F-16A ?
-
I do not understand why is better to have nothing then X% accurate model for F-16A.
Not correct … not better have nothing … but better have X% more for Blk 40/50
The 3D pit layout is doable with single MFD. Do not want to use other MFD page. Do not do it. Very simple…
We don’t have original 3D model of Nanard ckpt … so not possible to change it.
-
This post is deleted! -
And thrustmaster should start producing that block 1 HOTAS!!!
-
Fly the Mig-21. Tell us how much fun that is in F4.
It would need AI EW radar opperators.
-
I personally would appreciate a good modelled F-16A for older scenarios.
And I for myself would like to see all efforts concentrated on bugfixing than adding new aircraft/flightmodels.
-
Yea next like DCS please go for the spitfire or Mustang??? it was? LOL
Come on guys get real… F-16A???
I understand that maybe here some RL pilots would like the old mold but going back when today ain’t fully covered yet? -
Given some limitations that still exist in Falcon and freely available resources, would you please point me to what things aren’t fully covered yet?
-
Yea next like DCS please go for the spitfire or Mustang??? it was? LOL
Come on guys get real… F-16A???
I understand that maybe here some RL pilots would like the old mold but going back when today ain’t fully covered yet?Most of well modeled scenario (real of fictional) happened when F-16A Block 15 or not advanced than Block 25 available…
IMHO all developments should built around one question.
Is it usable for good campaigns?
If the answer is no…
-
Most of well modeled scenario (real of fictional) happened when F-16A Block 15 or not advanced than Block 25 available…
IMHO all developments should built around one question.
Is it usable for good campaigns?
If the answer is no…
That surely is a question for campaign builders. If someone wants to make an '80’s to first half '90’s campaign, then it would fit in perfectly.
-
Hi question is how many F-16 variants do we really need especially the older ones??? and how many 80’s Korea campaigns ??? are needed which sacrifice other A/C’s especially modern one’s and some nice modern war theater campaigns from being created!
Really would be good to discuss?
Also, it would be nice to see F4 progress from the traditional to a more modern F4 but still incorporating the original concept meaning evolve more through current timeline!
Looking at the Community mods thread you need to match whats coming out of there, yes I still believe in keeping the F-16 concept with pure functional avionics but with the F-18 and some other WIP jets that are in the community mods thread you gotta start looking forward not backwards.
Think about the “Big Picture” and the younger players coming on board, 5th gen jets etc etc C’mon guys make it more interesting instead of the same old boring stuff!
Especially now with new multi-player code and eventually online Dogfights, make F4 bigger than what your just use to!
Embrace “Change”, Mix it up more for others also, please, please, please for goodness sake!
F4 can be much more, embracing all it could be and should be for all likes and types!
This is why I created this link :- BMS F4 The Big Picture
Cheers,
:drink:
-
No need to argue guys … there will be no F16A nor F-16V in BMS. (never say never, don’t know, but not planned at this time… and will certainly not planned in futures versions)
-
Deejay why you guys see everything as argument its a discussion bud relax
I am very happy to discuss an understand what are the driving points for peoples opinions, a discussion helps me understand others ……:D
LoL :lol: :lol:
Also since we cant do or use sign language we use this forum :lol: Be happy dont worry :lol:
I try to use the forum for its potential to discuss something we all like and is relevant, anyway!
Now insults are no good, I personally wont stand for it and ignore those that do!
Cheers Bud, its all good with me!
:drink:
-
Skynight, you are a “special” person.
-
@SkyKnight:
Deejay why you guys see everything as argument its a discussion bud relax
I am very happy to discuss an understand what are the driving points for peoples opinions, a discussion helps me understand others ……:D
LoL :lol: :lol:
Also since we cant do or use sign language we use this forum :lol: Be happy dont worry :lol:
I try to use the forum for its potential to discuss something we all like and is relevant, anyway!
Now insults are no good, I personally wont stand for it and ignore those that do!
Cheers Bud, its all good with me!
:drink:
Okay … no problems mate …
So talk about why do we could/should/must etc … have F-16A, V, XL etc …
But remember that this discussion is (IMO) “pointless” if you are trying to convince DEV to implement such variant… (it is what I’m seeing behind that thread why a poll ? )
Don’t be disappointed by futures BMS versions.
Maybe in “several years” … (?)
-
-
why a poll ? )
To see the rate.
SHAME ON YOU LAZYSTONE. Don’t you know by now, Dee-Jay does NOT like to hear any one else’s opinion, EXCEPT HIS.:p;)
RAM22
-
This post is deleted! -
@RAM22:
SHAME ON YOU LAZYSTONE.
@RAM22:
Don’t you know by now, Dee-Jay does NOT like to hear any one else’s opinion, EXCEPT HIS.:p;)
RAM22
But that’s why I’ve started this thread,
to hear everybody’s opinion.… even Dee-Jay’s.
Cheers,
LS -
@RAM22:
SHAME ON YOU LAZYSTONE. Don’t you know by now, Dee-Jay does NOT like to hear any one else’s opinion, EXCEPT HIS.:p;)
RAM22
100% …
But it is not really my opinion … it is what I feel by living inside the TEAM … (I could be wrong)
I’m not against at all to see an F-16A … that could be fun! … But does it mean that it will happens? … unfortunately no.
Nobody is asking opinion about what heading BMS development should take … but you are giving it anyway trying to convince “everybody” that it is a “must to have”.
It is mainly why we do not communicate about development status and WIP. We don’t need your opinion we made our “choices” a long time ago … we just hope that you will like what the team is doing.
Do you realize that we are very few trying to give you few clues about what is going on inside the TEAM and what you can and/or can’t expect from us … ?
… you want me to shut my BIG mouth … no prob.
At your orders sir.
-
100% …
But it is not really my opinion … it is what I feel by living inside the TEAM … (I could be wrong)
I’m not against at all to see an F-16A … that could be fun! … But does it mean that it will happens? … unfortunately no.
Nobody is asking opinion about what heading BMS development should take … but you are giving it anyway trying to convince “everybody” that it is a “must to have”.
It is mainly why we do not communicate about development status and WIP. We don’t need your opinion we made our “choices” a long time ago … we just hope that you will like what the team is doing.
Do you realize that we are very few tiring to give you few clues about what is going on inside the TEAM and what you can and can’t expect from us … ?
… you want me to shut my BIG mouth … no prob.
At your orders sir.
:shock: