Post your Nordic TEs here
-
@Jackal
It comes from the “najoni” in the AMI. I am italian. -
-
Luke777 has another TE “white out” but i havent had time to test it.
unofficial copy is here to test. Gianni?
I deleted old white out from this post
-
Could not test it either, I will be home in a few days and will definitely give it try.
-
Ned ground, Gianni “Luce13”, ready to roll
With best regards,
-
New version of the TE White Out.
Aircraft BLUE side:
F-15 C/E
F-16CM50, F-16AM-NO, F16AM-DK
F-18 C/E/F/G
F-35 A
EF-2000 UK/GE
Tornado GR4, ECR I, ECR GE
JAS-39 Grippen
E-2
E-3
KC-135Aircraft RED side:
SU-27
SU-34 (not used in this version)
SU-24M (not used in this version)
MiG-29S
A-50Russia deployed fighter/bomber squadrons but has not sorted out logistics yet and can only defend at present.
NATO ceases the opportunity to attack EW sites, AB and air defense battalions with a massive operation.Future versions will have beefed up RED A2A assets and strike flights. It would just take too long to have it ready this way so I decided to release it at its current state.
It might seem a bit unbalanced in favor of the BLUE side. Any feedback is welcome.Huge thanks to Jackal for testing and providing great advice.
Cheers
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xjr87fhgrp3qoo1/White_Out_u1.7z?dl=0
Link not valid
New version
-
Good job Luke and Gianni , I put it to post 1 and am taking it home to look at as well!
Cheers
-
New version of the TE White Out.
It might seem a bit unbalanced in favor of the BLUE side.
Naahhh, just a little :lol:
You did a great job anyway, dear Luke, no doubts on that.
It have been a real pleasure keeping in touch and working together, I’d like to do it again soon.With best compliments and regards,
-
Naahhh, just a little :lol:
I tried it MP and we got kicked in the…,yeah right there, brutally :shock:
I am seriously rethinking about what I said :oops: -
ok i finally flew white out and found the US carrier flights go straight to debreif. because carrier objective is owned by Russia. I used Falcas’ MC to change Vinson to Enterprise, and all works fine now.
-
here is White Out U2 with fix. I will post it here and on P1 Luke777 may be busy a couple weeks so im posting it…
http://www.mediafire.com/file/uviahnlcil7492y/White_Out_u2.rar
cheers -
have been test flying White out , and it is a challenge! I like em that way. AWACS worked the whole time for my f18e sqdn off enterprise. I need to brush up on using harms, wild weasel techniques or something, the sams were wise to us and did not activate until we were right on them. they wiped out my wing-man and 4 escorts! I dodged sams, dropped stores, and gunned down the flaplid for the sa10s with my cannon. but the sa17s got me while I was going in circles with a bogey. maybe a su27? i didnt check. It cost the US 6 f18s to temporarily shut down the sa10s on that airbase. Then I tasked an AI package and we got our revenge on the sams and splashed some bandits on the runway as well!
nice job on this one for sure guys!
-
Thanks a lot for your kind appreciation, Ned…
but the better has to come still. And not in two or three Falcon weeks, I mean
Stammi bene, bellezza
Gianni.
-
nice ! i cant wait to see this new development you guys are working on. when we come back around to NTO V3 all these go into the theater for sure.
-
You are too kind for your appreciation in advance, dear Ned…
you will be among the very first to give it a glance
A nice day!
Gianni.
-
I post this here as this issue arose in the TEs I have made for the Nordic Theater although it is valid for every theater. The issue was AWACS not available for all teams except the team that owned the AWACS squadron; no matter what changes were made using MC in advanced flight options, advanced package options and team relations this problem persisted.
When building a TE you can’t add a flight to a package owned by one team using a squadron owned by another team by means of the TE builder; this can be done with MC though.
The way I proceeded was to create all the flights for each individual team and then assigned them to packages of the team that owns the AWACS squadron, when you do this operation MC will ask if you want to delete the flight you are reassigning: say NO. After this procedure is done only one teams owns all the packages; you are still able to see the specific flights of each team in MC units/flights.
Launch the TE and select any team, in the frag order there will be only the flights that belong to that team; select any flight, AWACS will be available.Hope to make sense, it is easier done than said.
Cheers
-
hi Jackal, Luke777, badger, and TE builders. after testing and fixing awacs probs in several TE now, i have decided to post a new TE_New file. any TE built with this file will not have com probs with awacs. this is a team setup issue on my end, and since i dont build TEs , i did not for see this issue. iwill post a vid on how i quick fix existing TEs and post new file Saturday. cheers Ned
-
Ned, thanks for staying on this, digging in and fixing the issue.
You ROCK!!:headb:
-
As you all will see its not really a bug, (this awacs issue), just very different set up then usual. also i made a te_new file that is exactly like KTO, but had to scrap it because it porks all current Nordic TEs by changing teams around. Sooo … I just made all but Russia team2 and they all share radar and awacs.
I will wait for feed back if …
1.you guys like this one better
2. want the old problem one back, or
3. want it set just like KTO with only two teams to start(this will destroy all current TEs)your input will decide how v3 will be set up , as I have no preference , I will pass the decision to our busy TE makers.
New TE_NEW Link includes a new stationils file that was was in updated Nordic … this isn’t needed. i left it on accident.
https://www.mediafire.com/file/nq9uliefc6zyvsr/Campaign.rarFIXING AWACS WITH TE Mission editer
Fixing it with TacEdit…. Sorry Falcas… I got a question before i can use MC to do this. a greyed out team No. is blocked from adjusting.
-
I like the idea to have more teams but that is my personal preference, whichever solution you decide to implement is fine with me. Current TEs might be recoverable anyways.
Cheers