AAR Orgy - BLUE force
-
Next update : remaining A’s models
A-6E, A-7E, AV-8B, AV-8B+ - All function ok in AAR
-
The B’s -
B1-B & B-2A - AAR ok
B-52G - AAR ok but graphically its not connected . . .
B-52H - AAR ok
-
The C’s -
C-130H, C-141B, C-17, C-5, CF-188A - AAR ok
The C-160R NG (tanker) is the only c-160 that has AAR option (there are more 3 sub types of the C-160).
The problem with the C-160R NG is that its max speed is so low, 214kts/100% power . . . so it can not catch the kc-10 that its low AAR speed is 230kts.
So this type is stalling the next waiting aircrafts in line to refuel.
I will test it in the future with the kc-130 & C-160R NG (in tanker role) - -
-
Next update : the E’s (no D’s)
E-2C, E-3A, E-8C, EA-18G, EA-18G (RAAF), EA-6B, EF-111A, EF-18M, Eurofighter - all AAR ok (E-2C & Eurofighter got a graphical issue in the connection point) -
1st time the tanker used its central refueling basket . . .
-
Next update : the F’s (Part 1)
F104C, F-111E, F-111F, F-117, F-14A, F-14A AGR, F-14B,F-14D - all AAR ok
(F-104DJ, F-104G, F-104J - don’t have AAR capability)
-
@white_fang said: Awww, fuckit , Call Mr. Fixit
I actually gave him a call.
He asked: “You a friend of White Fang?”
I said: “I know him.”
Dude immediately hung up.
Now all of my calls go directly to voice message… -
@white_fang said: Awww, fuckit , Call Mr. Fixit
I actually gave him a call.
He asked: “You a friend of White Fang?”
I said: “I know him.”
Dude immediately hung up.
Now all of my calls go directly to voice message…Really?
He sucks.
But you would have been better to mind carefully your current main business on your side, though.So may this be the correct definition for a draw, perhaps?
With best understanding regards.
-
Hello,
here, IAS is not really relevant.
At 16926ft, an IAS of 214kts means a TAS of 275kt and mach 0.4, which is totally ok.
It’s slow for a combat aircraft, but fully realistic.
Best regards,
Radium
-
Next update : the F’s (Part 2) - F-15’s
F-15A, F-15C, F-15C AGR, F-15C IAF, F-15CJ, F-15D, F-15DJ, F-15E-220, F-15E-229, F-15I, F-15K - All AAR OK.
F-15A, F-15D & F-15DJ have problems at the connection point, the boom is too deep (that what she said . . .) ,i circled it in red circle.
-
(BMS updated to 4.36U2)
Next update : the F’s (Part 3) - F-16A & F-16B
F-16A-15, F-16-15 IAF, F-16AM(BAC, RDAF, RJAF, RNAF, RNoAF), F-16B, F-16B IAF - all AAR ok
-
-
@regev
Just about the Vipers: “ok” is a diminutive, mate, and you are until too modest, to me.
“Perfect!” may sound more adequate… no other sim can compare to ours, amd here is clear why.Nice and self-explicative shots them all, you are skilled in this too, by the way. So thanks a lot for sharing.
With best compliments and regards.
-
(BMS 4.36U2)
Next update : the F’s (Part 4) - F-16C&D Blocks 25-32
F-16C-25, F-16C-30, F-16C-30 18AS, F-16C-30 IAF, F-16C-32, F-16C-32 64AS, F-16C-32 EAF, F-16D-30 IAF - all AAR ok
F-16D-30 IAF - the boom is too deep . . .
F-16C-32 ROKAF - for some reason the aircraft never reached the refuling area and no communication between him and the tanker. I will check it again and report. -
@regev
I can’t recall id I told this before, or not.
I love particulars… thanks a lot for this too, dear mate.With best regards.
-
-
@regev
Sure thing that, mate, especially if you keep on making shots as nice as you are currently doing.With best compliments again and regards.
-
@regev
Well, at least RED’s have “baskets” only … there should be no problem (eh?) with “boom”(s)Really, BIG Thanks for this insight ,… checking all this… but I suppose there is some fun involved also
-
(BMS 4.36U2)
Next update : the F’s (Part 5) - F-16C&D Blocks 40-50
(+ checking again the “problematic” F-16C-32 ROKAF from previous update)F-16C-40 EAF, F-16C-40 IAF, F-16CM-40, F-16CM-42,F-16DG-40 IAF, F-16DM-40, F-16C-50 HAF, F-16CM-50 - all AAR ok
F-16DG-40 IAF - the boom is too deep . . .
F-16C-32 ROKAF - quote from previous update -
“for some reason the aircraft never reached the refueling area and no communication between him and the tanker. I will check it again and report.”So, i checked it again. This model made 1st AAR with no problem.
After he finished the AAR he got for some distance and after 1min he ask the tanker to refuel again !!!.
The 2nd AAR lasted for 1-2sec and then he disconnected and go out of there.
So this model seems to have chronic problematic behavior in AAR. -
(BMS 4.36U3)
Next update : the F’s (Part 6) - F-16C&D Blocks 52/52+
KF-16C-52 ROKAF, F-16C-52+ HAF, F-16C-52+ CFT HAF, F-16C-52+ EAF, F-16CM-52, F-16CM-52 THUNDERBIRDS, F-16D-52+ CFT RSAF, F-16DM-52, F-16I-52+ IAF, F-16I-52+ CFT IAF - All AAR OK.
F-16I-52+ IAF - the boom is too deep . . . (model F-16I-52+ IAF with CFT was ok, so i guess it can be an easy fix).
During this mission i noticed collision related issue, the last pictures have the details.
During the mission i notice an f-16 getting too close to the tanker.
The wing of the tanker was “in” the f-16 but no damage or problem to the fighter, he kept flying his mission -So i tried to check it with my f-16 . . . the tanker wing has no “Collision feature”. Next i tried to touch the body of the tanker . . . big fire - - - blackout—tanker disappeard—so i guess part of the tanker is “Colission enabled”. I wonder if all BMS aircraft behave like that . . . -
-
(BMS 4.36U3)
Next update : the F’s (Part 7) -
F-22A, F-4D ROKAF, F-4E ROKAF, F-4EJ JASAF, F-4E GAF, F-4G - All AAR ok.
F-4M(FGR.2) RAF - this model did not engage or was at the area of the tanker (no comms either) - i will check it again next mission.
F-4D ROKAF, F-4E ROKAF, F-4EJ JASAF - for this models the tanker used the basket system but the actual connection point was wrong, i circled it in red circle.
Another 2 thing :
Tried to check also the F-5 (A,E,N AGR) - all have no AAR capabilities. I checked, in RL they do have AAR capabilities.The F-CK-1C & F-CK-1D have no AAR capabilities, as in RL.