You might wan’t to try Typophile.com, it’s a very talented community that has helped me a number of times in identifying the fonts I needed. Maybe they can help you with the font part.
Latest posts made by pina
-
RE: Mig-29 cockpit
-
RE: Reversed PAPIs
I noticed it last at Kunsan, here’s a picture from the article section. Maybe it’s just local to Kunsan, but I seem to recollect it happening also at Osan
And it’s vanilla BMS with patch 7
-
Reversed PAPIs
It’s a really small thing but has bugged me for a while, is there a way to fix this? The red lights should be the ones to the right of the bar, while in BMS they are on the left.
-
RE: Kneemap POH 0.7.0
Uhm I just noticed that Covilha (LPCV) is still included. In real life it has been demolished and is now a huge telecom datacenter (maybe a nice campaign target?). Is it still too late to change this?
-
RE: Kneemap POH 0.7.0
I took a look at the Moroccan AIP, their range is only GMD 06.
http://www.sia-aviation.gov.ma/eAIP/ENR/ENR5.1.pdf -
RE: WIP: P3 Orion.
Orion? What role can have in Falcon4 an ASW AC…?
Not sure if it’s a standard thing or not, but portuguese orions are capable of launching AGM65, AGM84 and the Mk series bombs, and are used amongst other missions for TASMO, and of course ASW. Their main thing right now during peace time is ISR and SAR.
-
RE: Kneemap POH 0.7.0
Not sure about the white cloud behind it. Have you tried white with purple stroke? Or the reverse, purple with white contour. It doesn’t need to be to wide, just 1 or 2 pixels of stroke wide, just enough to separate it from the background. Also, design student tip, avoid pure colors, try washed off shades of colors, they aren’t so aggressive on the sight. Besides that, all of the above said by ney
-
RE: Kneemap POH 0.7.0
Hello Joe, this is how it looks like in Jeppesen’s VFR sectionals.
187 is elevation in feet, 2459m is longest runway length. TWR is tower frequency. They only publish the VHF one here, but I think if you did like: TWR 118.100 249.0 it would be clear enough which one’s which. Also I think the ILS frequency isn’t needed here, it’s cluttering the chart and you really shouldn’t be looking for it there anyway, but rather in the approach chart.
-
RE: Kneemap POH 0.7.0
@Joe:
How to see the MEF data into map. How obtain the numbers?
This should be a good starting point, I have a paper VFR chart of 2013 and there are some discrepancies, but nothing to owrry about too much.
http://skyvector.com/?ll=38.92950240970293,-8.530334461931847&chart=301&zoom=5I think those numbers aren’t MEF but actually are MORA (Minimum Off Route Altitude), difference being MEF is the maximum elevation of terrain/obstacle, while MORA is MEF+1000 feet, or MEF+2000 feet above mountainous regions. I will try to check today with my instructors.
Not sure how the editors work, but isn’t there some option to show the highest elevation of an area or something like that?
-
RE: Kneemap POH 0.7.0
Hello, just did, turns out I was under the false impression that Korea didn’t have the distortion, but I checked and it does. Kadena is 7º east of the meridian. Seems like another of Falcon’s quirks. Does Falcon support magnetic declination? If it does it could be used to mitigate the distortion, otherwise I guess we’ll just have to live with it.