Su flight model please
-
This post is deleted! -
MiG-25’s engine data at, idle, mil power and with full AB!
This seems to me the ful AB data of MiG-23ML’s enginge.
http://www.leteckemotory.cz/motory/r-35/r35_graf2.gif -
MiG-25’s engine data at, idle, mil power and with full AB!
This seems to me the ful AB data of MiG-23ML’s enginge.
http://www.leteckemotory.cz/motory/r-35/r35_graf2.gifCool find……thanks
-
Even though the AOA tape reads 30 degree.
-
AoA tape = ACMI? Bceause I asked where comes the AoA data.
Support
For missiles in Tacview, AoA values are based on the difference between the current course and previous one (0.5 second before). Because it is not applicable for such objects, the computation do not take into account the “aircraft” wings orientation.Me
Does this mean that AoA is counted from trajectory regardless that AoA comes from dat files aero data by using missile speed + turn radius?Support
That’s right, the AoA is actually calculated by Tacview. If the VHS files contains an AoA value, I should be able to display it soon because my advanced telemetry module begins to work.I discovered the issue during missile test. Falcon’s AoA display is almost close to 0, but in Tacview does not. (I have pro version.)
-
AoA tape = ACMI? Bceause I asked where comes the AoA data.
AOA “tape” in cockpit, not ACMI
Cockpit anolog display reads 30 while external view displays 33 degress
Edit: Ill do a screen shot of a constant speed/AOA/alt and then measure the values. Crude but of some worth.
PS, we are testing in MP.
-
what’s the limit of the analog gauge?
-
what’s the limit of the analog gauge?
35 degree ……hits 30 and thats it.
Not to be trusted maybe ???
Regards…Shad
-
The in pit gauge will only display 30 degree max, not max actual AOA.
Problem sorted.
……Shad
-
-
Nice mate.
Some tweaking for this but you never know.
-
-
Nice mate.
Some tweaking for this but you never know.
Blast those noze dancing, canard flapping 33s I hate there FLC……bastards
-
Ill try seperating the throttle in the morrow & give the flat spin a go……
-
Ill try seperating the throttle in the morrow & give the flat spin a go……
But what is the point to taunt a simple FM? normal result you will not get аnd it’s not even in the FLCS
Also get a bunch of bugs and problems with the AI
Even with the AFM, I strongly doubt that this can be modeled
BMS in the present modification of the Su-27 with thrust vectoring?
Sorry quoted the wrong post
@Shadow: -
@OSD:
But what is the point to taunt a simple FM? normal result you will not get аnd it’s not even in the FLCS
Also get a bunch of bugs and problems with the AI
Even with the AFM, I strongly doubt that this can be modeled
BMS in the present modification of the Su-27 with thrust vectoring?WTF are you talking about……“seperate the throttle” has nothing to do with Flight Model, it refers to using the differential function of the “Warthog” two part throttle, left & right.
Theres no “thrust vectoring” with the SU-30MKK as you well know.“Also get a bunch of bugs and problems with the AI” so you’r never seen the AI do impossable stuff before.
We have been flying the SU-xx family for a few years now & will keep a eye on AI for introduced abnormal behaviour.
“But what is the point to taunt a simple FM?” because its to simple !!! And in some respects broken.
And i’m haveing a lot of fun as well as learning stuff while im doing it.Regards …Shad
-
Cool Vid on SU-30 construction
-
Rebel has graciously found the time to help out.
-
Rebel has graciously found the time to help out.
wow must go as default for bms…
Since bms supports vstol than sure thrust vectoring for the su 30 should work…
-
It works OK but the SU-30MKK has the best default loadout without modding the DB but in RL hasn’t the thrust vector or canard, but still very agile.
My FM is realy the SU-30MKI or SU-30MK ect
As the Su35/37 were never in production & their DB model in Falcon is lacking I rejected them as options to play with.
If we can get the 35 renamed as 30MK that would be sweet & a viable base to work off.
Cheers……Shad