[Released] EMF v1.0.3a (BMS 4.34)
-
I need your opinion.
I’ve added all HAF JanHas LV4 models into the EMF database, alongside the EMF default ones. So, if someone wants to save some FPS he gain select the non Janhas models as well. I’ve also added the Polish F-16 and the new Aggressor skin.
Do you want to add all the rest JanHas LV4 F-16 models on top of the 4.34 default ones? (F-16 MLU, CM40, CM50, so on) or should I leave the default ones? I cannot add LV4 models alongside the default ones, 'cause the DB would increase beyond an acceptable level. I mean entries wise, not size wise.
Νακο i think HAF all F-16’s THK all F-16’s and USAF Block 52, for now, is more than enough …any estimated time of release?
-
what maintenance?
You didn’t get it.
The options are 3.
1. all default stock BMS models.
2. all Jan Has (what Jan Offers and are in the EMF DB) No new entries, just replace existing.
3. Your selection with Jan’s (which you will have to maintain in the future either wise, and the rest default , stock BMS.So what maintenance?
But I’m sure you are already on the wrong path and can’t go back as this should be considered in the very beginning? If so no point.
-
Ok, I’ll think about it. The new version will be released after 4.34 update 1.
-
What about as default BMS models for those with less powerful PCs, but instructions on how to install janhas models to EMF if you choose to?
Then it gives people flexibility for the theatre… Or does it interfere with multiplayer if one has janhas and the other doesn’t?
-
Has anyone experienced such an implementation to other theaters ?
-
Has anyone experienced such an implementation to other theaters ?
Most probably no to public ones.
why u ask? -
Because we would be again the first to implement this and I too believe will need an extensive amount of time for support/maintenance following any new updates, either bms or JanHas. It doesn’t worth the time to keep so many sub-versions, and I personally don’t have the low/average pc -aspect in mind.
-
errrr we are talking about xml comparisons here.
This can be done even with excel.
Yesterday I started with the CT table, vanila compared to EMF.
just playing around… if it’s needed and might help I could go on and try to make it a helpful tool.
spotting the differences is like a walk in the park.what would be needed or helping would be a 3 factors comparison for starters.
Like
1. BMS Vanila old (ex 4.34)
2. EMF Vanila (ex 1.03a)
3. BMS Vanila new (ex 4.34 U1)we already have the 2 of them.
we can create a 3 or use a different theater same file to see if it’s working as it should.Now the tricky parts are two:
1. is core DB inheritance - links and the depth in the tables and how to do it.
2. the 3d database and creating the scripts to update - inject entries or move them to the bottom as total new entries that will automatically will be in par with the core DB.Since we have the layed out guts of the 3d database there can be created a matrix of those, would he helpful if 3ddbuilder besides extract and build could export and xml having all those entries. but we can create it the hard way just by cmd dir to txt.
If we have such an xml for 3ddb then u have all the parts of the puzzle and it’s just implementation effort.now falcas says if u do so it’s gonna get fubared. I believe him but something inside me is itching me to try it out and releave my days of glory in excel doing unthinkable things.
Also to note here, there was supposed following the release of 4.34 wouldbe some announcements and releases of tools for db and etc… I don’t see anything still.
hmmm -
Ok, I’ve decided to keep it simple…
-
Hallo and have a nice day.
Please see whats happening in Kasteli airport(Grete)and the aircraft exlode before
they even enter to the corridor.This happens on a simple flight after i download EMF v1.0.3a hotfix. -
ok. I’ll check it
-
Hallo and have a nice day.
Please see whats happening in Kasteli airport(Grete)and the aircraft exlode before
they even enter to the corridor.This happens on a simple flight after i download EMF v1.0.3a hotfix.Fixed. Thnx
-
Iraklio also has some buildings and trees on the taxiway and runway (01)
Thanks
-
Iraklio also has some buildings and trees on the taxiway and runway (01)
Thanks
RW orientation seems to be off as well for LGIR, I think the main RW should be 09/27 (so east / west, not north / south as kall’s screenshot indicates).
All the best,
Uwe
-
Iraklion uses one of the default stock Korean airbase. It doesn’t have a customized airbase like the majority of EMF airfields. Hence, it’s a bit tricky to find a base that closely matches the real one.
-
Judging by the screenshot looks like it has and elevation issue? The runway start black part with big yellow arrows is missing or is in the ground or was removed from the airbase?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-T818A using Tapatalk
-
It’s not an elevation issue. Have to change few Areas on tiles and move an adjacent objective.
-
possible to get the parent numbers of 50, 52+ and 52M so we can install Janhas new models please.
Thanks
-
Iraklio also has some buildings and trees on the taxiway and runway (01)
Thanks
Fixed and the airport has been rotated to 09/27 orientation as per reality
-
possible to get the parent numbers of 50, 52+ and 52M so we can install Janhas new models please.
Thanks
I’ve included them for the upcoming EMF release, however, if you are eager to try them then use HAF F-16C 347 (BLK50): 5753
HAF F-16C 393 (BLK52+): 5765, HAF F-16C 393 CFT (BLK52+): 5763 and for the 52M use parents 1883 and 1325 (CFT)