[New] F16I Skin Project
-
Well it’s only the Adir… the terrain it self.
the version of the Adir (Terrain) determents the version of the Simulator its in use…
So the pictures are from the Adir 4 - using Falcon 4 BMS… so you can call it Falcon (Adir) 4…
but if you take for example another simulator - let’s say DCS… and you put Adir inside of it - you get DCS 4 (Adir 4)… Sufa 4… and so on…
Adir = Terrain
Sufa = Simulator
Falcon = Falcon
DCS = DCS…
Block II - 2D
BLOCK III - 3D
BLOCK IIII - 4K
and there are two types of simulators :- Regular
- RAS - Realistic Advanced Sim
The RAS types must have Full terrain, and other upgrades - like p3d, xplane, fsx and so on… DCS is not yet RAS because it doesn’t use photoreal terrain - even tho it looks good… it has no meaning to RAS… another example of RAS is ofcourse Lockheed’s Block 70/72 simulator… uses photoreal terrain - 3d ofcourse and its 4k …
Falcon is not yet RAS - Because it doesn’t use full photoreal terrain over few countries… so when I say SUFA (which is RAS) I don’t talk about Falcon bms… (which is a Regular Sim, not RAS yet)
Soooo…. Why are you here?
Clearly you have a far superior product as you are a one man software company the world have never seen…
And you naming scheme is super confusing I suggest you move to emoji based versioning.
You are currently and version .:thumb-down:
-
This post is deleted! -
Well it’s only the Adir… the terrain it self.
the version of the Adir (Terrain) determents the version of the Simulator its in use…
So the pictures are from the Adir 4 - using Falcon 4 BMS… so you can call it Falcon (Adir) 4…
but if you take for example another simulator - let’s say DCS… and you put Adir inside of it - you get DCS 4 (Adir 4)… Sufa 4… and so on…
Adir = Terrain
Sufa = Simulator
Falcon = Falcon
DCS = DCS…
Block II - 2D
BLOCK III - 3D
BLOCK IIII - 4K
and there are two types of simulators :- Regular
- RAS - Realistic Advanced Sim
The RAS types must have Full terrain, and other upgrades - like p3d, xplane, fsx and so on… DCS is not yet RAS because it doesn’t use photoreal terrain - even tho it looks good… it has no meaning to RAS… another example of RAS is ofcourse Lockheed’s Block 70/72 simulator… uses photoreal terrain - 3d ofcourse and its 4k …
Falcon is not yet RAS - Because it doesn’t use full photoreal terrain over few countries… so when I say SUFA (which is RAS) I don’t talk about Falcon bms… (which is a Regular Sim, not RAS yet)
I have saved your post, BTW.
Ok, DCS uses Photorealistic terrain, it’s for your information. -
Ohh… the “Me, Myself and I corporation” again… I almost forgot about that little trick of yours…
Tell the guys I said Hi.
Update
Damn it! I forgot I have to quote that guy… -
Well it’s only the Adir… the terrain it self.
the version of the Adir (Terrain) determents the version of the Simulator its in use…
So the pictures are from the Adir 4 - using Falcon 4 BMS… so you can call it Falcon (Adir) 4…
but if you take for example another simulator - let’s say DCS… and you put Adir inside of it - you get DCS 4 (Adir 4)… Sufa 4… and so on…
Adir = Terrain
Sufa = Simulator
Falcon = Falcon
DCS = DCS…
Block II - 2D
BLOCK III - 3D
BLOCK IIII - 4K
and there are two types of simulators :- Regular
- RAS - Realistic Advanced Sim
The RAS types must have Full terrain, and other upgrades - like p3d, xplane, fsx and so on… DCS is not yet RAS because it doesn’t use photoreal terrain - even tho it looks good… it has no meaning to RAS… another example of RAS is ofcourse Lockheed’s Block 70/72 simulator… uses photoreal terrain - 3d ofcourse and its 4k …
Falcon is not yet RAS - Because it doesn’t use full photoreal terrain over few countries… so when I say SUFA (which is RAS) I don’t talk about Falcon bms… (which is a Regular Sim, not RAS yet)
Falcon = Bird
DCS = Companytststs… The basics man… the basics.
:lol: you could make it even harder…
like you say Adir 4
it should be Adir Knights.4=Knights like the 4 Knights of the Apocalypse…
so it should go
Adir Knights Bird… or Adir Bird Knights or Knights Adir Bird or Bird Knights Adir…hmmm
AKB or ABK or KAB or BKARegular… does it come without alcohol or nicotine free? or we r talking about condoms here? :rofl:
Sorry but it was provoking to be satyr-ed… to much food for it…
come on man with those you diminish your seriousness to absolute zero (-275C). This thing sounds like a joke or a practical joke.
just one last thing… since you started like 4 years ago and maybe completed one year ago? so your photo resources where old in detail and last two - three years details most probably not there, so you must spot the changes and redo those areas.
-
I really shouldn’t be here… I’m here for the fun… that’s gonna be my last post in this forum guys… It was really fun to play with you… I’m sure you can take this simulator into a whole new level… I will keep updated from time to time to see if you got any results and I will give my TIPS if you would like to hear them… cya guys.
By the way… I think it would be nice to share some of my real flights - as Aviation Lover - so that’s my Good Bye Video =]
So you’ve openly admitted you are here simply to troll the forums? Hopefully a moderator will be along shortly to remove your posting privileges… hopefully.
-
Well it’s only the Adir… the terrain it self.
the version of the Adir (Terrain) determents the version of the Simulator its in use…
So the pictures are from the Adir 4 - using Falcon 4 BMS… so you can call it Falcon (Adir) 4…
but if you take for example another simulator - let’s say DCS… and you put Adir inside of it - you get DCS 4 (Adir 4)… Sufa 4… and so on…
Adir = Terrain
Sufa = Simulator
Falcon = Falcon
DCS = DCS…
Block II - 2D
BLOCK III - 3D
BLOCK IIII - 4K
and there are two types of simulators :- Regular
- RAS - Realistic Advanced Sim
The RAS types must have Full terrain, and other upgrades - like p3d, xplane, fsx and so on… DCS is not yet RAS because it doesn’t use photoreal terrain - even tho it looks good… it has no meaning to RAS… another example of RAS is ofcourse Lockheed’s Block 70/72 simulator… uses photoreal terrain - 3d ofcourse and its 4k …
Falcon is not yet RAS - Because it doesn’t use full photoreal terrain over few countries… so when I say SUFA (which is RAS) I don’t talk about Falcon bms… (which is a Regular Sim, not RAS yet)
This whole post leaves me with question marks about your sanity.
-
I really shouldn’t be here… I’m here for the fun… that’s gonna be my last post in this forum guys… It was really fun to play with you… I’m sure you can take this simulator into a whole new level… I will keep updated from time to time to see if you got any results and I will give my TIPS if you would like to hear them… cya guys.
By the way… I think it would be nice to share some of my real flights - as Aviation Lover - so that’s my Good Bye Video =]
Texans@iFly
-
You made the kid disappear and his posts too
-
Well we’re hard audience. If you want to prove something better be prepared.
And no offering, not even how to.
If his case is solid and workable we are all ears and eyes and willing to test and experiment on new stuff. But you have to provide something.
Wasting time just for textures and braking up falcon engine… Well…
If he has it ready, he could record a video and share his hw specs and fps and falcon engine working as it should on regard to units moving, war, radars, campaigns, TE’s etc.He was jumping from one to the other and he didn’t backed up solidly his case. Like yeap you might lose a or some of a but you gain b.
The only gain here was in some extend full tiles coverage. But on the questions for losses he remained silent or his saying weren’t believable. Losses like vga ram and ram usage, fps, load times, radars operation, terrain masking, units movement…
We enjoy falcon without full tiles unique coverage from the very start, something like that if is workable and feasible would be seriously considered… But…
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-T818A using Tapatalk
-
This is potentially the most childish thread on this forum. Glad it is done with.
-
This is potentially the most childish thread on this forum. Glad it is done with.
It reeks of deja vu as well. I’m sure there was a very similar guy spouting the same crap a few years back. Wonder if it’s the same guy.
-
It reeks of deja vu as well. I’m sure there was a very similar guy spouting the same crap a few years back. Wonder if it’s the same guy.
It is the same guy.
Historically he would show up every 6 month to a year in a forum (it’s only his second appearance here, but I’ve known him in the Israeli community for years) and start promising wonders.
it started from a DB edit to a pyhton4 missile “to make it more lifelike” (which involved putting in pretty much unlimited thrust motor and a blast radius of a MK84).
later down the road it slowly migrated into his uniquely developed “Barak 2020” flight simulator he wrote himself, without anything to do with falcon… which “somehow” managed to have the exact same DB and data structure of BMS.He was famous for using an alias for posting something “he found online”. then login with a second and sometimes even a third user and start a discussion among himself…
But now, he is here… I really hope that he will be staying away for a while now. (but he will probably be back early 2020)
-
It reeks of deja vu as well. I’m sure there was a very similar guy spouting the same crap a few years back. Wonder if it’s the same guy.
Not sure, but he certainly picked the wrong group of guys to bullshit with.
-
It is the same guy.
Historically he would show up every 6 month to a year in a forum (it’s only his second appearance here, but I’ve known him in the Israeli community for years) and start promising wonders.
it started from a DB edit to a pyhton4 missile “to make it more lifelike” (which involved putting in pretty much unlimited thrust motor and a blast radius of a MK84).
later down the road it slowly migrated into his uniquely developed “Barak 2020” flight simulator he wrote himself, without anything to do with falcon… which “somehow” managed to have the exact same DB and data structure of BMS.He was famous for using an alias for posting something “he found online”. then login with a second and sometimes even a third user and start a discussion among himself…
But now, he is here… I really hope that he will be staying away for a while now. (but he will probably be back early 2020)
Yeah that sounds familar over the last few years… The Internet really is a vile place. I’ll never understand why society has deemed it normal to use the Internet as a place to bully people ‘anonymously’. Facebook, YouTube, Reddit; horrid horrid places to be at times.
You’d think coming to a mature flight sim community you’d be clear of such childish trolling behaviour; this isn’t exactly a public board for CoD or Fortnite kiddies. The mind does boggle.
-
Yeah that sounds familar over the last few years… The Internet really is a vile place. I’ll never understand why society has deemed it normal to use the Internet as a place to bully people ‘anonymously’. Facebook, YouTube, Reddit; horrid horrid places to be at times.
You’d think coming to a mature flight sim community you’d be clear of such childish trolling behaviour; this isn’t exactly a public board for CoD or Fortnite kiddies. The mind does boggle.
That’s because society is full of pussies who act tuff behind a keyboard.
-
That’s because society is full of pussies who act tuff behind a keyboard.
True, but thankfully we can spot them a mile off nowadays
-
You’d think coming to a mature flight sim community you’d be clear of such childish trolling behaviour…
Indeed…! Well said, Haz’. “Childishness”…!!
I mean - who in their right mind would come to a mature flight sim community and exhibit childishness…!!! It’s… it’s just… it’s… so…
It’s…
I mean… kinda’… I… er…
Carry on. Nothing to see here.
Ara’