Test low-poly toys in BMS4..
-
more test on ground vehicles…the dynamic shadow is sweet… check the turret and gun barrel shadow on the chiasis.
the second one has old fixed shadow node.
-
When we will have theese 3D models included in BMS DB ???
It is a must to have !!! Look at that boats, and vehicles etc … !!!
-
+1
karadi
-
When we will have theese 3D models included in BMS DB ???
It is a must to have !!! Look at that boats, and vehicles etc … !!!
There needs to be a group (BMS or community based) actively working to incorporate all these models.
Perhaps you can pull some strings?
-
Sorry to throw a damper on the excitement of getting a bunch of new models into the BMS DB.
WHY don’t WE focus on making the theaters that are available as good as possible??? The ones that you can download are riddled with issues.
We have theaters that are out here where you BLOW up when you enter the 3D(airbases not leveled correctly, the point of Falcon is to take off, who in their right mind would release a theater where you could “NOT TAKEOFF”:rolleyes: and in their release notes say “Choose another airbase” LMAO), skins don’t fit the aircraft(Do it yourself in PS), water shaders are not implemented, carriers are bogus(couldn’t figure it out). Theaters that don’t have the team relations correct. Objectives that aren’t even named, etc, etc. Why is this half-baked stuff even released???
Everyone is in such a hurry to pump “GARBAGE” out. Why don’t you/we take a lesson from the BMS team and take your time to get stuff right. Sure there are problems still in BMS but it’s the MOST stable version of Falcon ever released, “BAR NONE”.
Take your time and get your stuff RIGHT, then you can look at adding “EYE CANDY”.
Although I applaud ccc for his work and contributions to Falcon, I’m dismayed at this thread and the unintentional side effects it has on the public to believe any of it is going to be included in anything as “SOON AS POSSIBLE”.:rolleyes:
RAM22
-
well are those already in BMS? If not maybe they should be packed and released?
-
well are those already in BMS? If not maybe they should be packed and released?
No, they are not.
We have ENUFF’ unfinished business in the DB’s as it is.
If\When CCC is done,I am sure he will put them out for further development.Then other’s can help him\us to implement them CORRECTLY in the DB’s.Since I have been relieved of my Libya Theater terrain\campain’ dutie’s,I have begun to go through THAT Theater Specific DB and correct as many error’s as I can.(100+)
Will it fly without this excercise……Yes.
Will it fly BETTER with the correction’s…Absoloutly!!!demer
-
Although I applaud ccc for his work and contributions to Falcon, I’m dismayed at this thread and the unintentional side effects it has on the public to believe any of it is going to be included in anything as “SOON AS POSSIBLE”.:rolleyes:
RAM22 is right… this thread is not to mislead the public that ppl can have them in a working mod in near future.
Actually this thread serves more as a reminder for me, maybe some theater/DB builders, that we’ve a dream since 10+ years ago.BTW…thanks to BMS LOD DB, replacing/appending new models is quite easy… DB editors can easily upgrade some existing models without affecting data part, like G-4 galeb, CV Kuznestov, BCGN kirov, etc, for theater use.
So… i think some toys are not that far from users. -
that we’ve a dream since 10+ years ago.
And that’s exactly the reason I have your model pack. In time, not tomorrow, not Christmas, not anytime that I can say, but I WILL use some of your work, in the future and put it where it deserves to be.
I’m in no hurry, just as you’re not, your patience is without doubt. It will get there soon enough.
Tks ccc,
RAM22
-
Hi all,
Wow, I dont think I have visited this thread nice very promising.
All that detail on carriers will look awesome.
It is worth the wait!
2012+++ looks very nice!
Thanks BMS,
TAGMAN
-
Perhaps you can pull some strings?
I can’t … I will be not available during January and February … due to military deployment.
-
during my carrier landing test, i found a view bug… when i landed the ac on the deck, use " ` " satellite view to check, i found the ac is about x2 bigger… make the carrier looks really small! Instead i use “8” or “0” view to check my ac on the deck, the size is correct. (the top pic is correct size, skyhawk on argentina carrier)
-
-
-
Maybe a rude question, but what is the point of this thread? Even in PMC I never undersant your thread. You showed many many LODs, that mostly never find their way into any DB. (I used some in MolnyFalcon by the help of 611-Eagle.)
So far, this thread achieve to make me cry everytime I open it… Why? Because my guess even the AC that exist in DB and just have to be replaced with a better LOD, won’t get it. Yes, in some cases they requires new skin because they current skin has FF origins, but I cannot see the problem…
-
Maybe a rude question, but what is the point of this thread?
For me, I love seeing threads like this. It shows how Falcon has developed over the years it’s been out. It demonstrates the countless hours spent by modelers and skinners poured into something they love doing.
It inspires some to create, it inspires others to see what can be improved.
Mostly, it’s just a kick to see how the new rendering engine makes these models come alive.
-
I don’t know but I like watching good models in a a good game.
-
Maybe a rude question, but what is the point of this thread?
I have seen many of these 3D models PMC forum and I have only seen pictures and more pictures but never any LODs and skins pack to install…
-
thanks PH. that’s it.
Acutally my own dream has come true to some extent- creating new 3d model and making them fly in falcon/combat flight sim world. Now ppl want a complete, working package… that’s far beyond my reach. go ask DB masters, or learn to do it.BTW i’d like to thank Ranger for his FF/ITO2 work…the mod uses a lot of my low-poly toys…
-
start korea 50-60 test…