I have a question guys

[abdo-totti]

i dunno if this is the right section but how do i install add-on’s/mods

abdo.

[Zeight]

I would also ask where we can find all the available mods and which ones overlap. Arty’s Hot List is a start but doesn’t describe what’s out there.

[Badger]

BMS itself, is the best available mod.

Get familiar and comfortable with it first.
Just my opinion and recommendation.

Cheers

[Zeight]

Makes sense. Since you’re also a Big 10 fan, I’ll take that advice.

[Mower]

@Zeight:

Makes sense. Since you’re also a Big 10 fan, I’ll take that advice.

Well played.

[Stevie]

…Oskee Wow Wow.

[abdo-totti]

after five posts nobody answered my question.

i want t install textures and theaters etc.

[molnibalage]

@abdo-totti:

i dunno if this is the right section but how do i install add-on’s/mods

abdo.

Pls. be more exact. For which theater which textures.

[abdo-totti]

@molnibalage:

Pls. be more exact. For which theater which textures.

https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?12247-Tom-s-texture-pack

http://eastmedfront.net/index.html

^^

[molnibalage]

@abdo-totti:

https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?12247-Tom-s-texture-pack

http://eastmedfront.net/index.html

^^

As I know EMF has installer…
Tom’s texture map contains tile texture but DL link does not work to me so I cannot check its content… You do not need for EMF because it has its own totally unique texture set.

As I know EMF does not have campaigns, it is not finished.

[abdo-totti]

i got tom’s texture pack and models learned how to install.

if you have any decent theaters can you tell me?

and thnx.

[molnibalage]

@abdo-totti:

i got tom’s texture pack and models learned how to install.

if you have any decent theaters can you tell me?

and thnx.

If you are not newbie I recommend mine Korea '80s MOD. No AIM-120 on any unit, lots of SAM and AAM have much better (based on RL data) modeling values, no more holy weapons (even R-73 and AIM-9M not immune to flares), generally better ATO, it is far more harder than any stock campaign…
…but this does not come by simply dumping lots of units to reds it simply uses better available units.

https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?20345-Korea-80s-Theater

[Dee-Jay]

@molnibalage:

SAM and AAM have much better (based on RL data) modeling values, no more holy weapons (even R-73 and AIM-9M not immune to flares), generally better ATO,

[MOLNIBALAGE

and

](https://www.concrete5.org/files/9713/7026/9951/jb_certified_screenshot_0_1370269951.jpg)

supervised by

:uham:

[l3crusader]

@molnibalage:

lots of SAM and AAM have much better (based on RL data) modeling values

Some values might be better, but I’m pretty sure you had to compromise to have acceptable behavior and fire enveloppes, since there is a bug regarding thrust on the missile FM You wont see it too much with SAMs, but definitely with AAMs.

[molnibalage]

@Dee-Jay:

MOLNIBALAGE http://cdn2.hubspot.net/hub/212464/file-259228481-jpg/images/kcma-certified-cabinets.jpg

and

http://www.avnetwork.com/portals/0/JITC_logo_lo.png

supervised by

http://images7.webydo.com/44/446505/3958%2F05c95ace-914f-4e04-8278-6e8a98f1e0ab.jpg

:uham:

Funny.
You can see here how “accurate” the stock SAM modeling…
https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?8230-Suggestion-for-database-data-supply

Some values might be better, but I’m pretty sure you had to compromise to have acceptable behavior and fire enveloppes, since there is a bug regarding thrust on the missile FM You wont see it too much with SAMs, but definitely with AAMs.

I know but lets just forget just for a moment the theory and check the time-speed char. comparing to RL. This is the first step. So as long as Volhov has the 1/3 or RL eng. range we cannot speak anything “realism” especially in case of SA-5 what has or had such guidance values which thrased the SAM because was not able to hit a straight flying target outside about 5-6 deg aspect…

This will be fixed on higher level in 4.33 but as long as 4.33 is not public / released…

[l3crusader]

@molnibalage:

I know but lets just forget just for a moment the theory and check the time-speed char. comparing to RL. This is the first step. So as long as Volhov has the 1/3 or RL eng. range we cannot speak anything “realism” especially in case of SA-5 what has or had such guidance values which thrased the SAM because was not able to hit a straight flying target outside about 5-6 deg aspect…

This will be fixed on higher level in 4.33 but as long as 4.33 is not public / released…

Yes, most SAMs are not ideal in 4.32 but the SA-5 is really garbage compared to what it should be. Unfortunately the thrust profile has to be unique in BMS, while IRL it can change depending on range.

Anyway, all this missile modeling stuff is irrelevant to the OP’s question

[molnibalage]

@l3crusader:

Yes, most SAMs are not ideal in 4.32 but the SA-5 is really garbage compared to what it should be. Unfortunately the thrust profile has to be unique in BMS, while IRL it can change depending on range.

Anyway, all this missile modeling stuff is irrelevant to the OP’s question

Because of bubble limitations and most common targets it can be selected a thrust profile which suits the best in game and RL either.