Why does the team still use the obsoleted engine? why not an add-on for fsx or p3d?

[cvn751]

I think an add-on for fsx or p3d that comprise F-16s and dynamic campaign may be the better alternative choice.

ok frankly I just know I must post an item or I may be pruned,so I post.

thanks for the manul more than 1000 pages ,I am reading it with my clumy english.

[dolphin]

Go for it! Start coding…… maybe in 3-4 weeks it’ll be finished :rolleyes:

[Nigel]

Great first post cvn751, thank you for your insight. The DEV team will look into that right away.

[Raptor82]

:uham:

[DrDetroit]

Yea, what’s the big deal. Just copy and paste for sh*t sakes!

[Reaper58th]

@cvn751:

ok frankly I just know I must post an item or I may be pruned,so I post.

Hehe, at least I got the joke. But honestly, there would be a better anti-prune-post than about such a touchy subject :mrgreen:

Just a HELLO-Post in the General Topics forums would have done the trick also

[molnibalage]

@cvn751:

I think an add-on for fsx or p3d that comprise F-16s and dynamic campaign may be the better alternative choice.

ok frankly I just know I must post an item or I may be pruned,so I post.

thanks for the manul more than 1000 pages ,I am reading it with my clumy english.

Because Falcon is so complex that you can’t swap the whole engine and sturcture of the game. And as you can see on the result it is not needed.

Great first post cvn751, thank you for your insight. The DEV team will look into that right away.

Sarcasm ON.

[ataribaby]

cvn751, You can’t be serious, aren’t You?

I love this type of posts.

[Darkman]

I can’t see this thread going anywhere but downhill

Move on, nothing to see here!