Santa's wishlist for BMS
-
@LorikEolmin said in Santa's wishlist for BMS:
@Tomcatter31 said in Santa's wishlist for BMS:
@Mav-jp said in Santa's wishlist for BMS:
@dutchfighter said in Santa's wishlist for BMS:
One thing i like to see in bms is civil jets or other aircraft. Normaly the sky is filled with civ jets and in compair a hand full mill planes
Now all planes are mill or mill related.
I think it would be fun to do intercept mission where you got to search for the enemy between all those civ jets. Now if you see something flying on your radar you know its mill (friend or foe)I saw something simulair on dcs but those planes are flying like they are a fighter jet (last time i saw it few years ago, i dont follow dcs any more so i dont know the state it is in right now.) And prop planes fly way to fast . I think the bms crew can do a much better job on that one then they did (back then)
If its al ready in bms where can i find it?
I highly doubt you would see any civil aircraft in war environment
Agree with you on the war environment, but I still think the addition of airliners could be interesting. You could use them in TE’s to fly a QRA. F-16’s here scramble quite frequently to ‘intercept’ airlines when they lost radio contact etc. Or if you fly with an Air National Guard unit, you could fly your training misssions from civil airfields. In the US quite a few Guard units operate out of airfields that also have airliners. Like Fresno California for example in the Nevada theater. Could be fun to operate in an airfield and have airliners operate from there as well. Not for the campaign, but in TE’s…
There’s room for a a whole Game Master field in the TE environment (real time interaction with AI orders from UI, to start with), but I’m not sure this is the direction the devs want to take.
If the UI is revamped, that’s another interesting prerequisite potential question: access to UI while in 3D for a dedicated server, without having to run on another computer.
Fair enough, I can see that. Just thought it could be interesting for TE’s. All it takes is add some airliners to the DB. Somebody already did that in the Aegean theater (I think?) sometime ago. I remember screenshots of an Airbus A320 back then. If you do some training flights in TE’s it could liven up the theater a bit if you could add some airliner flights as well.
-
@hiuuz use the app MFDE and extract it
https://www.falcon-lounge.com/falcon-bms-essentials/guides/recommended-tools-for-falcon-bms/ -
@AWmk1 THX the advice. Yes, at the moment I use MFDE
-
@LorikEolmin said in Santa's wishlist for BMS:
Possibility to limit zoom level and disable “instant zoom” in server settings, the same way external views are forbidden.
Hi!
I did some calculation and a quick “kindergarten” sketch about my setup. In my case a 40 degree FOV will be the “natural” value. I think in that case would be the cockpit in real size on the screen, but 40 degree already a bit tunnel view. I wonder Smart Scaling how releated to FOV, how the devs defines the value of Smart Scaling. Even in 60 degree FOV sometimes the distant planes look like big whales swimming in the skies, they look way too slow flying. But for dogfighting Smart Scaling is a MUST HAVE! At least in my opinion.
Ready to be argued
-
My wishlist for 4.37 :
Koni class frigate ( Balkans )
Sa-22 Pantsir ( Balkans and Izrael )
Ground crew
Exact layout of stationary Sam sites ( Sa-2/3/5)
Greeting -
I thought I understood when reading that JDAM bombs could not be as accurate as LGBs (Paveway III): indeed, they could suffer from loss of connection with satellites or even jamming…I would like to see uncertainty or enemy jamming introduced in BMS in order to introduce a new dimension to the planning of ground-air missions and to put an end to god bombs…
http://www.ausairpower.net/TE-GPS-Guided-Weps.html -
HMCS target selection of ground targets.
Ability to see multiple flight plans on the UI planning map. For example, seeing the tracks and steer points for the tanker as well as the F16 2 ship. This could be done by selecting the different flights from the drop down in the Flight plan dialog box.
Improved engine sounds during startup in flight.
-
@Sokol45 said in Santa's wishlist for BMS:
Exact layout of stationary Sam sites ( Sa-2/3/5)
There is not such thing as “exact layout” for SA-2/3/5. There were typical layout plans but there were here and there small differences between sites because of the terrain and available free space.
What you posted in a typical SA-2B,F, Divna site, while SA-2E Volkhov units typically were deployed to hardened sites.
See here.
I can of SA-2E moved out to terrait it would look similar to SA-2B,F
Somebody has already made years ago an SA-5 site as I can remember with two missile battery composition. Sadly it did not find way into any other theater and the core DB as I know.
https://forum.falcon-bms.com/topic/17310/authentic-sa-5-site/6
An SA-5 can have 2,3 missile batteries, only a very few had 5 missile batteries and only one had 3+1 (near Vladivostok, it was a unque thing.)
-
@molnibalage thank you for the explanation,the wish is if it could be like for example in Israeli theater Range 602 where target simulates the SAM position
-
It would be great to having three point guidance for the 2K22M Tunguska, 9K33 OSA AKM because this is the only guidance what they can do. While in BMS their missiles perform leading which is totally unreal and has strong impact on their energy management and interception capability.
-
Auto-save functionality should suffix ‘Auto Save’ with the date the campaign was created on.
In other words, starting a new campaign and pressing Back should not overwrite an ‘Auto Save’ from a previous campaign.
-
Being able to talk with other flights in ur package, ie if ur an escort… you can tell the strike package to hold point as the air space is littered with enemy air.
-
Unabashedly bumping my wish for one of the next updates:
A functioning Rate-of-Turn Indicator.
Fast forward to 13:18 . . . .
-
BMS is right now, more than i ever expected from a simulator. So i ám happy and thankfull for what i get from the Dev. Team
Pretty sure they will keep up supricing us. Even without a wishlist.
So! Thank you folks -
Adding one more Wish.
Found this video in This day discovery thread:
Wishlist item: in place of “physical” AI ground crew, have a sequence of text appear as the Crew Chief performs each of his checks, during which there’s a delay, then the result of the check, e.g., per the video: Oooh, how about AI voice reporting each check!
- FLCS Panel check . . . OK
- MFSOV Panel check . . . OK
- . . . .
- EPU Leak Detector Pellet . . . OK
- . . .
- EPU Safety Pin . . . Pulled.
-
why does it take off with a safety pin inserted in the left rear with the wing?
-
@AlehandroGTI The safety pin you refer to are removed on the ORP before take off.
-
Would there be any technically acceptable possibility to add battle background noise to JTAC speech?
-
Vr!!!
-
@MaxWaldorf that’s great news… Santa really coming this year!!!