B1 hyd/oil pressure light problem
-
Version
4.34.0 (x64)Build
19631Detailed Description
when flying the b1 I have warning sign showing up in the hud and the hyd/oil press light is on
in both the tactical engagement and campaign
Pictures
…Example files
…Crash logs
…Reproducibility Procedure
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.Expected Behavior
… -
B1 is not to be considered as “Flyable”.
-
What? in iron fortress 37th squadron its there I clicked on it took me to the runway
-
What? in iron fortress 37th squadron its there I clicked on it took me to the runway
Hey Boomer
True, but what Dee-Jay meant to say is that B1 ( as many other planes ins BMS) is not properly programed to be realistics for human fly.
I you what to dig a little i suggest you check the FM data file for the B1 ( if available) and try to check where its the problem.But again B1 is not one of the “flyable” planes in BMS.
You can fly it but it’s not realistic in any way.
Hope it helped.
-
hello it does have the fm dat file so I will try to find the problem thanks
-
It is not about FM … it is th fact that for most other a/c than F-16, M2000, F-18 and few other, you can fly them thanks to a hack (“set fly f16 only” with was 1 by default on original Falcon4) … There plenty of issues like this which won’t be fixed.
-
If it’s just the hyd/oil light lighting up he can try to increase the hyd/oil pressure in the dat only for the B1.
Again Dee-Jay is right on this one. Its non flyable plane per se so don’t expect miracles.
-
In 4.33 I flew the thing but I had to tweak the lift data the first line in the fm data because it would run out of runway and crash but thanks anyways
-
If it’s just the hyd/oil light lighting up he can try to increase the hyd/oil pressure in the dat only for the B1.
Again Dee-Jay is right on this one. Its non flyable plane per se so don’t expect miracles.
No Dee-Jay is not correct here.
Each and every AC is flyable in BMS. FlightModels are not as accurate as the F-16 though.
But all are flight tested for human and for human use.
The AI uses the same FM, so saying the AC is not flyable is saying AI is not acceptable and so the whole sim is not flyable. And sure you only have F-16 avionics, but everything like radar strength and detection and all that stuff is set as good as possible.Its only about do you like it or not.
If you don’t like it… don’t fly.But stop saying they are NOT flyable.
Gr Falcas
-
No Dee-Jay is not correct here.
Each and every AC is flyable in BMS. FlightModels are not as accurate as the F-16 though.
But all are flight tested for human and for human use.
The AI uses the same FM, so saying the AC is not flyable is saying AI is not acceptable and so the whole sim is not flyable. And sure you only have F-16 avionics, but everything like radar strength and detection and all that stuff is set as good as possible.It’s only about do you like it or not.
If you don’t like it… don’t fly.But stop saying they are NOT flyable.
Gr Falcas
Maybe i didn’t say it right what i meant was its flyable of course but Fm model for the B1 it’s not even tuned for it.
3D models of cockpits aside. Its flyable of course but needs a bit of “love” before its human flyable by any standards.
That was my point sorry if not clear at first.
-
Maybe i didn’t say it right what i meant was its flyable of course but Fm model for the B1 it’s not even tuned for it.
3D models of cockpits aside. Its flyable of course but needs a bit of “love” before its human flyable by any standards.
That was my point sorry if not clear at first.
@ Decimalminimal, this was not specific at you.
The problem is lack of data. Sure we can go to the US and start collecting manuals… but who knows how that will end up
Even the B-1 FM is tuned. No not lately and not in detail, but for 4.32 got released the B-1 FM got a much better flight performance.
Before that it was really bad. It comes close now.One more note on this.
Before the time of the Advanced Flight Model (AFM) Falcon only used the OFM. (which most of the non-F-16 uses)
At that time everybody was soooo happy. The best you will ever get.
Now people advice not to use it. That’s way overboard.
Imagine you in your F-16 escorting your buddy flying that B-1BIf someone wants to enjoy it, just let them enjoy it.
Falcon/BMS is so much more than a F-16. If you know the code and know what is all inside…
This is an amazing combat sim and the F-16 is in the center of it.Gr Falcas
-
@ Decimalminimal, this was not specific at you.
The problem is lack of data. Sure we can go to the US and start collecting manuals… but who knows how that will end up
Even the B-1 FM is tuned. No not lately and not in detail, but for 4.32 got released the B-1 FM got a much better flight performance.
Before that it was really bad. It comes close now.One more note on this.
Before the time of the Advanced Flight Model (AFM) Falcon only used the OFM. (which most of the non-F-16 uses)
At that time everybody was soooo happy. The best you will ever get.
Now people advice not to use it. That’s way overboard.
Imagine you in your F-16 escorting your buddy flying that B-1BIf someone wants to enjoy it, just let them enjoy it.
Falcon/BMS is so much more than a F-16. If you know the code and know what is all inside…
This is an amazing combat sim and the F-16 is in the center of it.Gr Falcas
100% with you falcas
I f not i wasn’t creating the alpha jet for months now.
Of course i try to make an AFm for it but OFM is fine too.
And yes i agree i have lots of fun with no F-16 planes in BMS.