If somebody could post some screens it would be nice i am far away from my PC and i would love to see how this actually looks
Best posts made by Rzax
-
RE: New lightning and vortices textures
-
RE: Wanna try the a-10 but…
You can change the Flight Model to Simplified in settings or else you need to trim that butch so much all the time. Looks like a problem in flight model i had the same thing when i tested it with my Warthog HOTAS ( never actually tried to fly empty plane ).
EDIT: Since i never had a chance to fly DCS A-10c I can’t compare it with anything else. I need to spend some time in A10 i guess.
-
RE: 4.35 U3 Rants, feedback, comments
Sorry to say that, but your system is waaaay too outdated. Dual Core CPUs are trash for anything nowdays, even just browsing internet will strangle that CPU as it will run at 100% all the time. There is no way you can get better performance out of it anymore. Not to mention the slow DDR2s
I threw away all dual core CPU systems at work already as they run really bad even with SSDs. ( and some of them were quite new )
If money is the issue then look for basically anything that isnt 14 years old and at least have DDR3s. You should be able to get way better PC even for like 200-300$.
Latest posts made by Rzax
-
RE: 8K texture enhancement for F-16 block 50 (BMS 4.35 U3)
@zero900 said
Maybe referring to a statement from ‘Raptor’.
Quote: “Old” “dirty” stuff are thrown out of real pits and then get sold to cockpit builders… lol"can be read here —> https://forum.falcon-bms.com/topic/20473/cockpit-skins-enhancements/3
Yeah that was the one.
-
RE: 8K texture enhancement for F-16 block 50 (BMS 4.35 U3)
Love it! But one thing the ICP wear is kinda too much, I rather have nice clean buttons
Somebody said that in real jets everything is getting replaced asap if it is getting worn out. -
RE: 4.35 U3 Rants, feedback, comments
Sorry to say that, but your system is waaaay too outdated. Dual Core CPUs are trash for anything nowdays, even just browsing internet will strangle that CPU as it will run at 100% all the time. There is no way you can get better performance out of it anymore. Not to mention the slow DDR2s
I threw away all dual core CPU systems at work already as they run really bad even with SSDs. ( and some of them were quite new )
If money is the issue then look for basically anything that isnt 14 years old and at least have DDR3s. You should be able to get way better PC even for like 200-300$.
-
RE: Jan Has F-16 LV5 Update packs
Yeah i noticed too that all Mavs, Aim 9X have messed up skin.
I am using JSGME to install the mod
-
RE: FPS of Intel HD 620 & Nvidia MX130
Yeah engine is really a CPU bound but even 5GHz on every core isnt enough. The more objects are around even simple ones like square buildings the less FPS you will get. I went from 4.6GHZ on my i5 6600K to 5Ghz with i9 9900KF and results are pretty much same. Installing JanHas models would crush FPS even more in that stock TE where the airbase is full of objects. Same stuff happens in Classic WoW where you get many players in one spot even with lowest settings your FPS will drop drastically because of how the engine handles everything yet both CPU and GPU usage will remaing below 50% ( usually only one core will run at 100% rest will be doin nothing. ).
For an example DOOM Eternal looks insane i play it on max settings with locked 150 FPS even in situations where you fight tons of stuff, shits exploding everywhere and still FPS will rarely drop below 140. CPU usually sits around 50-60% of usage and GPU around 95-98%. But ID Tech Enigne 7 is so well optimized its crazy.
Same problem with DX9 API is having remake of original Half Life game. The Black Mesa especially in the Xen level, there are few places where they packed soo many stuff that my FPS would get crushed and it will run at 50-70 FPS instead of 150 yet with low CPU / GPU usage. DX9 has its own limits yet see for yourself what you can achive with that
. The Xen looks better than most of new games running on DX 11 / 12 or Vulkan today.Just a quick note DX9 released in 2002 and the last 9.0c in 2005 so it is a 15year old API.
Lets hope that in 3-4 weeks we get some new nice DX11 BMS enigne which can take advantage of powerfull HW we have atm so we can enjoy better models and more static objects everywhere
-
RE: FPS of Intel HD 620 & Nvidia MX130
The engine shows its age sadly :(.
With my rig i still get down to even 40-50 FPS on ground in Osan_Taegu TE mission. While in DCS i get 80+ and comparing airborne FPS - DCS locked 150 FPS @22000ft above water / BMS rarely above 130+ in same scenario and a huge difference in utilisation - DCS uses 95%+ of GPU while BMS rarely 40%.Everything is 1440p maxed out also GSYNC monitor really helps even with that 40FPS when looking still you cant tell that you have 40FPS.
Upgrading from 6600k and GTX 1070 to what i have now basically didnt get me any extra performance at all in BMS .
-
RE: Post your BMS 4.33 Screenshots here!
Man that Instabul must be a brutal FPS killer ….
-
RE: Spawning of clouds distance?
Dude i even generated weather for every minute and then used it But something like 1 hour map change is better idea to stop having pop up clouds everywhere
-
RE: Modding Particle Sys.
I tested it yesterday aswell and i must say really impresive job. Those hi-res textures are a “blast”