Taiwan 4.35.3 (compatible with bms 4.35u1)
-
Yeah, I do too.
Thanks for all,
Gianni.
-
We found a brutal bug tonight while playing Taiwan. The JF-8F will display on the RWR as an f-16. We checked in the editor and its radar (PS 37) uses the same RWR symbol (37) as the AN/APG-68. This resulted in 3 of us getting smoked to ambush front quarter aspect PL-12 shots
Apparently it uses the Type 1492 radar - but i couldnāt find much about it. Recommend we use a 29radar on RWR?
-
Will look into and at thatā¦
So the J8 show as f16 , because they use same radarā¦
Will try some tweaks to get J8 on rwr ā¦ same tweaks needed for some other ac. -
Fix for prc rwr problem is now in updated hotfix on first post.
I donāt put it here , in case I forget to delete here in next hotfix. -
Had to adjust hotfix to version 50921 to make j20a not show as f22 in rwr.
In first post. -
J-8F RWR shows
J-10A and J-10C RWR J-16 RWR <30>
J-20 RWR <25> -
In the new 4.35 installation, there is no default ādata folderā. There is one in the older installations.
-
Should we make the HQ-16 based on SA-17 RWR? According to Wikipedia is based on a BUK originally. Right now it shows up as a patriot
-
HQ-17 is based on SA-15 āGauntletā" Tor M1" . a Chinese version " SA-15" improvement. it needed to be shown as ā15ā
-
Should we make the HQ-17 based on SA-17 RWR? According to Wikipedia is based on a BUK originally. Right now it shows up as a patriot
you mean HQ-16 right? yes it needs RWR edit.
we donāt have HQ-17 in DB - itās a SA-15 copy.
-
if itās about HQ-16, i think itās no problem to show ā17ā for HQ-16. Because the role of HQ-16 is much like the SA-17
Furthermore, both missiles are very similar in shape.
-
oops yes I meant HQ-16. HQ-16 is currently patriot right now. Very confusing because it will show lethal inner ring at very far ranges. Can we please change that to 17 on the RWR?
Another feedback is that its currently pretty impossible to fight the J-20, usually you cant get any lock until 10 miles or less. Iād imagine that you would be able to lock on further out than that (20-25 miles?). Thereās no info out there about the efficacy of stealth aircraft (its all classified) but iād imagine just based on physical properties of radar cross section youād be able to get a lock closer. Currently there is no way to attack a J-20. We had 1 J-20 kill 5 of us in a flight and we all had tally on it but couldnāt get locks.
-
Hotfix in first post updated to 51821
Hq16 has same radar as sa17
J20 has rcs 0.25 -
Just a quick comment, to avoid confusion with BMS versions, I would suggest that you avoid using 4.35.3 as it relates to 4.35 Update 3 which doesnāt exist yet?)
It would make more sense that you indicate a different version and say with what version it is compatible.
Cheers
-
how about 435.1.3? 435U1.3 ?
once U2 out, new mod could be 435.2.1 or 435U2.1 .
-
how about 435.1.3? 435U1.3 ?
once U2 out, new mod could be 435.2.1 or 435U2.1 .
Okay , this sounds fine.
Next main update will be like this. -
I mean use the version you think fit for your theater but just mention in the title what version of Falcon it is compatible withā¦
Like Kuwait v1.0.2 (compatible: Falcon BMS 4.35.1 U1)The more I think about it, the more I think I need to put in place something for theaters to keep track of all of thatā¦
Cheers
-
I mean use the version you think fit for your theater but just mention in the title what version of Falcon it is compatible withā¦
Like Kuwait v1.0.2 (compatible: Falcon BMS 4.35.1 U1)The more I think about it, the more I think I need to put in place something for theaters to keep track of all of thatā¦
Cheers
Max;
Could you put a sticky a thread which contains an alphabetical list of all the theatres that work with the current version of BMS 4.35.X along with direct links to the download thread?
-
Johku has made a blog entry listing all available theaters for 4.35
-
So, well done to him, and thanks a lot to you, dear Stevie.
With best regards to all.