ITO 1.07.0v Bugs
-
@vAiCon said in ITO 1.07.0v Bugs:
Fix has been applied to the model (Su-22)
What fix are you talking about? Because the Su-22 is having the same issue.
Thanks
-
@VDK data issues which not aligned with the model
-
@vAiCon so, the issue with flight model mechanics persists right? I’m talking about aircrafts landing gear invisible, afterburner invisible and wings sweep also invisible.
-
@VDK said in ITO 1.07.0v Bugs:
@vAiCon so, the issue with flight model mechanics persists right? I’m talking about aircrafts landing gear invisible, afterburner invisible and wings sweep also invisible.
-
@CriticalMass said in ITO 1.07.0v Bugs:
I’m playing through the training missions and the JDAM popup scenario suggests that there should be loft solutions and pull-up cue. These don’t appear. I’m unsure if this is a bug or an issue with the documentation or if I’m doing something wrong.
Wow, 3 months to the day. Any thoughts on this? Anyone?
-
@vAiCon said in ITO 1.07.0v Bugs:
@VDK said in ITO 1.07.0v Bugs:
@vAiCon so, the issue with flight model mechanics persists right? I’m talking about aircrafts landing gear invisible, afterburner invisible and wings sweep also invisible.
Well… i think i have an issue then…
My Su-22 keeps the wings straight foward even at Mach 1.0 and above, afterburner invisible and so on…
-
@VDK said in ITO 1.07.0v Bugs:
@vAiCon said in ITO 1.07.0v Bugs:
@VDK said in ITO 1.07.0v Bugs:
@vAiCon so, the issue with flight model mechanics persists right? I’m talking about aircrafts landing gear invisible, afterburner invisible and wings sweep also invisible.
Well… i think i have an issue then…
My Su-22 keeps the wings straight foward even at Mach 1.0 and above, afterburner invisible and so on…
Please, disregard that information!
I change the value “its complex” on aircraft data (inserting 1 instead of 0) and now it’s fine
Thanks!