Korea '80s Theater
-
With keeping the HUD of B42 is not. As I see the Block 42 pit with legs was not a good choice. If the another version is available in next release maybe that version should be included. Which is your choice? I wait votes.
Soo I will start to play, first with 1982 campaigns. I will play partially manually controlled squadrons.
-
Perhaps add on option on the installer whether or not to have the pilot
-
@The:
Perhaps add on option on the installer whether or not to have the pilot
Also doable but first I have to find the legless version of pit.
I tried to imporve a bit more the “BARCAP behavior” but so far what I was able to get more and more TARCAP close to FLOT. It is not BARCAP and I have no idea whan happens in case BAI/CAS capable AC are not available because TARCAP and these missions are always generated in the same package.
-
I tried to imporve a bit more the “BARCAP behavior” but so far what I was able to get more and more TARCAP close to FLOT. It is not BARCAP and I have no idea whan happens in case BAI/CAS capable AC are not available because TARCAP and these missions are always generated in the same package.
I have had some success in this area.
Here is the original stuff, tasking only 3 Barcaps and not tasking any after and not in a logical place either:
Made some changes and I’m now getting this, and re-tasking of Barcaps is happening:
I’m also getting some Tarcaps mixed in.
C9
-
What did you changed? What slider settings were used?
-
-
Im very interested in this subject Cloud9.
Im curious especially as to why the BARCAPs were placed in the middle of south korea like that, in all the (limited) testing I did, the BARCAPs were in a similar spot to where you have there.
If such a conversation is to be had only over PM, I would very much like to be a part of it, at least.
-
non-vanilla?
-
@Cloud:
PM inbound.
C9
Because this is the BMS community, where Sharing doesn’t happen.
-
Because this is the BMS community, where Sharing doesn’t happen.
I PM’d Molni to merely ask him a question. There was no sharing within the PM. If you don’t believe me ask him or Blu3wolf!!
You really should not post garbage and accuse me of not sharing(personal attack), when you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
C9
-
Because this is the BMS community, where Sharing doesn’t happen.
It may be because Cloud9 is actually Ram22 which was banned from here some time ago… so in that respect I understand his discretion.
-
It may be because Cloud9 is actually Ram22 which was banned from here some time ago… so in that respect I understand his discretion.
If you have definitive proof that I am Ram22, then show it. If not then I also consider this a personal attack on my identity and I have reported your post.
Have a nice day……
C9
-
You gave the distinct impression that you figured something out that is valuable. Someone asked you “what did you figure out” and you respond “PM inbound.” The normal assumption is that your PM contains the valuable information mentioned. The natural conclusion is that you chose to deny others valuable info for no good reason. You must understand that this is the appearance. You can’t act like a victim creating such an impression.
I’ve been mostly successful in the IF campaign with a strategy of 1:1 interceptions from CVN/Korea airbases and BARCAPs from Japan. Every other strategy I’ve tried has always allowed bombers and attack aircraft through.
-
@Cloud:
If you have definitive proof that I am Ram22, then show it. If not then I also consider this a personal attack on my identity and I have reported your post.
Have a nice day……
C9
BMS Forum admins can confirm via the forum database this image was not doctored, and the response on your behalf is in fact from your username.
-
Because this is the BMS community, where Sharing doesn’t happen.
Why we should share something that we only testing and experimenting…? When we feel that something worth to release it will be released. No offense but your mood is quite strange… Or maybe it is time to demand to share WIP version of 4.33 and findings…? Hm…?
-
You gave the distinct impression that you figured something out that is valuable. Someone asked you “what did you figure out” and you respond “PM inbound.” The normal assumption is that your PM contains the valuable information mentioned. The natural conclusion is that you chose to deny others valuable info for no good reason. You must understand that this is the appearance. You can’t act like a victim creating such an impression.
And what he just described is par for the course around here.
-
http://i261.photobucket.com/albums/ii58/i8088/ram22_zps47a551d9.png
BMS Forum admins can confirm via the forum database this image was not doctored, and the response on your behalf is in fact from your username.
HAHA, LMAO, that is a PM YOU sent to me titled Hey Ram22. Doesn’t matter what my response was, no where does it show that I am Ram22, you’re trying to pull a rabbit out of your proverbial ARSE!!!
C9
-
You gave the distinct impression that you figured something out that is valuable. Someone asked you “what did you figure out” and you respond “PM inbound.” The normal assumption is that your PM contains the valuable information mentioned. The natural conclusion is that you chose to deny others valuable info for no good reason. You must understand that this is the appearance. You can’t act like a victim creating such an impression.
You can assume and come to some “natural conclusion” all you want. But unless you know what was going on, then you don’t know what you are talking about. And it’s all mere speculation.
And you think as ASharpe does that it’s ok to accuse persons, base on speculation/assumptions and natural conclusions??
C9
-
Hey guys … Nothing better to do in your lives???
… Personal input: I do not care if it is Ram22 or not as long as he doesn’t behave like him in the past.
Move on and try to post some interesting and valuable comments.
-
Thank You DJ.
C9