Vietnam Theater

[Phantom11]

@Buster:

The theater needs to be converted to 4.34 first. Reading on what is needed to convert it…

How is progress?:bowd:

[Buster]

@Phantom11:

How is progress?:bowd:

Right now we are not working on the theater. Let’s ask the team if thay have time to work on it… Check your PM’s guys

[Jackal]

This is good news, Buster.

I volunteer to be among its testers since now, if you like it of course.

With best regards.

[Obi1]

This theater would already be very interesting looking from the weather perspective, now that it’s truly cell based.

Cheers Obi1

[Toro]

[ghostdog]

@Buster:

Right now we are not working on the theater. Let’s ask the team if thay have time to work on it… Check your PM’s guys

Pilots like me with no expertise in modding or building campaigns would greatly appreciate the effort. As one of the people late to the tester party last time, I for one would be happy to tip my hat into the ring on a 4.34 tester program if needed. Give me a to-do list and a test build and I’ll get cracking when I can

[Phantom11]

Gentlemen, is work being done on the theater?
Every day I hopefully go to this thread.

[drmagnumwolf]

@Phantom11:

Gentlemen, is work being done on the theater?
Every day I hopefully go to this thread.

Me too!
I use Visualping to monitor this thread. It checks it every day, and when there is a change it tells me and I immediately click it to check

[APOLLO 11]

+1

[Buster]

Currently there is not a team working on the Vietnam Theater to be available in 4.34. It is however fully functional in 4.33.

If this is wanted we/you can gather our talents and bring this one for 4.34: What do you pilots think? It’s a community project: so it’s us that’s making this not some distant hidden team of builders waiting for the phone to ring We released this to the community so feel free to take the lead

[ccc1tw]

i don’t think 4.34 Vnam could be done in short time.

stay with 4.33 Vnam, or try this 4.33 DB update sample for fun.

http://www.mediafire.com/file/hn33id2vj3agkdf/DB_Edit%253DAdd-On_Vietnam.zip/file

[ghostdog]

I would greatly appreciate a port over to 4.34, IFF etc would be handy, as would just having newer more updated models (especially 3D troops!)

[ghostdog]

@ccc1tw:

i don’t think 4.34 Vnam could be done in short time.

stay with 4.33 Vnam, or try this 4.33 DB update sample for fun.

http://www.mediafire.com/file/hn33id2vj3agkdf/DB_Edit%253DAdd-On_Vietnam.zip/file

does this make your existing vietnam campaign work with .34?

[ccc1tw]

no. just DB upgrade for 4.33.

[Manos1981]

@ghostdog:

I would greatly appreciate a port over to 4.34, IFF etc would be handy, as would just having newer more updated models (especially 3D troops!)

did they had iff in nam???

[Dega]

@Manos1981:

did they had iff in nam???

IFF, in one form or another, has been around since the 40’s so yea . . .

[parislord]

True but must not have been considered very reliable or widely used considering the ROE required visual id of aircraft to avoid a blue-on-blue…

[Migbuster]

@parislord:

True but must not have been considered very reliable or widely used considering the ROE required visual id of aircraft to avoid a blue-on-blue…

IFF would still have needed Visual ID were it used.

in 1972 they did get something better called Combat Tree……a bit like IFF but it directly interrogated the MiGs SRO transponder instead. So a response from this was almost a guarantee of a MiG and they did get some BVR kills. But even here they still had to ensure there were no friendlies in a certain distance of the target.
Even so despite the accurate reply most CombatTree use still needed Visual ID from what I have seen.

[Jackal]

Well, Gentlemen… we have just got the ‘light’ version of it, as seems.

Now, it’s time perhaps to have it refined and some work for campaign creators, I guess…

With best regards.

[Manos1981]

So… Is it possible to add the objects from the 4.33 Version? Now i mean with the rest of the job done at least…