Suggestion for database, data supply
-
Not a yes/no answer probably
the 1990 F-4E manual shows GBU-24 and GBU-15 loadouts for the inner MAU-12s on 2/8.
the 1979 manual shows GBU-10s on 2/8 but not the basic MK-84s.It looks like they just forward mount them so the back does not go past the back of the pylon.
This photo with Pave Tack is test shot
https://nationalinterest.org/sites/default/files/styles/desktop__1260_/public/main_images/safsasa.jpg?itok=jfpLgfLbPave Knife was used operationally on those inner pylons and that looked massive.
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-flyE0V9j3E8/VOVp19Zqe8I/AAAAAAAACF8/9jWQJu1jvY4/s1600/RickHiltonPK.jpg
I got an image about the GBU-10.
-
Is there any way to set as way guidance values to model the three point guidance to the SA-2?
In the radar dat files are eng. range and other values which maybe helps to be engaged when I fly and SR-71 with ~M3 at very high.
I wished to test how accurate is the mode but so far I was not able to set the three point guidance.
-
Is there any way to set as way guidance values to model the three point guidance to the SA-2?
In the radar dat files are eng. range and other values which maybe helps to be engaged when I fly and SR-71 with ~M3 at very high.
I wished to test how accurate is the mode but so far I was not able to set the three point guidance.
I just checked SA-8.
The missile performs lead while in RL the ONLY guidance type is available the three point guidance… -
Because of my inaccurate data supply, the 2K11 KRUG / SA-4 Ganef’s missile is undermodeled.
Not the max. G of the missile is 6G but the target’s max. overload what the missile can track. This means roughly about 15G max. missile overload if we consider M0.9 target speed.
The first missile version had 4G target overload limitation.