<blockquote>will the so called link 16 be implemented in 4,36?<br /><br />no<br />you need to face reality<br /><br />it is extremly complex to use and would need major upgrade of AI<br /><br />TBH when I read docs about Link16 I wonder how this would be possible to sue it without proper real training<br /><br /><br /></blockquote><p><br />Could you detail this?<br />I work on Link16 training (on a different platform). One day I tried to analize the possibility of having L16 on BMS, but I thought that it was not done before due to the limitations of the Falcon Bubble. On Link16 the C2 sends a J3.2 for surveillance tracks sending you the position of air hostiles, however on bms if the hostiles are out of the bubble, C2 can only send you what is seen on the 2D screen, right? This would mean that a hostile formation cannot be seen outside the bubble as several aircraft, but as a formtation of Xship aircraft, right?<br />Regarding the implementation of the TN management and network, that could be done automatically by the DTC, as the COMPLAN does now. Briefing page could extract even an OPTASKLINK. Then on the aircraft just power it up and syncro, and ready. <br /></p>
Best posts made by Jordan
-
RE: Quick update from the frontlines, 4.36
Latest posts made by Jordan
-
RE: Quick update from the frontlines, 4.36
<blockquote>will the so called link 16 be implemented in 4,36?<br /><br />no<br />you need to face reality<br /><br />it is extremly complex to use and would need major upgrade of AI<br /><br />TBH when I read docs about Link16 I wonder how this would be possible to sue it without proper real training<br /><br /><br /></blockquote><p><br />Could you detail this?<br />I work on Link16 training (on a different platform). One day I tried to analize the possibility of having L16 on BMS, but I thought that it was not done before due to the limitations of the Falcon Bubble. On Link16 the C2 sends a J3.2 for surveillance tracks sending you the position of air hostiles, however on bms if the hostiles are out of the bubble, C2 can only send you what is seen on the 2D screen, right? This would mean that a hostile formation cannot be seen outside the bubble as several aircraft, but as a formtation of Xship aircraft, right?<br />Regarding the implementation of the TN management and network, that could be done automatically by the DTC, as the COMPLAN does now. Briefing page could extract even an OPTASKLINK. Then on the aircraft just power it up and syncro, and ready. <br /></p>
-
RE: Tacview – Understand what happened during your last flight! (alternative ACMI viewer)
Hi,
As in Falcon, for online squadrons a very nice feature would be to have a “adress list” to remember the ip of different players that tipically host the tacview debrief. -
RE: Continuous crash without log file
I would post the log but it crashed me and sent me directly to the desktop with no log.
This happened to us in multiplayer KTO, on the veterans gaming multiplayer campaign, IRON FORTRESS. -
RE: Continuous crash without log file
Same here.
2 pilots out of 6 crashed today on a flight due to this issue. -
RE: F16 Brakes at 4 35
Once I saw a crew doing training at max effort landing dispatched without antiskid in a paved runway. First landing they made, two tires blew out. lol…
You are right, antiskid decreases landing distance always.
Airbus aircraft ANTISKID ON:
https://i.imgur.com/5SzqQdT.png
Same conditions ANTISKID OFF
https://i.imgur.com/XWvPmdx.pngOn most Airbus the procedure with antiskid off is braking manually with max 1000 PSI to avoid wheel lock,… so landing distance is increased.
You have to manually adjust brake pedals to brake less than 1000 psi, so that example is not valid here.
Flysmart just reflect that.Anyway, on cars normally ABS decrease braking distance as stated above, as a wheel locked has less friction coeficient.
-
RE: [F4RADAR] Lightweight standalone radar application
In principle F4A and F4R do more or less the same, but I wanted 2 things differently: 1. deagged entities 2. no hassle (no additional programs, no TE loading, no BE definition, etcetc). But yes, F4A contains quite some fancy features. I’ve had contact with Monster and he gave me some tips. But he admitted that currently he has limited time to maintain his programs.
Furthermore it’s fun the create a tool like this for the community and I have still plenty of ideas also not present in F4A. And a little bit of ‘competition’ never hurts.
For me, those two PROs makes this software very useful. F4A is great, but when you have 4 fighters on a CAP and in many other cases, you must see all the assets available.
F4A still have other very cool functions, like IVC integration.@tumbler31, we are trying to use it on our spanish SQN, and it seems there is a bug with the “Iberia Theater”.
Contacts are shown out of the map. -
RE: [F4RADAR] Lightweight standalone radar application
Awesome tool! Have you considered adding the type of aircraft on the contact info? Or to classify it manually by association?
-
RE: On call CAS procedures
We’ve made a webinar with a RL german airforce JTAC. Maybe thats also informative for you guys:
Thanks! Could you share the checklist? Looks very clear
-
RE: Spanish translation of 4.34 training manual
Contact “BlackDuke” on the escuadron111 forum via PM (http://www.escuadron111.com/foro/).
He have translated most of the manuals of the 4.33. Maybe he can help, or you can be coordinated.