3DPIT WISHLIST
-
I voted Rafale
-
1/ F-16A
2/ F117
3/ EF2000 -
Donāt say you wouldnāt fly it!
Tj
-
We should have added to the list also the F-16 block 60 and the near-future USAF upgraded F-16ās with the CPD monitorā¦
-
Is there Block 60 in DBā¦? Most of features of Block 60 cannot be modeled, IMHO therefore it is pointless. You cannot model towed decoy, IRST, AESA radar. The more advaced ECM can be but I have never met any person who know how it works the ECM strenght value. You can increase the effectivness of ECM but only feedback what you can get if you tests it ingame.
I have to say I do understand why so many people wish to see AC which are not suitable for the engine while there are so many which are fit into Falcon universe quite well.
-
Is there Block 60 in DBā¦? Most of features of Block 60 cannot be modeled, IMHO therefore it is pointless. You cannot model towed decoy, IRST, AESA radar. The more advaced ECM can be but I have never met any person who know how it works the ECM strenght value. You can increase the effectivness of ECM but only feedback what you can get if you tests it ingame.
I think it was sarcasm. Wasnāt it?
I have to say I do understand why so many people wish to see AC which are not suitable for the engine while there are so many which are fit into Falcon universe quite well.
You do?
I have to say Iām a bit disappointed with the result of this poll. Seriously? F-15E? Rafale?! EF-2000?!
-
I have to say I do understand why so many people wish to see AC which are not suitable for the engine while there are so many which are fit into Falcon universe quite well.
I have to say I do understand why so many people wish see new funcion-switches that need a lot of code-work (mounth if not years) when the community have a lot of modelers, graphics and talented (and motivated) guys that want to still alive the āfalconā worldā¦ bahā¦ each one have his opinionā¦
-
Voted F16A
-
I think it was sarcasm. Wasnāt it?
Which comment? Mine or Raptorās? Mine was not sarcastic.
-
Not yours, his comment. I agree with you on this subject.
-
to paraphrase the Rolling Stones " you canāt always get what you want" !: reading the title of the thread does not mean he will make the most desiredā¦
-
to paraphrase the Rolling Stones āyou canāt always get what you wantā
Yeah, I knowā¦
but EF-2000?;) -
Most of features of Block 60 cannot be modeled
Thatās why we vote for 3D cockpit, wich are graphics not Features ^^
Unless I misunderstood what you mean ?
I find it awesome how the fight is on between the Rafale and the Eurofighter !
Itās like a football game for me lol -
What I donāt understand is why the rafale was included or considered. Didnāt someone try this before and was discouraged because of some legal shit or something. And that was just for the 3D model if I recall now we want a cockpit? If we couldnāt have a 3D model why would we be able to include a pit?
-
What I donāt understand is why the rafale was included or considered. Didnāt someone try this before and was discouraged because of some legal shit or something. And that was just for the 3D model if I recall now we want a cockpit? If we couldnāt have a 3D model why would we be able to include a pit?
we always want what we cannot have
on that note, F-14! F-14! F-14!
-
we always want what we cannot have
on that note, F-14! F-14! F-14!
I agree with you. If you look at the Database then look at what we are offered right now āStockā KTO Forget all these add-on theaters and mods.
The
F-15C
F-15E
F-5
A-10Are the only aircraft on that list that donāt need to be manually added to the campaigns. Therefore those in my opinion should be done first. Although At this point I would like to see a EF2000 the most and then the F-15C
P.S The Eagles are the only ones on that list besides JanHas F16ās that donāt need a complete overhaul on the model as well. Seems like more work than pits will be needed on a majority of these planes
-
Iāve opened this thread only to understand whatās the wishā¦ donāt worry about AC models or skinā¦ or featuresā¦ devs already working onā¦
On my side, I found strange why most of you dont start to learn how to build a new AC model, a new skin or a new "features, instead to talk about it
most of devs are started to write His āfalcon-storyā in this way
mine would be an encouragement, not a āsarcasticā post
-
voted days ago: F16A + F15E
too bad I did not vote F5 or T50 or both too ā¦
now they fall behind the other votestraining jet would be really nice sometimes
oh yes - thank you very much qawa for pitworking
-
On my side, I found strange why most of you dont start to learn how to build a new AC model, a new skin or a new "features, instead to talk about it
I have tried it about 5 years ago with XSI/3DS. I found too complicated, I was not able to create skin palette even for a very basic 3D model. Even if I have skills in 3DS I have no idea how should anything imported into Falcon. Making skin is another issues, it is rather than art than ātechnicalā developing.
I have learned many things around DB and modeling and I do not have enough time even just for modding. I do not have hundreds or thousands hours to learn something besides my RL. From my aspect now new 3D models what are really needed for Falcon. Of course I can live with new cocpits and 3D models but this in not mine 1st priority.
-
EF-2000 and F14-D