Test low-poly toys in BMS4..
-
Yes…
I originally got this trick from here: http://tactical.nekromantix.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=63&t=22228
Basically, you just have to add another “fake” gun. Lots of these low poly models have an emty centreline slot. Delete the “Empty” hardpoint and add another gun, the same as the main gun, with an ammo count of 1. For some reason, it works.
-
Yes…thank for the tip!
And thanks for digging out that 2007 post …9 years passed!
-
I apply the gun-only-fighter tweak to old ac, it works! thanks BFG!!
here’s the updated korea1950 test DB ver3. it contains most korea 1950 war related lods plus some WW2 stuff for fun. no more update in near future.
http://www.mediafire.com/file/nogamkag2072n0r/Add-On_Korea_1950_V3.zip
-
was MiG-17 hardcoded…or was this AC passive too (if gunzo)?
-
-
was MiG-17 hardcoded…or was this AC passive too (if gunzo)?
after gun-only edit, I can have F6F-vs-Zero work properly… and yes AI act more aggressive- yet not as aggressive as I expected. I also apply the edit to mig17 in 1950 korea ver3 test db… no test yet.
you can do the edit with F4brower or FalconEditor, then create a TE to test.
-
Does anyone know what .dds file is used for the AB on this .lod?
this lod has no textured-AB. I don’t remember it was ever added to FF DB.
-
In other news: can anyone explain (for idiots), how to add the F-8 dualie-racks to the db?
-
In other news: can anyone explain (for idiots), how to add the F-8 dualie-racks to the db?
Adding new rack model…need creating new CT entry…and edit rack group file.
Sorry it’s too complex for me…last time I did the edit and decided not to touch this part.Btw rack in bMS f8 looks ok.
-
the release of BMS kurile mod brings back old memories…
here’s UMF for those spent countless hours fighting in falcon3.0-kurile.http://www.mediafire.com/file/wotns15vhht864h/Russia_UMF_16-1025.zip
thanks Lukas for providing reference pic here…
https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?22293-DosBOX-screenshot-corner&p=402103#post402103
-
Remember when we thought that looked pretty good? I still have my copy of Nighthawk 2.0 the F-117A sim by Microprose.
-
Btw rack in bMS f8 looks ok.
Yes it does, unfortunately, I’m still flying FF, which doesn’t… : )
-
Yes it does, unfortunately, I’m still flying FF, which doesn’t… : )
I mean, you can check bms file to learn how bms edit the rack Lod and group file.
-
Ah, yes of course… : P
-
Luv it!
-
BTW older TU-22 was used in F3.0:
-
BTW, what the heck is that thing supposed to be?
-
defensive fighter - carried by TU-22 for self defense, Tu-22 onboard operator can fly them with joystick and is killing Yankees with his agile UMF without 9G limit…they are attached back to TU after the action
-
I am changing the Su27UB in a J10 two seat model;
Quiestion: when i replace the lod in falcon bms I can edit specific things in the, su27UB.dat file (simdata map) or I can edit in bms config editor. Are they linked or is one of these two things the ‘boss’.
-
I am changing the Su27UB in a J10 two seat model;
Quiestion: when i replace the lod in falcon bms I can edit specific things in the, su27UB.dat file (simdata map) or I can edit in bms config editor. Are they linked or is one of these two things the ‘boss’.
Ac.dat controls many things, mainly fm, AI, sound, physical parameters…the file represents the ac performance in 3d world.
FalconEditor or f4browser mainly link this ac to its fm, unit, loadout edits.files. And it edits some basic parameters for 2d world performance.