When keepin' it real goes wrong 2014 edition [Falcon BMS]
-
Including the dude that shot me down on accident? Who mind you, is easily the most experienced Falcon 4 dude I know.
.There is a bug when the seeker (diamond) is locked on one a/c and the FCR(td box) is locked on another a/c, the missile tracks the FCR lock.
Your MFD says WARM seeker.
-
-
Uncage before launching your missile. Otherwise, you can’t know if the IR seeker is properly tracking (the right target)
Impossible to tell you more since you are using exotic sounds.
They are not exotic sounds, they are “something’s gone wrong” sounds which I too have experienced with a vanilla install (video posted in an earlier thread).
-
which I too have experienced with a vanilla install.
Simply impossible.
Something wrong on the in-install or reinstall process using an non empty folder or something like this …
But some of the sounds heard in the video do even not exists in the stock installer. So is it strictly impossible that the sounds comes from a stock install.
(video posted in an earlier thread).
Could you give a link please.
-
I used to have same problem with this ‘‘exotic sounds’’ in stock korea. I guess the reason for that is having other mods installed in to BMS. Reinstalling Falcon solved this issue.
-
Could you give a link please.
See this post Dee-Jay. This is a clean vanilla install.
https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?19991-AIM-9-sound-problem&p=288852&viewfull=1#post288852 -
The issue is not you not have a good shot solution. Monli has modified the missile data in 1980’s Korea. He even said it in his statements. Missiles do not have the superior 1 one shot one kill in his theater. Heat seeking missiles especially. See here: http://www.mediafire.com/view/93fa383hq868kbf/Korea-80-mod-Release-notes.pdf . Look for Main feature and list of changes.
-
Yep, Molni apparently modified heavily seeker performance. Its his belief that F4 heatseekers are way too good. I personnally disagree, in ideal conditions, it should behave very good. Whats missing in the code is degraded performance from the weather and general atmospheric conditions.
So in this mod, be aware that you have AIM-9B instead of AIM9M
-
Yep, Molni apparently modified heavily seeker performance. Its his belief that F4 heatseekers are way too good. I personnally disagree, in ideal conditions, it should behave very good. Whats missing in the code is degraded performance from the weather and general atmospheric conditions.
So in this mod, be aware that you have AIM-9B instead of AIM9M
I havent really had any problems with them using his mod. Certainly not like what this video shows. The only concerns Ive had with them (in the mod) is that if they flare then the missile is definitely not going to track them - and Im not so sure that that would be considered a bug rather than a feature.
-
@fluffer I have the same issue. I wasn’t in Korea 80 theater but standard KTO and I only have a vanilla install. Good tone, uncaged, no FCR track, and good cooling, but the missile just went straight ahead with no guidance. It’s just the 9m version that does it. 9x works like a charm(as always[emoji5]) anybody else with this issue?
-
1 hour.
I have to correct myself:
It’s 1.5 hrs.Coolant discharge is modelled for 9M and 9X.
But not for 9P.Source: Tested by myself in a TE.
-
See this post Dee-Jay. This is a clean vanilla install.
https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?19991-AIM-9-sound-problem&p=288852&viewfull=1#post288852Yep… And I confirm. No problem on your vid. This is the stock tone of AIM9P.
On Fluffer’s vid, tone and some other sounds are not stock one.
-
arghhh another mod …… sure that Target 12 o’Clock you are in his six, < 1 mile, perfect conditions, seeker should fail LOOOL
-
Yep… And I confirm. No problem on your vid. This is the stock tone of AIM9P.
On Fluffer’s vid, tone and some other sounds are not stock one.
Okay, that’s good to know they are stock sounds. I was expecting growling, hence my suggestion it was FUBAR. Thanks for clarifying…
-
You’re welcome Malc.
-
-
that’s a lot of missile rail negative(-)incidence modeled.
-
Fluffer, would be kind to point where to have a look (time) … no time to watch 10 min of ACMI!
OK … got it at 09:00
Seems to have A LOT of angle for an AIM9P (almost 90° on the 2nd shot!)! Remember, 9P it is a rear aspect and not as agile as the 9X.
Could you give a try and show an ACMI on a TE in a perfect seatdy position. (Target not manoeuvering)
-
I’m not sure if the 80’s campaign’s AIM-9M is modeled as the AIM-9P but if that were the case it would explain a lot. I’ll throw up a quick TE utilizing the same exact plane and target in an intercept and will post the video of the results.
-
I’m not sure if the 80’s campaign’s AIM-9M is modeled as the AIM-9P but if that were the case it would explain a lot. I’ll throw up a quick TE utilizing the same exact plane and target in an intercept and will post the video of the results.
Huh. Considered double checking you have the right SIM data files?