BMS 4.33 question

[Minrah]

hey guys been playing for awhile now and I was wondering if there was any update on the new 4.33 and I also had another question

would it be possible to fly two pilots per aircraft(two seaters)? I know you cant do that now but would it be possible in anyway on a future patch, if you guys have to teach me to code i seriously might take it up

[l3crusader]

1 - https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?22205-BMS-Release-Date-Questions&p=321647#post321647

2 - not possible and quite a handful to code. If you want to learn to code and see for yourself in some of the leaked F4 code wandering around the internet, feel free.

[upsidedown]

1.Q any update on the new 4.33 ?
1.A The only answer is When it’s ready

2.Q would it be possible to fly two pilots per aircraft
2.A Not yet. Could bee in the works. No news is good news

All wee can do is wait and see. ( Wait 4.33 it )

[Guldager]

What if there actually never was a 4.33? :rolleyes:

[Sherlock]

@Guldager:

What if there actually never was a 4.33? :rolleyes:

HERETIC!!!

Just kidding…. :rofl:

[Agave_Blue]

@Guldager:

What if there actually never was a 4.33? :rolleyes:

Even better: What if there actually never was anymore 4.33 threads?

[Korbi]

Time to close this

[oldtommyboy]

main forum page…

[PAVEWAY]

Ahhhhh…. same old sh!t just a different day.

[Falcontower]

@Guldager:

What if there actually never was a 4.33? :rolleyes:

@Sherlock:

HERETIC!!!

Just kidding…. :rofl:

+1

[Dee-Jay]

Two seater with full a/c control and shared gauges/MFDs, it has been already discussed internally.
Answer is: No, not gonna happen. Common bandwidth will not allow this. First limitation is Internet BW.

Maybe something to be discussed again in several years when “everybody in the world” will have the optical fibre at home. (?)

[Shadow]

@Agave_Blue:

Even better: What if there actually never was anymore 4.33 threads?

I think it would be good to only have 4.33 threads.

[Agave_Blue]

@Shadow:

I think it would be good to only have 4.33 threads.

Aye!

I’d simply prefer one or the other.

[Minrah]

thanks guys for answering my questions, didnt think i would get this many replies O_o

[Vyper37]

@Minrah:

thanks guys for answering my questions, didnt think i would get this many replies O_o

You said the magic word , 4.33 , that’s why !

[Blu3wolf]

@Dee-Jay:

Two seater with full a/c control and shared gauges/MFDs, it has been already discussed internally.
Answer is: No, not gonna happen. Common bandwidth will not allow this. First limitation is Internet BW.

Maybe something to be discussed again in several years when “everybody in the world” will have the optical fibre at home. (?)

its already done mate. bandwidth was not a limitation.

Only problem is control of the aircraft cannot be switched between seats correctly.

Pretty sure you commented in the thread about it, too…

using top gun views on the nearest friendly aircraft, and host/client settings on lightnings MFD extractor.

@Vyper37:

You said the magic word , 4.33 , that’s why !

Hmm. I wonder if prefacing every thread title with [4.33 question] would increase forum traffic.

[4.33 question] Can 2 seaters be flown in BMS 4.32?
[4.33 question] How to steer on the ground?
[4.33 question] long time lurker saying hi!

in exemplar.

[l3crusader]

:munch:

[Shadow]

@Vyper37:

You said the magic word , that’s why !

So “why” is the magic word ?

[Reaper58th]

Just the possibilty that i could have a “passenger” on my jet would be a cool feature IMO. I imagine a second pc, equipped with a Oculus Rift, hooked up on the flight pc’s network. Just sitting in the back during a mission would be a great experience for non-flyers.

Edit: thinking about it i see some other capabilities connected, e.g. observer station at KOTAR, tower crew checking ground ops ….

[Raptor]

@Dee-Jay:

Two seater with full a/c control and shared gauges/MFDs, it has been already discussed internally.
Answer is: No, not gonna happen. Common bandwidth will not allow this. First limitation is Internet BW.

Not want to continue the conversation regarding this feature, nor comment to the thread, but to just add that if not tested in practice you cannot safely support bandwidth limitations with specific data upload/download numbers.