Iff you could have one thing in the next update it would be. (Archive)

[upsidedown]

Buddy Lazying . IFF . More 3D Cockpits . More Control Options .
Better A.I. Control / Command.

[TxMtb]

Kobayashi Maru

[APOLLO 11]

An F-15E Strike Eagle 3d pit and FM added with the ones already on the way (AV-8B + F-18C)!
Definitely needed as one of the major types flying in Korea and Israel Theater.

(Even if not 100% cklicable). Wonder how this was not even suggested - so far - as a possible WIP.

here is an older example in FF

Give Eagle a chance in BMS!!!

[spooky]

This post is deleted!

[cptmtge]

Better terrain and a pint of Guinness that refills itself automatically

[jinro88]

Better weather modelling (though it’s probably impossible because of the code).

[Lawndart]

@TxMtb:

Kobayashi Maru

+1

[Agave_Blue]

Talent …. more talent.

[Scuby]

@upsidedown:

Iff you could have one thing in the next update it would be…

Definitely:

Cheers, Scub

[Zipgun]

IFF, please, please, please. It would greatly reduce comm. chatter and fratricide in busy engagements.

[Dee-Jay]

ooops … 3 - 4 weeks is becoming 3 - 4 years!

BTW … sorry to inform you (one more time) that IFF is not planned. If you want some information about IFF, make a search in the forum. You will (maybe) understand why it is a very low priority. (ATM)

[TigerShark]

Some more 3d pits, would be nice…

[Trueno]

active trees autogen

[Xeno]

Because weather and terrain engine were alreaty mentioned, i’d go for robust scripting language for ai and aircraft systems/avionics modelling (ability imrprove those without access to the core sourcecode).
Then all the other flyable aircrafts would start to make sense. Too bad that ain’t gonna happen in forseeable future.

[Guest]

Ground forces use to be controllable. It made winning campaign objectives possible. I remember early BMS in 2011 had unstoppable Engineer Battalions that would march right in and take over the city, though not realistic.

Is it fixable? Can BMS improve on ground troop AI and controlability, as it was somewhat working in earlier versions of Falcon.

[I-Hawk]

@Xeno:

i’d go for robust scripting language for ai and aircraft systems/avionics modelling (ability imrprove those without access to the core sourcecode).

Always wondered what does “scripting avionics” actually mean? I mean, what do you expect such a “scripting” system to be able to do? let you decide where some labels will be positioned on the MFD? or what built-in functionality some buttons on the MFD can do? because if that’s the thing, then this isn’t avionics, it just playing around. For real “upgrades” of avionics, only code will help.

As for other ACs systems, I can tell you that even if we had the time to code some (which we don’t, the F-16 itself still require a lot of work), I can hardly think of maybe the F-18 and probably the A-10 as the only other ACs that worth investing some time on, for other jets, its mostly bits and pieces of knowledge here and there, hardly to even start thinking of the basic systems.

[Planehazza]

Stick to F-16 with even more detail. Better AI and comms.

[Eghi]

This thread should be named - letter to Santa.

[Earlybite]

Flickerfree cockpit with 1920*1200 and FOV 70 without supersampling

TIA :))
Earlybite

[NIL]

Only one HUD colour available, Green, and buddy lasing would be nice along with a more dynamic weather engine…

Greetings