SimFuelDump still work in MP :(
-
Simple… just disable it in the dogfight module … and keep callback functioning in TE and Campaign. I think that is what he will do?
-
You missed the point (well, color me surprised). Use whatever justification you like for your request, but dont use as justification that its not realistic, because that is not your concern - as highlighted above.
Instead say what you mean, that you want it to be an anti cheat device for the game you play.
Didn’t realize that you were in charge of how people justify their requests or what they state in their posts.
Note to self: All posts concerning justification must go through the blue pooch first. Got it!
-
Could we change its behavior slightly from dropping 1,000 pounds per callback press to a toggle that dumps fuel at a more realistic rate? Pretty please?
-
@bill_3810:
Didn’t realize that you were in charge of how people justify their requests or what they state in their posts.
Note to self: All posts concerning justification must go through the blue pooch first. Got it!
Nah, if I was in charge, the thread would simply have been deleted for not going through me first. The ones in charge of what you state in your posts are the hosts, and what you are allowed to state in your posts is quite clearly laid out in the forum rules.
Still, those rules do not prohibit pointing out logical fallacies in others posts, so here we are.
-
hehe…from that perspective yeah. thx for addressing it btw Mav ! Good man.
He didn’t address it. He has a better view than you because this was already thought about before
You guys only see the direct issue, you need to see the big picture and the consequences a change may have.
The answer is maybe to avoid playing with cheaters.As for Bluewolf, please understand that ppl perfectly have the right to voice their issues and discuss it.
It’s not because someone requests something that it will be defacto happens. I like to think that the dev team does have a big picture in mind - most of the time thanks to teamwork)
So no need to be sarcastic with your answer and once again no need to abuse the reporting function because you don’t like the answer
Moderators decide the infraction to our forum rules, not you !! -
Could we change its behavior slightly from dropping 1,000 pounds per callback press to a toggle that dumps fuel at a more realistic rate? Pretty please?
The callback is used for stock TE by script (.run file) for EX: in Refuel Training Missions and need to dump fuels quickly. We need new another callback to dump fuels with F-18.
-
@Red:
As for Bluewolf, please understand that ppl perfectly have the right to voice their issues and discuss it.
It’s not because someone requests something that it will be defacto happens. I like to think that the dev team does have a big picture in mind - most of the time thanks to teamwork)
So no need to be sarcastic with your answer and once again no need to abuse the reporting function because you don’t like the answer
Moderators decide the infraction to our forum rules, not you !!Well, if this is where you would prefer to have that discussion - I see no issue with people voicing issues, nor discussion of those issues.
The purpose of reporting something is to bring it to moderators attention so that they may decide whether something is an infraction or not, of course. If the purpose is assumed to be to mark something as definitely being an infraction, it does make it senseless to make that system available to anyone who is not a moderator.
I have no issue with the answer, rather the trolling response (as per forum rule #7s definition).
-
Perhaps we can ask Tacview dev to implement fuel management check and see if someone used fuel dump cheat after each game?
-
Is that actually possible? Didnt think fuel remaining was captured by ACMI.
-
okay, let’s loose a bit of time, since we have to explain everything to you Bw:
you reported that post for violation of rule7 & 12
for the record, here is your first post and the answer to that post:
@Blu3wolf:Real F-16 also cant spawn midair either, so please disable the dogfight module in the same patch please
@bill_3810:
Didn’t realize that you were in charge of how people justify their requests or what they state in their posts.
Note to self: All posts concerning justification must go through the blue pooch first. Got it!our rules
7. Trolling, Attacks and Flaming: These are always forbidden.
•Trolling is posting in a way that provokes emotional responses.in my moderator perspective, the answer you got isn’t any more sarcastic than your initial intervention.
in police work, it’s called justified response equal and not escalating.
so if i have to consider that answer to you as trolling or flame bait, i have also to consider your intervention as flame bait.
Now since Bill has never been warned about anything but you have been warned multiple times due to your behaviour on this forum, guess what would happen?•Attacks and derogatory terms of any kind are not welcome
•Flames are messages that personally attack or call any people names or otherwise harass. These, along with any generally condescending posts will be edited or removed at the moderator’s discretion.
•If a thread is flame-bait (appears to be intended to start an argument or is likely to cause an argument rather than enhance discussion, as in trolling), it will be locked or removed without notice. Individual flame-bait comments in a post will be deleted or edited at the moderators’ discretion.
•If the thread turns into an argument, it will be closed to further comment or removed without notice. Sometimes a moderator may split the thread or remove certain portions in order to keep the discussion going, this is not always possible.
•Continuous or deliberate attempts to derail the topic of a thread.are not applicable part or rule 7 to this issue
then we have this last point:
•Repeated attempts to push the boundaries of any element of this entire policy that in the opinion of a moderator amount to a provocation or annoyance will result in sanctions just as surely as actual failure to follow the entire policy.
who’s pushing the boundaries here, Bill or you?
And to be complete:
12. Thread Drifting/Steering: Please keep discussions on topic. Please post in appropriate forums, under appropriate topics.
once again, the first who tried to drift the discussion out of its meaning was you, implying the dogfight module and not bringing anything of value to the discussion
if you want to play trouble maker, grow a thicker skin and please stop coming to cry on our shirts when somebody does the same to you - in the same sarcastic way