Future and evolution: bms 5.0 like 5 generation??
-
Not planed and not about to happen. Radium is right, core is not the only issue anyway.
-
Of course. But there is not external plugins dictating the structure of that core. Yes, that core would require modification. No, its not impossible to modify that.
Are you related to SkyMan or TagKnight ? Distant cousin ? :boink:
……;)
@ koaro, how long did it take to write that post, I’m impressed.
Good Hunting mate.
-
Sure, but there is a difference between not planned, and not physically possible.
Its not physically possible to write software that makes the user feel the sensations of G forces, for example. You need special hardware for it - its physically impossible to just code it.
Modifying source code to change the way things look, much more possible.
-
Sure, but there is a difference between not planned, and not physically possible.
Its not physically possible to write software that makes the user feel the sensations of G forces, for example. You need special hardware for it - its physically impossible to just code it.
Modifying source code to change the way things look, much more possible.
In my very humble opinion you just want to be said to be right.
In fact, you just haven’t read what was said before. Of course you can modifiy the core, which may be almost equivalent of rewriting the software.
This is what I said from my very first post. But obviously you haven’t read what I said.
Anyway, I’ll leave it there.
Regards,
Radium
-
In my very humble opinion you just want to be said to be right.
In fact, you just haven’t read what was said before. Of course you can modifiy the core, which may be almost equivalent of rewriting the software.
This is what I said from my very first post. But obviously you haven’t read what I said.
Well, your opinion doesnt change the facts, and I dont depend on you for validation so no, not really.
The discussion was about rewriting the software from the start, so yeah. Obviously we are not on the same page
-
Well, your opinion doesnt change the facts, and I dont depend on you for validation so no, not really.
The discussion was about rewriting the software from the start, so yeah. Obviously we are not on the same page
Where did I even suggested that you needed my clearance to do something? I never wrote or implied something like that. You just stated that you did not read what I said, but you took the right to comment without reading, this is what I call intellectual dishonesty.
-
Where did I even suggested that you needed my clearance to do something? I never wrote or implied something like that.
You say that, but you only just said that:
In my very humble opinion you just want to be said to be right.
Well, your opinion doesnt change the facts, and I dont depend on you for validation so no, not really.
As above.
You just stated that you did not read what I said, but you took the right to comment without reading, this is what I call intellectual dishonesty.
Nowhere have I stated that. That is called outright dishonesty. If anyone has not been reading, it has been you, talking past me.
In fact, you just haven’t read what was said before. Of course you can modifiy the core, which may be almost equivalent of rewriting the software.
This is what I said from my very first post. But obviously you haven’t read what I said.
Well, your opinion doesnt change the facts, and I dont depend on you for validation so no, not really.
The discussion was about rewriting the software from the start, so yeah. Obviously we are not on the same page
Literally your post just before that one, you say I am looking for validation in your opinion, then you ask where I got the idea you suggested that? I can only assume there is some level of language barrier in play, because this is beyond a joke. The only other credible explanation is that you set out to accuse someone of lying, and I happened to be it.
Im curious to see which it is.
-
You know what? I’m not going to feed you here.
People will read if they want to and think what they want about that.
After all, I spent already 30 minutes which are too much for that kind of situation.
Regards,
Radium
-
Have you tried the pilot controlled cruise missiles? This might be a start point for one of your projects.
The one where you said to control the missile from missile view.
I forget the name of the cruise missile and remote control pod needed. But you will want to read all this in the manual before trying it any way.
Only real difference is who will fly the plane when you are driving the missile?
Auto switch to combat pilot mode? Maybe just pilot switch would be easier. -
I think the OP has made his point, received some relevant responses and hopefully understands that Falcon BMS is first and foremost an F-16 simulator.
What the future holds; well I could tell you, but…