JF 17
-
Hi guys, working on a jf17 model, just a sneak peak
-
Update:
-
@okayasugf Very ,nice start !! Please keep is in touch ! Can you post more screenshot ?
-
@Radium
yes, i will keep updated as the process goes on. Its a big undertaking as i intend to make it as close to full fidelity as possible. Can’t post more screenshots due to imgur error on forum. -
@okayasugf yeah Imgur is over, I registered separately and post pictures here, you can do it too !
-
@Radium
Yeah it works this way, thanks for the headups.
Update:
Started working on cockpit. Looks very empty rn, but will keep adding stuff as i go. Thanks for the support guys. -
@okayasugf Nice start ! Do you aim to work on canopy frame curvature ?
-
Wow best of luck with the project!
-
@Radium
yes, im still new so im not sure about going for positive frame curvature or negative frame curvature. What would you recommend, any advice would be very helpful. Thanks. -
@okayasugf what do you mean by positive or negative ?
-
@Radium
jets with all around bubble canopy are positive frame curvatures, and jets with negative frame curvatures are canopy which are part of the aircraft fuselage. -
@okayasugf Hello, sorry, I don’t get it !
-
@Radium
positive frame curvatue
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/55/Ready_for_flight_(11421552824).jpgnegative frame curvature
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Vijay-Sutrakar/publication/322926583/figure/fig1/AS:631609581658113@1527598867025/Demonstration-of-slot-type-surface-discontinuity-present-at-junction-between-canopy-hatch.pngJf17 canopy
https://defence.pk/pdf/media/jf-17-thunder-canopy.15757/fullfeels like the a mix between positive and negative canopy frame curvatures.
-
@okayasugf Sorry, I still don’t get it !!! But anyway, I trust your choice !