@Mav-jp said in Unexpected HARM behaviour:
@kyros said in Unexpected HARM behaviour:
After multiple tests it seems the behaviour of the HARM is different than expected:
Setup:
- SA-2, SA-3 and SA-6 near the target steer point
- POS PB launch with in the active table only AAA (692) entered and in the tertiary table only the FCRs of the SAMS (202, 203 & 206)
Multiple times the launched HARM kills a FLAT FACE acquisition radar. This should not be possible since it is not mentioned in any of the tables.
When I select TBL 0 as tertiary table then I do get misses as expected.
Oops sorry yes this is absolutly expected behavior
When you specify a FCR and when it is not found. The system automatically searches for the corresponding EWR of the same system
This is to avoid to waste a agm88
Congrats you are the first one to see that feature by himself , only 2 people in BMS team were informed about that before and you wonāt find it in any manual
Use TI to avoid that behavior
So even if you only put the codes for the FCRās in the threat tables, the HARM will still go for the accompanying acquisition radars?