GEMFX - bring the visuals of BMS to the next level! :)
-
Yeap really nice… Outcome… Well done by all of us.
And irony? Bye bye? And smile? -
Yeap really nice… Outcome… Well done by all of us.
And irony? Bye bye? And smile?Just go after him :rofl:
-
Incredibly rude responses by some in the community here. Given how flexible the program is, that ALL the graphics options are entirely selectable (even the lens flare, as i’ve said before… smh) and the community’s support for SweetFX, I thought they’d be taking to GEMFX like a duck to water. Apparently not… how sad
There’s nothing misleading about the title, BMS’s graphics are very basic and visually unrealistic compared to todays standards. Essentially GEMFX simulates DX10 shader effects in DX9 games
The only thing misleading is that certain members are making the case against the mod without actually trying it and using it. They’re basing their judgment off my early screenshots of the mod and that is where you fail in your arguments. Point being, if you’re going to debate or argue against something, make sure your knowledge about that very thing you’re arguing against is rock solid beforehand. Doing otherwise is where you display ignorance for all to see. Too bad you can’t delete your posts now, so a nice long slow clap to those that committed this basic fallacy of logical reasoning.
As for myself I think this is where i’m going to leave the BMS community for good. Too often I see certain key members making rude remarks over the contributions of others, getting into pathetic pissing competitions over petty, minute issues (like the boring old DCS vs BMS debates, etc) that, personally, I have better things in my life to devote my time to. It’s lame. I choose not to take part of and be a member of that group and relevant mentality
To those that have been pleasant and respectful towards me during my time here, thank you for your maturity. If the moderators could delete my account, i’d be much appreciative.
All the best
Its amusing that you thought there was a difference between this and SweetFX, Im pretty sure certain key members made exactly the same comments about SweetFX and for exactly the same reasons.
Its ironic that you would try to call out others for displaying ignorance in their reasoning and arguments, for the above reason.
Wish you the best Shadowblade, dont let the doors hit you on the way out.
-
I’ve always appreciated gestures of people who enjoy sharing personal work or even new utilities with all members of this community, and my believe is that everyone should be thankful for that kind of gesture, even if the product doesn’t fit their needs.
The gesture itself from Shadowblade deserve a thanks, IMHO, not this kind of criticism and arrogance that some post.
But we’re used to see this kind of bullshit in our everyday life, aren’t we?
-
What a drama!?!
Personally, please accept my apologies if I was rude with Shadowblade, but I don’t think I was rude with him. I just gave my POV about SweetFx and GemFx for BMS. That is all.
Then came Redshift20.
So now, we are not 8 years old peoples , so we are not gonna cry because someone if not fully in love with something.
How many ppl are criticizing the BMS team’s work, policy and management decisions (Including Shadowblade who should remember the PM he sent me a long time ago … I didn’t cried and just made an answer that was on the same level.) …But it has nothing to do with this here. Point me please where I (we) were impolite or rude … (are you meaning my “joke” about fingerprint on the screen? (not really a joke actually because I really thought that is was a picture of a dirty screen taken with a camera))
Otherwise, please accept ppl remarks … I am telling you that I tried it, we thank you again for info and heads up. But I still do not see the real point of this GemFx. Period.
If you like it … nobody prevent anyone to use it.
Is it possible to move on now?
Thread is still open, do not hesitate to post screenshots showing all the possibilities of the “mod”. Why not … maybe some of us will change their minds about it!(?)
-
Im in agreement with you for the most part Deejay. It is then with all due respect that I would comment briefly that private messages and their contents ought remain private unless the members involved consented to their being made public.
With that said, I second the move, to move on.
-
It is then with all due respect that I would comment briefly that private messages and their contents ought remain private unless the members involved consented to their being made public.
Agree an I plea guilty. But the PM wasn’t for me (Dee-Jay) it was directed to BMS Team (public face of the team), and contents remains private. So to say, his victim post above accusing some of us to be always the aggressor is not really appropriate.
However, you are right … Editing my post above.
-
Too often I see certain key members making rude remarks over the contributions of others, getting into pathetic pissing competitions over petty, minute issues (like the boring old DCS vs BMS debates, etc) that, personally, I have better things in my life to devote my time to. It’s lame. I choose not to take part of and be a member of that group and relevant mentality
Before leaving, if you are still here, please … just to be honest with the audience, find and point me a thread or a single post from a BMS member bashing a DCS product.
As per rude remarks … please point a single rude a remark from a BMS member against a BMS contributor.
(unless by “key members” you are not talking about BM members)
-
What a drama!?!
Personally, please accept my apologies if I was rude with Shadowblade, but I don’t think I was rude with him. I just gave my POV about SweetFx and GemFx for BMS. That is all.
Actually, I wasn’t pointing my statement to your posts, Dee-Jay. I was referring to the comments I’ve seen since the beginning of this thread posted by Haukka81, for instance. Everyone has his own way of contributing to the enrichment of the community, I guess…
And I don’t believe Shadowblade was referring to BM members when he said “key members” also. Moving on now…
-
As for myself I think this is where i’m going to leave the BMS community for good. Too often I see certain key members making rude remarks over the contributions of others, getting into pathetic pissing competitions over petty, minute issues (like the boring old DCS vs BMS debates, etc) that, personally, I have better things in my life to devote my time to. It’s lame. I choose not to take part of and be a member of that group and relevant mentality
Are we living in the same universe…?
-
And the pimple is ready to burst finally.
-
Just go after him :rofl:
Always nice to be optimistic. :lol:
Just please don’t hold your breath. -
Oh and historical data when releases are on long time frames the drama raises.
-
Also historical data when the drama reaches it’s peak release is near.
Feels like dejavu -
I confirm I see no real decisive improvements (played with many parameters) …
And it cost me between 15FPS to 35FPS
GEMFX OFF
GEMFX ON (minimal settings and shaders applied)
…
GEM FX OFF
GEM FX ON
… Giving up evaluation on my side. Definitively pointless for me in my use of BMS.