Threat Guide
-
Downloaded !
Many thanks !
-
Thank you!
-
Thank you, also for the fast replay!
-
Thanks for updating the document. It is very useful.
We are also working on an update for the EFB and want to implement some parts of your document like in the already published version of the EFB. Can you give us a changelog or something else so that we can compare the versions?
Otherwise we have to compare it page by page and that will be cost a lot off time.
BG
Keule -
Thanks TeeSquare…. Your TG is a must! Couldn’t survive without it.
-
Thanks a lot ! For SP users like me with little time this is an awesome addition and very appreciated. Thanks a bunch man !
-
Many thanks
-
Thanks for updating the document. It is very useful.
We are also working on an update for the EFB and want to implement some parts of your document like in the already published version of the EFB. Can you give us a changelog or something else so that we can compare the versions?
Otherwise we have to compare it page by page and that will be cost a lot off time.
BG
KeuleA lot of things changed. Too many specific things too list all of them. Generally the following things changed:
Cover sheet
Table of contents
Info on radar changes, lobes
Number of targets for SAMs
Checked several SAMs again some ranges changed
Revised several Sam ratings for countermeasures
Added Odd Group
Added Hawk search radars
Updated several CMDS/ ECM listings on AC
Added J-11
RWR symbol changes for AC 27, 29, 30
Checked IR values all AA Missiles
Added PL-10 and 12
Updated All tables
Added ship section -
I do not understand why is marked so high G level for SA-4. It has one of the weakest turning capability in the game. Even the SA-2 is better.
I also do not understand the low G value against the SA-8. It has one of the best turning missile among Cold War SAMs.
ZU-23-2 is not Shilka. Somehow it also got this name in the doc not only the ZSU-23-4
-
Thank for the information, I guess it’s easier to make a complete exchange in the EFB.
We will publish soon…. -
Hi Tee-Square .
Here’s “datas” to fine tune your Vault !
S-31E2 KOLS IRST : For the Mig 29 A and S . Still not sure for other variants , I’ll check this .
cheers,
-
A must. Thanks !
-
Thank you TeeSquare for your hard work putting and netting all this together!:p
-
Is it possible the max range of the following missiles?
SA2: 90.000 ft
SA3: 120.000 ft
SA5: 327.000 ft !!!
SA10: 276.000 ft !!! -
-
Is it possible the max range of the following missiles?
SA2: 90.000 ft
SA3: 120.000 ft
SA5: 327.000 ft !!!
SA10: 276.000 ft !!!I guess the range values are set according to “bubble”.
The SA-10 in the game is the SA-10B = S-300PS which has 75 km eng. range. It is fine.The 100 km range for the SA-5 is also good. Against tactical fighters the 250 km nominal range is just an illusion. It is not true. Their RCS is too small to track them. The SA-5 was designed against bombers and AGM-28 missiles.
(I have the engagement zone diagrams.) -
This post is deleted! -
Thank you for the diagrams
-
Is it possible the max range of the following missiles?
SA2: 90.000 ft
SA3: 120.000 ft
SA5: 327.000 ft !!!
SA10: 276.000 ft !!!Data are given in feet :
SA2: 90.000 ft = 15 NM
SA3: 120.000 ft = 20 NM
SA5: 327.000 ft = 54 NM
SA10: 276.000 ft = 45 NM -
Could you include the HAD SAM symbiology and their radars in The Vault?