@Red:
Nah, Spook
This is what triggered my Lol, not your post
The above is so typical.
Recommending to add something in the manual, while it wasn’t even checked and sure enough, it’s there already ….
At least when we reference the manual in a RTFM, we check first
the same courtesy should be done when one actually suggest we should add something 🙂
Because I see a lot of concern about respecting users because they might not have time to check the manuals before asking questions. Or because the task is too daunting or the manuals too impressive.
But I don’t see the same kind of courtesy for those who spent time on their freetime to write the manuals to help others in the first place 🙂 however daunting the task was.
So typical of the community voice.
Take, take, take. ask more, don’t use, ask more, complain, don’t use, ask more, take take take.
Luckily I am grown enough to see that it’s a minority that is vocal about this. The majority is silent and enjoy BMS 🙂
And I know our time is well spent for them 🙂
Then perhaps you could have mentioned this back at the beginning of this post, or at least mentioned this when the discussion turned to editing the cfg. You didn’t. Was all that discussion simply a mute point to you? If people do not read the manual and ask questions here about that, I understand that they need to read the manual. But this discussion was about FPS between bms builds. Coming across someone who edited the cfg. lines to get better performance should have stated this was in the manual, or you should have. Instead it became amusing for you. I don’t find that amusing.
Edit: Also, I have very little free time these days. What Little time I have is already spent. Haven’t even loaded 4.331 yet, let alone read the entire manuals from 4.33 Since you have more time than I do, I can see why this is funny to you.