I may be the only one
-
i feel the same
i find some bms users very disapointing compared to DCS ones.
at DCS they pay hundreds of € for a POS and dint even complain,
Easy, brother.
Or has BMS become a fan boy zone where only complimentary remarks are permitted (like DCS forums?).
BTW not sure how you think DCSW is a POS. Some major Falcon community players think otherwise…
-
Well to fair, on the positive…
The terrain IS better, approaching what FSX can give. So it is better.
The aircraft models are much better, the Viper is gorgeous
Enabling SPI support very much appreciated.
Documentation is excellent.Well done.
-
Well to fair, on the positive…
The terrain IS better, approaching what FSX can give. So it is better.
The aircraft models are much better, the Viper is gorgeous
Enabling SPI support very much appreciated.
Documentation is excellent.Well done.
You are making positive statements about a sim without using the word p0rn?
What’s wrong with you?
-
Oh some nasty surprises in airman ship now.
-
I don’t know much about FLARE but if it even a chance it is better than Polak’s tiles it must be something. I thought Tom’s Korea was so much better than 4.32 stock but Polak’s are so much better.
-
I knew I could read these things after the release.
The only thing I feel in these hours it’s after 1600 hours of flights with falcon I am a completely noob about the new avionics system and all the new stuffs like the realistic ladd bomb or the new and realistic maverick tgp use. And someone can tell “once you learn to play instruments…”
I can’t really understand you guys sometimes.Realistic LADD mode? This is implemented now? I thought the training manual said otherwise… guess Ill have to check it again!