C-130 Hercules Cockpit.
-
I would prefer to see the coder time used to implement IFF
I knew you were infected with the virus! HAHAHAHA
-
I knew you were infected with the virus! HAHAHAHA
Nope. Iām just saying that ā¦ if we do the IFF, we must do it as real as we can. Not by doing just like in FF or DCS/Lock On. It means : I do not want a perecft tool.
But Iām not against anything concerning avionics stuff except HQII whch would be TOTALY pointless within our simulatorās scope.
-
Sure Dee-Jay those u say r the best and most wanted then this.
What we just say and suggest here r just simple stupid wantsā¦
I believe by this time u come to ignore such as we all r just bla bla bla but some times we throw and some good ideas on the table.
We donāt really know the insides and the wip list of BMS so we just say our stupid wants and hope to be included not necessarily for the next release or the one after it just in 3-4 Falcon weeks, :lol: .I donāt think also this to be done just to drive BUS drives (FSX and Xplane) hereā¦ Falcon is not a company needing more clients from competition.
-
Yep.
And on my side Iām trying (sometimes not in a smart way ) to give you an overview of the āgeneralā team POV (can be also subjective of course) ā¦ otherwise, you woud have no info at all since we are not communicating (or very few) on WIP.
RUS asked for opigion, I gave mine.
-
well for TEās it has a meaning. Letās say u have the role to protect the C-130 Land on an airfield (friend or FOE) like suicide or rescue missions and return it safe home.
If u have AI when it gets threatened it will RTB or have unknown behavior, flying it a human can go along with HOLD patterns and take avoidance paths.We have used this scenario many times and itās really fun and stimulating.
Dee-Jay the drop Cargo could be like a bomb thing and strict it to specific criteria like speed altitude and AoA so load that bomb in the C-130 and when u pickle it will release the cargo or airmobile. It will be successful if the criteria where met.
Still would need some code though.Wonderful scenario Arty!!
Well wellā¦ So much for the C-130!.. Thank you for all your repliesā¦ I dont buy the argument, that other Sim pilots not would find any joy in flying a Cargo plane in BMS, rather than FSX/P3D. We have the C-130 in the real Royal Danish Airforce. So I just came up with the idea, since i saw Nizmoās wonderful work on the B1 ( which also is a Long journey tactical 4 engine plane, which can DROP bombs )ā¦
The C-130 IS in my opinion a tactical plane.!!
If I had the knowledge and skill, I would have done it myself. Now I dont, and I see others haveā¦
See you up there!!
RUS
-
The C-130 IS in my opinion a tactical plane.!!
It is actually! ā¦ If it is for flying tactical missions (airdrop, assault landing, high level drop etc ā¦) furthermore in coordination with Slow Mover pro ā¦ 100% it is exiting!
But if they are saying that they do not like War action missions ā¦ then ā¦ ? (because tactical air lift mission ARE war mission!)
-
And what about Air Refueling? Bad it will not work with a human in the KC.
-
And what about
Let me remind you guys that for the moment ā¦ we are still on a (relatively incomplete and āsometimesā bugged) F-16 sim. IMHO ā¦ before considering such request (however, nice and interesting ideas) ā¦ lets finish and fix currents problems (or at least, the āmost criticalā).
Then ā¦ we might think about that kind of (possibly funny) āmulti vectorā request
(Do not want to be the āno no guyā once again ā¦ but if you are asking āwhat aboutā ā¦ I kindly give you my personal feeling about the overall team philosophy.)
So ā¦ talking about human conducted Air Drop, Assault landing, AAR etc ā¦ while not impossible (?) certainly not to be expected āanytime soonā.
-
:lol: even though u r the Darth Vaderā¦ :lol: Dee-Jay u r not the no-no guy at allā¦ so donāt say that, u r more then kind and patient with us and the info u pass is more then anticipated with the way the BMS team - community communication is done.
Just for some guys what we have already might seem just perfect F-16 wiseā¦ So we-they ask for extras outside the BMS circle of interest. I believe this is anticipated.If the BMS wip - priority list was public and our priorities was asked Iām sure u would be amazed from the differences in priorities and the question for 1.000 things not existing on the listā¦ :lol:
And here BMS says thank God itās secretā¦ to save your self from us the Lions in the Arenaā¦ :rofl:
Now is it me hearing calling me Robin Hood again or u hear it too??? :rofl:
-
So we-they ask for extras outside the BMS circle of interest.
100% understandable.
-
No time to loose with this IMO ā¦ In that case, I would prefer to see the coder time used to implement IFF or a new terrain mesh model ā¦
I am new to BMS but not new to the FLight Sim community. But I do agree that the worst thing would be to spread all over the place forgettting the initial purpose of Falcon BMSā¦
Eventhough you have different kind of planes in BMS, what do you think is the best scenario for core team ?Make F-16 even better or implement new aiplanes?
IMHO, Let each sim have their pros. Here BMS is F-16 focused so I would stick to that. You donāt even now if prop are modelled correctly if you suffer the torque effect, etcā¦
My personal POV. I do not see the point to try to convert some FSX pilots by convicing them to comme on BMS if it is just to do the same than in FSX (RKPP to RKJK!).
I would rather stick to my moto : One goal, One simā¦
Let X-Plane / P3D (FSX is almost dead) to the civil community because in such slow plane you need bautifull grounds to enjoy the time flying byā¦
Either BMS or DCS are not meant for thatā¦My 3 cents
Cheers
-
AC-130 Gunship?! LOL just kidding. I stick with the Viper always!!! Sure I get in other planes from time to time just for fun but always fly the F-16 in campaign. Keep up the good work BMS team!
-
I have a pit WIP
-
That is pretty cool Nizmo!
-
GREAT !!!
in particular the LAST PIC !!! keyboards appear to be ā¦ā¦
:D:D:D
GREAT !!! keep it up !!! -
I have a pit WIP
:woohoo::bowd::woohoo: NIZMOā¦ You are fantasticā¦ !!!Maybe my prayers are heard!!! Thank you so much for your wonderful Work!!
RUS
-
Nizmo you keep amazing me man great work stay on it
-
Well wellā¦ Right on time for this Threadā¦!!! NIZMO: maybe there is something you can use.
RUS
-
Hey Nizmo and other developers!!!
Any news on the C-130 cockpit ???
-
Hello,
I announced, some months ago, I will start when I will have finished the F-2 and other stuff the development of a fully BMS compatible C-130 series.
When I say BMS compatible, itās simply because their building rules are very strict, and, not so much third party developers match these requirements.
As I am not sure at all about the point to get a C-130 cockpit for BMS (I am not even sure BMS would integrate it if I make it) ; I declare myself ready to make it, if this becomes a relatively interesting priority in BMS doctrine (which I doubt).
Since then, I can participate to any community development, if people wants some 3D meshes, for the yoke, the throttle, etc. I can make them, itās not so much work.
Best regards,
Radium