Chengdu J-20
-
1. BMS4 is not a tank simulator. Land combat is simply more abstracted. This part of your comment is simply irrelevant because of this. Land combat is very, very, very abstracted and simplified because they are “just” targets. Didn’t you noticed in the older version in any Falcon how OP were the artillery? A simple arty battalion eradicated without any effort two full tank battalion. Because of this in my Korea '80s MOD for 4.32 I had to reduce seriously their size and qty.
2. The BMS4 is so accurate concerning of F-15 that you can reproduce within 1-2% accuracy the Streak Eagle climb records. Just set different empty weight and do not forget the weather. Yes, the weather setting is needed the winter temp. instead the spring/summer. When I tried first I simply did not understand what can be the problem. I set the temp and a “miracle happened”.
This was the most inaccurate because of more than 1 maneuver longer time and the exceptionally high alt which means you fly across the whole modeled atmosphere.
http://www.mediafire.com/file/fjxtwaz3gh36030/Streak-Eagle-30km.vhs/file3. The IOC term today is a very value lost term since the last 20 years. In '70s the IOC for F-15 meant it could go to combat with full armament. Not “if” and “and”. It could go. Period. For F-35 or any other jets today n+1 times you can read ‘now is in service’. Than later, ‘now is’… Do you know what means IOC for Rafale? Gun + SR IR AAM… For F-35? One type of LGB and AIM-9 on external. This meant the “IOC”…
It meant “fantasy” that you cannot set any of its modeling values. Even its empty weight is not known. You cannot model its features as quality and you cannot set its parameters considering values.
Of course go ahead but I simply cannot get it. Using this approach the next jet could be an X-Wing fighter…Can’t wait for him to make a X-Wing just to see what you will write.
-
I appreciate any effort
Most probably he doesn’t do it for you, right?
but I simply do not get the point of J-20
Aside it is HIS choice, to offer whatever HE wants, (similar for getting help for your 1980-era obsession etc etc), there might be other people here too that actually like the airframe and want it as a “structure” in bms. No? Count the thanks and positive comments.
The following things are missing to any 5th generation airplanes to be modeled. In fact for many 4th gen or even for the MiG-31.
To be honest, if you go down by the book, do you have any idea how many things are missing from our “F-16’s” ??? Do you want a LIST ???
Do you know how many CT records the DB should have, following this logic?
Of course anybody can develop as he/she wishes
Maybe this should be stated in the forum rules and end-user right too.
but would not better to work on such 3D models which are useful for every theater
F-16A would fit in what theaters?
IHMO
Just think that sentences starting with this 4 letters mostly point to a user ban in another forums lol !! (ehh DCS funboyz) / Joke mode off
But seriously, his answer was spot-on, IMHO.
-
Molni,
no need to try to push me to revoke my choice or to bring me cazy, it worked before, it won’t anymore.
I’m most peaceful because I enjoy my life, my real life job, my family, the fact that I will go to ski next weekend and because I enjoy being a BMS dev.
Enjoy your weekend !
-
1. Didn’t you noticed in the older version in any Falcon how OP were the artillery? A simple arty battalion eradicated without any effort two full tank battalion. Because of this in my Korea '80s MOD for 4.32 I had to reduce seriously their size and qty.
aha, i know how to fix this, but i need some time to recall.
i wrote it in here few years ago.The IOC term today is a very value lost term since the last 20 years. In '70s the IOC for F-15 meant it could go to combat with full armament. Not “if” and “and”. It could go. Period. For F-35 or any other jets today n+1 times you can read ‘now is in service’. Than later, ‘now is’… Do you know what means IOC for Rafale? Gun + SR IR AAM… For F-35? One type of LGB and AIM-9 on external. This meant the “IOC”…
“in service” for PLA means this weapon can be mass produced, and is being produced.
minor upgrades can be attached in the future, but upgrades won’t be allowed to interfere production speed. otherwise it is prototype, not in service. -
Most probably he doesn’t do it for you, right?
F-16A would fit in what theaters?Literally for every if you wish to leave the 2000s…
F-16A is my wet dream.“in service” for PLA means this weapon can be mass produced, and is being produced.
minor upgrades can be attached in the future, but upgrades won’t be allowed to interfere production speed. otherwise it is prototype, not in service.There is a huge difference between “accepted” and entered in service.
The service in less PR effected eras meant that the already mass produced airframes with trained regular pilots can be sent to any mission. For F-15 this mean when the first wing could be relocated to anywhere. -
-
The service in less PR effected eras meant that the already mass produced airframes with trained regular pilots can be sent to any mission. For F-15 this mean when the first wing could be relocated to anywhere.
PR? public relation? when did u see chinese last weapon PR? I, a chinese, never saw it on TV or internet. official weapon introductions r always short, 1-2 minutes in news. is this PR?
china is not in war now, so i dunno how to prove ur “relocate to anywhere”. maybe the entire PLA is not in service? -
Special for you Molni, no need to wait :
Priceless :nosep::llama:
-
This all topic is absolutely ridiculous.
@Radium - You as DEV should be feeding this kind of post. People indulge you too much, i don’t. Your work is amazing no doubt about it but that not all when it comes to BMS.
You are part of a team that is mostly concerned about other BMS aspects that deserve much more atencion than this new project. I will not point out how much the model will not be fully explored due to lack of AC information, nevertheless there are so many models that need care and dedication that i wonder once more why don’t you channel that creativity to here the community points out.
You can’t say “i do as i please” because you are part of the Dev Team. If you were a 3rd party modeller as i am you would be 100% correct.
What about F1CT that you abandoned?
What about the T-38 beautiful pit?
What about the F2?
What about the F18?You have so much unfinished ( and very useful to the community) projects yet you prefer to start one that will be very hard to come by some sort of IRL data. Even the surfaces work angles/velocities CL and CD tables for the most simple OFM data?
C´mon we are just saying. Focus your mind in the guideline of what the other devs are struggling to do.
My 2 cents…
-
Look who is talking now …. crème de la crème
-
This all topic is absolutely ridiculous.
@Radium - You as DEV should be feeding this kind of post. People indulge you too much, i don’t. Your work is amazing no doubt about it but that not all when it comes to BMS.
You are part of a team that is mostly concerned about other BMS aspects that deserve much more atencion than this new project. I will not point out how much the model will not be fully explored due to lack of AC information, nevertheless there are so many models that need care and dedication that i wonder once more why don’t you channel that creativity to here the community points out.
You can’t say “i do as i please” because you are part of the Dev Team. If you were a 3rd party modeller as i am you would be 100% correct.
What about F1CT that you abandoned?
What about the T-38 beautiful pit?
What about the F2?
What about the F18?You have so much unfinished ( and very useful to the community) projects yet you prefer to start one that will be very hard to come by some sort of IRL data. Even the surfaces work angles/velocities CL and CD tables for the most simple OFM data?
C´mon we are just saying. Focus your mind in the guideline of what the other devs are struggling to do.
My 2 cents…
I’m sorry.
I have absolutely no lessons to receive from you.
I injected 493 LODs into stock DB since I am a dev. How much do you know of this ?
I have no lessons to receive from you about what shall I do and what I shall not do, and your comparison with “Focus your mind in the guideline of what the other devs are struggling to do.” is simply disgusting.
I give your 2 cents back.
@Radium - You as DEV should be feeding this kind of post. People indulge you too much, i don’t. Your work is amazing no doubt about it but that not all when it comes to BMS.
I don’t give a yen about if you like me or not. With friends like you, I would not need any foe. What you see here is a fraction of all I do for our DB.
Happy evening,
Radium
-
Look who is talking now …. crème de la crème
Did i mentioned you?
We need a mod in here please.
-
Did i mentioned you?
We need a mod in here please.
I’m not sure between you and him who would be moderated…
-
You all really need to chill.
What a festival of misunderstanding! -
I’m not sure between you and him who would be moderated…
I was polite to you and just made my opinion didn’t i?
And i reinforce my point. Keep being the best modeler around but focus your strength in what really push the community forward…
-
Gentlemen!
What are we talking about here? The aim of BMS has always been to be creative and pretty, even if that means to release half baked add-ons. Let’s not stop producing stuff just because there is no way to get reliable data. Who wants a handbook nowadays? Actually, I think it is about time it is implemented a single autostart shortcut like Ctrl-E in MS FS.
-
Gentlemen!
What are we talking about here? The aim of BMS has always been to be creative and pretty, even if that means to release half baked add-ons. Let’s not stop producing stuff just because there is no way to get reliable data. Who wants a handbook nowadays? Actually, I think it is about time it is implemented a single autostart shortcut like Ctrl-E in MS FS.
You can’t be serious are you?
BMS was always about having the most reliable data possible and achievable. Sometimes we can make it sometimes we don’t.
-
:munch::yawn:
-
Hi Molni!
I appreciate any effort but I simply do not get the point of J-20
Simply because we are dealing with what ppl offers. And Radium offered (way largely) enough to deserve some liberty to get what is pleasing him. As simple as that.
As you well know, contributors do what they like to and works at the rhythm they like/can. Anything offered (and fitting with requirements) is welcome as long as it will also fit on the main theater or generic enough deserve a place.
Radium is not paid … not committed to work for us. So while I do agree on many points you’ve mentioned (same somehow applies to cruise missiles, anti-missile features, towed decoys, UAVs) , nobody is forced to use them. And not doing something that could be qualified “out of scope” do not mean that Radium will do an F-22, on F-35 or a new set of the Su-27 family.
For the “cost” of one FCK-1 => Radium offered a Ka-52, UH-1 … etc …
Maybe that for the “cost” of one J-20 => Radium will offer a new A-50, Il-76/78 … or SR-71 … or F-22 … or SA-15 vehicle … or …It is a win - win compromise. Almost everything here works that way on Dev side.
Everybody takes benefit from this.
And anyway … the one who is “right” is the one who is working and producing.
Regards to all.
-
I have absolutely no lessons to receive from you.
Your lack of humility is amazing. We all learn and help each other around here.
I injected 493 LODs into stock DB since I am a dev. How much do you know of this ?
Point being? You can make all the DB again for all i care. I just point you out for the many abandoned projects you have around here.
I have no lessons to receive from you about what shall I do and what I shall not do, and your comparison with “Focus your mind in the guideline of what the other devs are struggling to do.” is simply disgusting.
Strong word. There are many devs around here, some that help you out that help also. What i feel is that you are a cowboy that feeds this useless arguments (both sides) it’s everyone’s fault really.
I don’t give a yen about if you like me or not. With friends like you, I would not need any foe. What you see here is a fraction of all I do for our DB.
Strong words again. The only time i speak to you was crystal clear to me that you will never help me out in anyway because i’m a “farse” of modeller that uses sometimes previous used (full granted) work.
What you see here from my side also. I’m quite involving in other 3rd party 3D modeling that you are not aware of. And i suspect you will never even see because im true believe that you don’t give a crap for 3rd party work.