Falcon bms at 4K?
-
What kind of system do you need, to run falcon at 4K smoothly?
-
Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 2080 Ti will run games in 4K with all settings maxed out at high FPS (over 30FPS, which is not easy in 4K)
To quote Tom’s Hardware:
"Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is the first card we’ve tested able to deliver smooth frame rates at 4K with detail settings maxed out. Its halo features aren’t used in any games yet, but as those come online, the Turing architecture is expected to shine even brighter.But what if we told you it also beats Nvidia’s Titan V? In Battlefield 1, GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is 20% faster. In Forza Motorsport 7, the 2080 Ti enjoys a 22% advantage. Based on the two cards’ specifications, we weren’t expecting such a dramatic finish. Although the $3000 GV100-based Titan V is made for deep learning and not gaming, those results sure put GeForce RTX 2080 Ti’s $1200 price into context."
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/nvidia-geforce-rtx-2080-ti-founders-edition,5805.html
-
I’d be interested in knowing if it was worth it ?
-
What kind of system do you need, to run falcon at 4K smoothly?
You don’t need powerful GPU to run BMS in 4K.
My scpecs:
[email protected],
16 GB RAM,
GTX 970,
Win 10 64 Bit
55 inch TV 4K 3840:2160
HDMI cableit’s more than enough for BMS to run on 55 inch TV and 3840x2160 resolution with constant 60 FPS inside the cockpit and 100 in external view…
Here, how it looks in real time:
-
You don’t need powerful GPU to run BMS in 4K.
My scpecs:
[email protected],
16 GB RAM,
GTX 970,
Win 10 64 Bit
55 inch TV 4K 3840:2160
HDMI cableit’s more than enough for BMS to run on 55 inch TV and 3840x2160 resolution with constant 60 FPS inside the cockpit and 100 in external view…
https://www.mediafire.com/convkey/3760/r11whdy97n7e4534g.jpg
well can u please do the same in campaign day 1 or 2, inclement weather, over the flot with TGP and WPN page active and report your FPS?
-
well can u please do the same in campaign day 1 or 2, inclement weather, over the flot with TGP and WPN page active and report your FPS?
No problems here at all. And your right, stuffing all of that through your rig (inclement weather, FLOT, ect.) would start to drag everything down for most computers. For BMS, it is not the GFX card that gets the better performance. It is primarily (and always has been) the CPU. If the GFX card can do 4K resolutions, the CPU needs to process faster to keep up with the higher resolution. Need a good GFX card? Yep! Need a good CPU to keep up with it, YEP!
-
No problems here at all. And your right, stuffing all of that through your rig (inclement weather, FLOT, ect.) would start to drag everything down for most computers. For BMS, it is not the GFX card that gets the better performance. It is primarily (and always has been) the CPU. If the GFX card can do 4K resolutions, the CPU needs to process faster to keep up with the higher resolution. Need a good GFX card? Yep! Need a good CPU to keep up with it, YEP!
Known.
I just wonder how the 970 would perform. -
I get the same FPS as Berno using the 970 (it’s a crazy good 970, one of the best) and I use a 24" 1920x1080 PC gaming monitor at 144Hz – all GFX settings on high, etc.
But my monitor is a gaming monitor, so I can trust that it’s refresh rate is in-line with what the GFX card expects, top left to bottom right pixel by pixel refresh at 144 times every second. This means when I see the FPS report from the game at the top right, I can trust that my monitor is in sync with it. Unfortunately, that is not the case with many TV’s used as monitors. The video looks great, though I’m watching it on my gaming monitor so color and contrast could be quite different than what Berno sees, and I’m happy that Berno is happy with his system… but there is a but: “But generally, TV’s don’t make good PC monitors for the simple fact that they are a TV”. It’s the PPI that really suffers though, but to each his own. Just a bit of unsolicited advice from an armchair PC pro.
“TVs can be advertised with high refresh rates (120 or 240hz usually), but that is a lie. A very sophisticated lie, but a lie. That is not real refresh rate. Just like Dynamic contrast ratio is NOT contrast ratio, or 8bit+AFRC is not true 10bit. These are nice things to have, especially AFRC… it’s really just like 10bit for my eyes… But not the real thing.
Only monitors have have real “true” high refresh rates right now as of my knowledge. So in case you want 144hz or 240hz, you’ll need a monitor.” -
well can u please do the same in campaign day 1 or 2, inclement weather, over the flot with TGP and WPN page active and report your FPS?
FPS around 30-40 over the FLOT, 50 over the Seul and around 60 outside - which is playable in that havy environment.
(Note that most shaders and rain effects are on, cousing FPS drop)and I’m happy that Berno is happy with his system… but there is a but: “But generally, TV’s don’t make good PC monitors for the simple fact that they are a TV”.
I have decent Samsung Full HD 24" LED Monitor but I’m using it only for browsing and there is no comparision - even with 60 Hz TV. For me it’s better to see more and “know” more than just to have a better refresh rates.
Matter of taste, but in order to “benchmark” - you need to test both sides first, right? If you do you may change your mind - like I did. -
I have decent Samsung Full HD 24" LED Monitor but I’m using it only for browsing and there is no comparision - even with 60 Hz TV. For me it’s better to see more and “know” more than just to have a better refresh rates.
Matter of taste, but in order to “benchmark” - you need to test both sides first, right? If you do you may change your mind - like I did.I hear that. I’ve done a bit of gaming this summer on various monitors, TV’s, and a couple projectors, too, while visiting my Father in Wisconsin. Matter of taste is very right! He was unable to notice many of the points that I raised as he’s never used this monitor I have out in Oregon – the ASUS 24" 1920x1080 @144Hz. I was surprised how rough they all seemed, and after returning to my ASUS at home, I put my finger on it immediately: refresh rate and PPI (pixels per inch). That being said, my ASUS monitor is around 18" (or less) from my face and all the TV’s and projectors I tried were at least 6 feet away. Had to set up my TrackIR on a tripod, lol.
I had a difficult time dogfighting especially. Finding the enemy bird against the vast blue sky was harder than ever and I believe it came down to the quality of the image I was seeing, and after much reading and edumacating myself, I came to the conclusion that after using this ASUS of mine, it would be a step backwards for me to use anything for my main monitor that was less than a 120Hz PC monitor. Again, definitely a matter of taste - and of course, I didn’t have access to the specific TV you (berno) have. I liked the projectors, but there was a clear difference between the $200 model and the $600 - and I see why some people use projectors that cost well over $1000, but even if I had the money, I’d still invest it in the PC monitor industry before the TV industry as they just operate differently and I’ve seen it with my own eyes.
-
Out side doesn’t count for me but thanx for knowing.
Well I don’t see the wpn active but I believe if your reports are not and with active wpn (display terrain and targets) then u would loose what? 5 more fps?
Hmm very good performance.
I really enjoy and am grateful that with BMS, guys that don’t have the pocket for supper trooper PC setups can enjoy it’s majesty.Sent from my MI 5 using Tapatalk