Falcon BMS Forum
    • Categories
    • Unread
    • Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Popular
    • Website
    • Wiki
    • Discord
    • Register
    • Login

    Why does the team still use the obsoleted engine? why not an add-on for fsx or p3d?

    General Discussion
    9
    9
    464
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      cvn751
      last edited by

      I think an add-on for fsx or p3d that comprise F-16s and dynamic campaign may be the better alternative choice.

      ok frankly I just know I must post an item or I may be pruned,so I post.

      thanks for the manul more than 1000 pages ,I am reading it with my clumy english.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • dolphinD
        dolphin
        last edited by

        Go for it! Start coding…… maybe in 3-4 weeks it’ll be finished :rolleyes:

        N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • N
          Nigel @dolphin
          last edited by

          Great first post cvn751, thank you for your insight. The DEV team will look into that right away.

          Raptor82R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Raptor82R
            Raptor82 @Nigel
            last edited by

            :uham:

            D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              DrDetroit @Raptor82
              last edited by

              Yea, what’s the big deal. Just copy and paste for sh*t sakes!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Reaper58thR
                Reaper58th
                last edited by

                @cvn751:

                ok frankly I just know I must post an item or I may be pruned,so I post.

                Hehe, at least I got the joke. But honestly, there would be a better anti-prune-post than about such a touchy subject :mrgreen:

                Just a HELLO-Post in the General Topics forums would have done the trick also 😉

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • molnibalageM
                  molnibalage
                  last edited by

                  @cvn751:

                  I think an add-on for fsx or p3d that comprise F-16s and dynamic campaign may be the better alternative choice.

                  ok frankly I just know I must post an item or I may be pruned,so I post.

                  thanks for the manul more than 1000 pages ,I am reading it with my clumy english.

                  Because Falcon is so complex that you can’t swap the whole engine and sturcture of the game. And as you can see on the result it is not needed.

                  Great first post cvn751, thank you for your insight. The DEV team will look into that right away.

                  Sarcasm ON. 🙂

                  ataribabyA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • ataribabyA
                    ataribaby @molnibalage
                    last edited by

                    cvn751, You can’t be serious, aren’t You?

                    I love this type of posts.

                    DarkmanD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DarkmanD
                      Darkman @ataribaby
                      last edited by

                      I can’t see this thread going anywhere but downhill 😉

                      Move on, nothing to see here!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • First post
                        Last post

                      70

                      Online

                      9.2k

                      Users

                      22.2k

                      Topics

                      362.4k

                      Posts
                      Benchmark Sims - All rights reserved ©