Map and NavAids for Middle East 128 for BMS 4.37.3
-
- Work in progress -
Web site for upcoming maps and NavAids for MidEast128 for BMS 4.37 U3:
[https://www.quebecairforce.com/Commun/Sim_BMS/Ref/Theater/MidEast128/](url du lien)Map (PDF):
[https://www.quebecairforce.com/img/sim_bms/ref/theater/mideast128/QAF_MidEast128_Airbases.pdf](url du lien)NavAids (PDF):
[https://www.quebecairforce.com/img/sim_bms/ref/theater/mideast128/qaf_mideast128_navaids.pdf](url du lien)As today, I’ve mainly focused on “Coalition airports and Air Strips”. More updates for other country will follow soon.
Merry Christmas Falconners!
-
Hello my friend.
Congratulations for your work, well done!
2 notes in order to improve your work and give reality, IF I may.
As you can see here: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp;ATTACHMENTS=MOKswzruxd7nk9g3rh0feUtiWJ6zXtaudmpOINW2hG_hNhOwaKUy!1404911115!-1938646690?applType=search&fileKey=1452295510&attachmentKey=18444263&attachmentInd=applAttach
the ILS LOC frequency range is: 108.10 - 111.95 MHz with step 0.05 but only the odd as first digit , means : .10 , .15 , .30 , .35 , .50 , .55 , .70 , .75 , .90 , .95 .
That means that ILS of 111.60 at Al Asad, 109.65 at Al Iskandariyah New, 111.85 at Al Taji, 110.25 at An Numaniyah e.t.c. are not proper.
Also very rare you may see the same ILS frequency at both RWY ends, for safety reasons.
You have at Doha International the 109.60 (that is wrong as a value) for both RWY 18 and 36. You can for example give 108.50 for RWY 18 (it’s for real RWY 15) and 109.50 for RWY 36 (it’s for real RWY 33).
Again Bravo for your efforts. Go ahead.
Nikos. -
@neystratiou
Hi Nikos,I’d like to take this opportunity to congratulate you on all the work you’ve already done on the approach charts. A colossal work on your part that inspires me a lot! Congratulations on all your hard work.
I totally agree with what you said about ILS frequencies.
I’m already aware of these parameters, but I’m not the author of this theatre. It’s beyond my skills!
I’ve learn this from BMS documentation. Thanks for your file anyway. I will keep it as another reference.I relied on the file “Falcon BMS 4.37\Data\Add-On Mideast128\Campaign*stations+ils.dat*” from this MidEast128 theater which already has these ILS data. We probably have to inform “SpbGoro” to correct the ILS frequencies.
Here is the data found for “Irak Al Asad” in station+ils.dat of this theater (via Mission Commander print screen) as an example:
I was just exploring this theater and the “NavAids List” was a bit outdated (NavAids list for BMS 4.34 was provided in the Docs folder of this MidEast128 theater!). I hope a newer documentation will be provided in a next relase of MidEast128. If I can help a little bit, I will be happy to provide my NavAids Excel worksheet to the MidEast128 doc team, if requested.
Happy to meet you here Niko. I hope to learn more from you in the future. If I can help you for something, ask me…
-
Hello again my friend.
First of all, Thank you very much for your kindly words!
Persons like you give meaning to what I did for 8 years here at BMS forum.
Nice to see a friend that inspired by me to take the lead ahead, this is great!
Well since this is a work by other developer and you simply “follow” his work, contact him to express the real rules about the ILS Loc frequencies. Then IF he wants, he can correct them and then you can update and release a new version of Nav. stuff away of these errors.
I see at Mission Commander to “accept” as normal the ILS Loc frequency of 111.60 at Al Asad airport. This is completely wrong! You should inform also its developer.
Also nice to meet you my friend. I’m not active here the last 3 years after a bad event against me (a stealing of my work by a loser), so don’t expect new works by me here!
BUT if you want any good advice about your works in the specific sector, my pleasure to help and talk with you.
Keep your good work, you will create even better. I’m sure.
Nikos. -
I am saddened to see that your work has been usurped. This is totally unacceptable.
I hope you will one day reconsider your return. Your work is so appreciated by the majority of this community.Whenever I make a reference to your work, I always take care to include your name (source of the document). I think that’s the least we can do. Thank you again for your support and all that you have achieved over the past eight years. Much appreciated.
Having a mentor is always a good idea.