https://www.falcon-events.de/public/mission/403

Merry Christmas to you guys!

@Mav-jp
First of all thanks to MavJP and especially to unleashedcode for the support. Actually I understood some things Understand me correctly: for years you fly tactics that work and suddenly (almost) nothing works. The 120 is the most important weapon in our squadron and the handling of it is essential, that might be the problem: we didn’t know that something elementary has changed. I always assume that the DEV team is trying to make BMS even more realistic. That should be the plan. Please communicate something like that, it’s important. Sorry for my somewhat harsh criticism, that was the result of a memorable evening of flying. Still, documentation of the changes in AMRAAM behavior and appropriate tactical guidance would be appreciated.

@Bloodhound161
We have intensively tested the AIM 120 today. It was very sobering. Partially, the missile did not track the target despite pitbull (!), even worse: the weapon performed a 90° direction change (what a bullshit).
The “Husky” mode is obviously no longer implemented Despite all the correct BVR parameters (which you can get from professionals as an interested layman) -> high altitude, fast, small M-Pole, perfect loft… the missile goes into nirvana. The magic forces of a MiG 29A are not even taken into account, the AMRAAM is simply seen through the clouds and exactly at the right moment I turn out with exactly the right speed… you can do it that way. But it’s grout. I love the challenge, but that’s not really possible. And when I read that TWS is actually no longer useful and you have to clarify everything in the STT… well. Since if this goes on there are alternatives in BVR with better graphics.
Sorry, I really appreciate your work but I’m really worried…

@dema what a beauty! I‘d like to paint a GAF one…. 🥰

@BlackGio yes, but I hope that someday (U1 maybe?) those will be an axis.

@MaxWaldorf

@Seifer said in AIM 120:

Actually the fix will not make into U1. U2 for sure.

Maybe for that reason?

@kouzi
Awesome! Would you share…?

@kouzi
Wow! Default BMS skin? Where can I find that beauty?

https://forum.falcon-bms.com/topic/22300/looking-for-an-icp

@dema what a beauty! I‘d like to paint a GAF one…. 🥰

@Kolbe-49th copy that

@MaxWaldorf

„AA Missiles logic and homing radar logic completely reworked for better realism (Fox3)“

That could also mean: now kill them all, everywhere and always!

Sorry, that only says that you have worked on the 120. Nothing more.
As I said, I appreciate your work very much, it is just missing the documentation here. And if you have not made it in time, it is also ok. I know it now.

@Mav-jp
First of all thanks to MavJP and especially to unleashedcode for the support. Actually I understood some things Understand me correctly: for years you fly tactics that work and suddenly (almost) nothing works. The 120 is the most important weapon in our squadron and the handling of it is essential, that might be the problem: we didn’t know that something elementary has changed. I always assume that the DEV team is trying to make BMS even more realistic. That should be the plan. Please communicate something like that, it’s important. Sorry for my somewhat harsh criticism, that was the result of a memorable evening of flying. Still, documentation of the changes in AMRAAM behavior and appropriate tactical guidance would be appreciated.

@BlackGio yes, but I hope that someday (U1 maybe?) those will be an axis.

@BlackGio no, not yet.