Pyongyang Political and Governament targets
-
Sirs,
it is an honor to suggest something challenging again here in this excellent simulator.
I was looking a flight on Tatical Engement in Korea where Pyongyang was the target, and I didn’t find any political or governmental targets there. I was nostalgic like in Baghdad in 1991 wanting to attack targets like the Building of the communist party in North Korea, or the ministry of truth or even the crazy fat man’s house.
I suggest modeling these targets in the city in the next version
cheers
-
-
@gusva following another thread, may I suggest you deepdive into what is BMS, how campaign are organized, objectives created and assigned, …
That would prevent having posts that unfortunately are not bringing the value you’d wish and also understand what the future is bringing.
On top, that would prevent @Aragorn from making jokes that are just funny to himself.
Cheers
-
@MaxWaldorf
Make Aragorn Great Again! -
@MaxWaldorf thanks for your patience. I hadn’t been clear when I carried out a mission in the city, it wasn’t during the campaign but rather training at TE. In fact, during the campaign I would change the logic of the code, including the weight of public targets, and that was not the objective in this post. Only the modeling of public buildings as a target at first.
I’ve been following Falcon since Falcon 1.0 on CGA monitor, and I’ve played all versions, FalconAt, Falcon 3.0, Falcon4.0, AlliedForce and Falcon BMS. The complexity of the campaign is in fact, as Pete Bonani puts it, war engineering modeled after Falcon 4.0. The development complexity is very high.
I always look out for some points to be improved, the details in meteorology I had already talked about in the past. And now this one came up. But it’s only 5 cents my opinion.
Cheers,