MiG31-LowPoly
-
Great, would be interesting to fly against such a capable weapons system as the Mig 31m. Fighting against 2 or 3 data linked flights, if implemented properly would result in death :D.
Very cool aircraft, one of my favorites. BIG RADAR!!!.
Thanks. -
Sadly, the most important feature of the Foxhound cannot be modeld, the simultaneous engagement capability with SARH missiles.
-
WIP- hull texture pure without effectsā¦
-
IMHO panel lines are too thick and to dark.
This is quite a āwornā airframe but even on this image panel lines are much less thik and strong.
-
@Tom:
WIP- hull texture pure without effectsā¦
WTF,
you wanna win the fast speed modelling contest, ehā?ā¦ amazing.
Cheers,
LS -
The monster is waking up ā¦
-
What are you guyz taking for so quick results??
Small correction; - As i see in the rl pics the engine exhaust should be solid; meaning not having (external;) pedals moving like in your skin. ??
-
Mission accomplished! Heavy air superiour power :shock: These beast will bring you nightmares
-
Good job!! and nowā¦ Please, give us a link!!
-
Nice work mate, thank you!
Nikos. -
Hi Tom Catz.
You can improve your AB a little bit.Optional You can add a AB lights to the DAT.
Light7Position -28 0 0.3 #after burner chain0
Light7Color .8 .65 .4
Light7Type 10
Light7Radius 95
Light7Attenuation .06Light8Position -30 0 0.3 #after burner chain1
Light8Color .8 .65 .4
Light8Type 10
Light8Radius 95
Light8Attenuation .10Light9Position -33 0 0.3 #after burner chain2
Light9Color .8 .65 .4
Light9Type 10
Light9Radius 95
Light9Attenuation .20Light10Position -36 0 0.3 #after burner chain3
Light10Color .8 .65 .4
Light10Type 10
Light10Radius 95
Light10Attenuation .30Light11Position -40 0 0.3 #after burner chain4
Light11Color .8 .65 .4
Light11Type 10
Light11Radius 95
Light11Attenuation .45Regards Hayab.
-
I dig it. Great work! Maybe one day weāll have a true ālow-poly modeā option in BMS for those willing to sacrifice pixels for fps.
-
I dig it. Great work! Maybe one day weāll have a true ālow-poly modeā option in BMS for those willing to sacrifice pixels for fps.
You can always reduce the screen resolution, even to 640 x 480 if you want
-
You can always reduce the screen resolution, even to 640 x 480 if you wan
Hmmmm. I was generalizing. I actually get quite high average frame-rates even with my older machine, at 1280x1024, the problem is loading stutters/pauses. See here: https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?14056-Targets-LowPoly-Edition&p=199300&viewfull=1#post199300
-
-
-
Would you stop digging old thread and your video shenanigans Toro?
-
OK
-
-
Yeah, thatās not bad. I think that this particular forum is great because you can do things like that and people (including authorities) donāt really mind. Iāve been on some where one could be banned for far lesser things just because moderators were idiots and cared more for the letter of their rules (and their own egos, they even had rules specifically for protecting itā¦) than the forum community or any individuals in it. Iām glad this place is completely different.
Admittedly, I rarely watch your videos, but thereās no harm in posting them. Indeed, itās probably better to have them grouped by aircraft rather than having them lumped into a single thread. Makes finding relevant ones a breeze.