GEMFX - bring the visuals of BMS to the next level! :)
-
My problem is how incredibly rude people are being about the mod. End of the day if you donât like it thatâs fine, but words like âcrapâ and ânot realisticâ arenât productive for an addons development and people should be grateful that others in the community are willing to put time in to developing addons. Might be why the addon community of falcon isnât bigger if this is how theyâre received by those who fly BMS. So please if you donât like an addon so be it, no need to attack this addon itâs not a big deal and if you donât want to use the script DONT and if it adds effects that some players might want for their experience so be it. Unbelievable.
-
My problem is how incredibly rude people are being about the mod. End of the day if you donât like it thatâs fine, but words like âcrapâ and ânot realisticâ arenât productive for an addons development and people should be grateful that others in the community are willing to put time in to developing addons.
1st ⌠this is not an âAdd-Onâ.
2nd ⌠anybody can give his opinion without being rude towards someone. It is the case here.
3rd ⌠We (BMS team members) are spending a huge amount of time trying to make BMS the most realistic sim ever ⌠hence, when someone is coming with something and sell it as âthe solution to make BMS betterâ ⌠we have the right to give our POV about the stuff.
4th ⌠Welcome in Falcon world.Unbelievable.
-
This post is deleted! -
This post is deleted! -
Gents - just let it go. This isnât even a Falcon specific mod created by a member of this community⌠itâs for any game. People are entitled to like it or hate it, but keep the comments targeted towards the sim/mod, and not the people giving their opinions.
-
My problem is how incredibly rude people are being about the mod. End of the day if you donât like it thatâs fine, but words like âcrapâ and ânot realisticâ arenât productive for an addons development and people should be grateful that others in the community are willing to put time in to developing addons. Might be why the addon community of falcon isnât bigger if this is how theyâre received by those who fly BMS. So please if you donât like an addon so be it, no need to attack this addon itâs not a big deal and if you donât want to use the script DONT and if it adds effects that some players might want for their experience so be it. Unbelievable.
Sorry, but I think the stock BMS looks better. I didnât read all the post, so I donât know what everyone else said, but I donât think I was rude about it. Itâs not my cup of tea and I think stock BMS looks better.
-
Your right Cali but when someone starts a thread with GEMFX - bring the visuals of BMS to the next level! expectations are set. And its all down hill from there.
And like they say âif you canât stand the heat get out of Kuwaitâ ( or was that kitchen )
-
LOL a gfx enhancements or modification tool became a big issue.
Respect wise I believe itâs an overkill. And I mean that from all Aâs as Aâs=aspects.If the title of the thread is wrong or misleading a mod could kindly ask the Op and just change it⌠No need to take it further and go eating our flesh here.
So are we going to make it a bigger issue?
-
-
Incredibly rude responses by some in the community here. Given how flexible the program is, that ALL the graphics options are entirely selectable (even the lens flare, as iâve said before⌠smh) and the communityâs support for SweetFX, I thought theyâd be taking to GEMFX like a duck to water. Apparently not⌠how sad
Thereâs nothing misleading about the title, BMSâs graphics are very basic and visually unrealistic compared to todays standards. Essentially GEMFX simulates DX10 shader effects in DX9 games
The only thing misleading is that certain members are making the case against the mod without actually trying it and using it. Theyâre basing their judgment off my early screenshots of the mod and that is where you fail in your arguments. Point being, if youâre going to debate or argue against something, make sure your knowledge about that very thing youâre arguing against is rock solid beforehand. Doing otherwise is where you display ignorance for all to see. Too bad you canât delete your posts now, so a nice long slow clap to those that committed this basic fallacy of logical reasoning.
As for myself I think this is where iâm going to leave the BMS community for good. Too often I see certain key members making rude remarks over the contributions of others, getting into pathetic pissing competitions over petty, minute issues (like the boring old DCS vs BMS debates, etc) that, personally, I have better things in my life to devote my time to. Itâs lame. I choose not to take part of and be a member of that group and relevant mentality
To those that have been pleasant and respectful towards me during my time here, thank you for your maturity. If the moderators could delete my account, iâd be much appreciative.
All the best
-
Bye , bye
-And i allready tested this btw⌠Same as sweetfx , just adds AFTER effects to picture, no real fixes (low lod models are still low lod, low res textures are still low res etc) , its just makes image more messy, sure if thats enough for you fine But donât come say that it will make bms Graphics next level, real time potoshop is still just photo shop. You canât make old whore more pretty , no mater how much make up you have
-
Yeap really nice⌠Outcome⌠Well done by all of us.
And irony? Bye bye? And smile? -
Yeap really nice⌠Outcome⌠Well done by all of us.
And irony? Bye bye? And smile?Just go after him :rofl:
-
Incredibly rude responses by some in the community here. Given how flexible the program is, that ALL the graphics options are entirely selectable (even the lens flare, as iâve said before⌠smh) and the communityâs support for SweetFX, I thought theyâd be taking to GEMFX like a duck to water. Apparently not⌠how sad
Thereâs nothing misleading about the title, BMSâs graphics are very basic and visually unrealistic compared to todays standards. Essentially GEMFX simulates DX10 shader effects in DX9 games
The only thing misleading is that certain members are making the case against the mod without actually trying it and using it. Theyâre basing their judgment off my early screenshots of the mod and that is where you fail in your arguments. Point being, if youâre going to debate or argue against something, make sure your knowledge about that very thing youâre arguing against is rock solid beforehand. Doing otherwise is where you display ignorance for all to see. Too bad you canât delete your posts now, so a nice long slow clap to those that committed this basic fallacy of logical reasoning.
As for myself I think this is where iâm going to leave the BMS community for good. Too often I see certain key members making rude remarks over the contributions of others, getting into pathetic pissing competitions over petty, minute issues (like the boring old DCS vs BMS debates, etc) that, personally, I have better things in my life to devote my time to. Itâs lame. I choose not to take part of and be a member of that group and relevant mentality
To those that have been pleasant and respectful towards me during my time here, thank you for your maturity. If the moderators could delete my account, iâd be much appreciative.
All the best
Its amusing that you thought there was a difference between this and SweetFX, Im pretty sure certain key members made exactly the same comments about SweetFX and for exactly the same reasons.
Its ironic that you would try to call out others for displaying ignorance in their reasoning and arguments, for the above reason.
Wish you the best Shadowblade, dont let the doors hit you on the way out.
-
Iâve always appreciated gestures of people who enjoy sharing personal work or even new utilities with all members of this community, and my believe is that everyone should be thankful for that kind of gesture, even if the product doesnât fit their needs.
The gesture itself from Shadowblade deserve a thanks, IMHO, not this kind of criticism and arrogance that some post.
But weâre used to see this kind of bullshit in our everyday life, arenât we?
-
What a drama!?!
Personally, please accept my apologies if I was rude with Shadowblade, but I donât think I was rude with him. I just gave my POV about SweetFx and GemFx for BMS. That is all.
Then came Redshift20.
So now, we are not 8 years old peoples , so we are not gonna cry because someone if not fully in love with something.
How many ppl are criticizing the BMS teamâs work, policy and management decisions (Including Shadowblade who should remember the PM he sent me a long time ago ⌠I didnât cried and just made an answer that was on the same level.) âŚBut it has nothing to do with this here. Point me please where I (we) were impolite or rude ⌠(are you meaning my âjokeâ about fingerprint on the screen? (not really a joke actually because I really thought that is was a picture of a dirty screen taken with a camera))
Otherwise, please accept ppl remarks ⌠I am telling you that I tried it, we thank you again for info and heads up. But I still do not see the real point of this GemFx. Period.
If you like it ⌠nobody prevent anyone to use it.
Is it possible to move on now?
Thread is still open, do not hesitate to post screenshots showing all the possibilities of the âmodâ. Why not ⌠maybe some of us will change their minds about it!(?)
-
Im in agreement with you for the most part Deejay. It is then with all due respect that I would comment briefly that private messages and their contents ought remain private unless the members involved consented to their being made public.
With that said, I second the move, to move on.
-
It is then with all due respect that I would comment briefly that private messages and their contents ought remain private unless the members involved consented to their being made public.
Agree an I plea guilty. But the PM wasnât for me (Dee-Jay) it was directed to BMS Team (public face of the team), and contents remains private. So to say, his victim post above accusing some of us to be always the aggressor is not really appropriate.
However, you are right ⌠Editing my post above.
-
Too often I see certain key members making rude remarks over the contributions of others, getting into pathetic pissing competitions over petty, minute issues (like the boring old DCS vs BMS debates, etc) that, personally, I have better things in my life to devote my time to. Itâs lame. I choose not to take part of and be a member of that group and relevant mentality
Before leaving, if you are still here, please ⌠just to be honest with the audience, find and point me a thread or a single post from a BMS member bashing a DCS product.
As per rude remarks ⌠please point a single rude a remark from a BMS member against a BMS contributor.
(unless by âkey membersâ you are not talking about BM members)
-
What a drama!?!
Personally, please accept my apologies if I was rude with Shadowblade, but I donât think I was rude with him. I just gave my POV about SweetFx and GemFx for BMS. That is all.
Actually, I wasnât pointing my statement to your posts, Dee-Jay. I was referring to the comments Iâve seen since the beginning of this thread posted by Haukka81, for instance. Everyone has his own way of contributing to the enrichment of the community, I guessâŚ
And I donât believe Shadowblade was referring to BM members when he said âkey membersâ also. Moving on nowâŚ