε από το MI 5 μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk
Who knows why it’s designed the way it is, other than the BMS devs and/or Lockheed-Martin. Assuming that the BMS representation is faithful to the LM reality, why wouldn’t it be included, regardless of your/our perception of utility or simple-ness or excess information?
-
I dont think setting the laser timer to 150 seconds is a good idea, I always thought that lasing too early flattens the LGB trajectory, not letting it to follow its ballistic calculated curve, so making it loose energy and fall short.
-
Paveway II in some situations yes. Most trajectories it’s not a big deal. Paveway III is smarter not to cut the corner.
-
Paveway II in some situations yes. Most trajectories it’s not a big deal. Paveway III is smarter not to cut the corner.
Modeled in BMS?
-
Rather than speculate and confuse people with real-life versus BMS discussions please refer to the BMS-Training manual, where the LGB chapter clearly states that 16 to 20 seconds works well in BMS 4.33.
While the LGB modelling in 4.33 is an improvement over 4.32 (where bombs would sometimes increase in speed to meet the time on target), it gets even more realistic in the next version
-
Rather than speculate and confuse people with real-life versus BMS discussions please refer to the BMS-Training manual, where the LGB chapter clearly states that 16 to 20 seconds works well in BMS 4.33.
While the LGB modelling in 4.33 is an improvement over 4.32 (where bombs would sometimes increase in speed to meet the time on target), it gets even more realistic in the next version
I agree for god sake rtfm !!!
-
Paveway II in some situations yes. Most trajectories it’s not a big deal. Paveway III is smarter not to cut the corner.
Perhaps it happens because the main diference is the fins control system, which is proportional in the newer versions