F16V (Block 70)
-
This is what an AESA radar can perform…
This is specific to the F-35 aesa radar ONLY, F-16V aesa scan works in a totally different way.
-
This is specific to the F-35 aesa radar ONLY, F-16V aesa scan works in a totally different way.
The working principles of radar types are based on physics which is not different for different AESA radars…
-
And I ask again, what can we see on the screen different than now? We can increase the antenna scanning speed and bars to detect more targets faster and we are almost done to be acting the new radar version.
An AESA radar is lot more that if you wish to REALLY wish to model and not just mimic its one feature.
-
The working principles of radar types are based on physics which is not different for different AESA radars…
I’m always amazed at how your opinions or ideas are the truth by which everyone else has to stand. And I’m even more surprised that someone with such strong opinions as you and such amount of knowledge you don’t provide yourself with your own F-16A. Some will say that you provided the community with advanced work that benefit all of us, but I ma really admirative of how you can’t stand anyone not thinking like you and forbid that person has not the arguments that are satisfying in your book. Someone with so much knowledge as you shouldn’t even waste time here. Your time.
-
I’m always amazed at how your opinions or ideas are the truth by which everyone else has to stand. And I’m even more surprised that someone with such strong opinions as you and such amount of knowledge you don’t provide yourself with your own F-16A. Some will say that you provided the community with advanced work that benefit all of us, but I ma really admirative of how you can’t stand anyone not thinking like you and forbid that person has not the arguments that are satisfying in your book. Someone with so much knowledge as you shouldn’t even waste time here. Your time.
Physics is not a matter of opinion…
I can’t do 3D modeling. I tried in 2007 and I found it hard therefore I focused different areas of the sim. This is why looks as the BMS4.35 what you can see regarding of many SAM modeling values and features. -
Molnibalage and his SAM, data change topic. every time when you can’t say something for the current topic, or you don’t have right, bring an other topic (like szu-27 cockpit) or like now the SAM’s data. Just to be polish your ego.
in the virtual place, there is no physics, everything works as the programmer want.
So if they want to move the block 50’s radar dish so fast and ways like the AESA can, then they will.
If they don’t want to recreate the whole system bit by bit just to work like a real one , they can do some cheat .
if they want put 100 normal radardish in one place and all of them can move differently. there is no physical obsticle, they will fit inside the nosecone. -
Physics is not a matter of opinion…
I can’t do 3D modeling. I tried in 2007 and I found it hard therefore I focused different areas of the sim. This is why looks as the BMS4.35 what you can see regarding of many SAM modeling values and features.Physics are not a matter of opinion…
This is surprising to read this, perhaps you never heard about debates about scientific publications. But this is another story.
You indeed rightly have opinions. Please remember than a statement is not a proof. considering than F-16A is closer to F-16C52 than F-16C52 is from F-16V is your very own opinion, which I disagree.
This why scientific facts are always checked numerous times my peers, before getting a consensus. You can be the most talented physician, your publications will be checked and rechecked.
The problem is that the engine is not suitable for this.
I have explained tons of times this.This kind of statement is your opinion. We may agree or disagree you.
You may explain it thousand, million or even billions time it doesn’t really matter : it’s not because you said it that it is true.
Therefore, we can humbly disagree your point of view, like Canuck did.
-
The problem is that the engine is not suitable for this.
I have explained tons of times this.Even the older SAM are modeled a single mode generalized SAMs and jamming is literally just a two variable thing as I know.
The aspect and ECM modifier determines the track capability or radars and likely the effect of the chaff. When in reality was useless even against the SA-5 and SA-6…
Even against the SA-2/3 just made impossible the autotrack but manual tracking worked even without the need of three point guidance.
The F-16V, F-35 and every latest fighters have so many sensors and features which are not modeled even for an AI and not for players.
- ESA type radars (which can be PESA or AESA)
- MAWS
- Different data links
- Towed decoy
- Different ECM suit
- Different size of flare
Even the effect is SOJ in not visible on the RWR…
Even the sim. eng. capability of the MiG-31 is not modeled and can’t shoot down any plane any CM only ships and SAMs can do it.So if you are really speaking about “folks want to simulate modern day fighter piloting” I can state, they never will get it. Because it means so large task.
Because even the old tech can’t be simulated properly only with a very strong abstraction. BMS4 is a very high level hobby project but as everything it has its own limits.
Can you guess how could be simulated the system which are classfied and far more complex than ever was the SA-2/3/5/6 or just SA-10B or SA-11…?While for '80s we need only F-16A pit and that is it.
And it would mean a far better abstraction than a funny Block 70.So if you ask me the it would be better to stick to '90s and '80s. It mean better abstraction, we have sources about stuff from that era and it is far easier to do that. And it is more fun.
Because of the lack of shiny electronics and lack of a “complete” SA when only radar, RWR and eyeballs were available game play wise that ere is simply more fun.
In RL in many theaters even the BVR capability was limited or lower quality where the F-4 meant the BVR not the F-15 or F-18 or F-14.- If you ask me there is 0 fun in combat which means lofting ARH guided missiles against the same opponent then you fly home because going close it is simple suicidal.
- Also the ATO can’t handle such systems like the Buk-M1 (SA-11) and S-300PS/PM (SA-10B). It is not sent against them lots of SEAD planes from different direction.
- The AI also can’t handle the SA-10B. It simply massacre the planes - I have no tested the Patriot - because it simply can’t interpret what means if an SA-10B goes active… When a fire control radar of a TVM/SAGG SAM goes active in 99% of cases mean missiles are on way. But the AI simply does not care.
I have to say I’m pretty sad that such things have to be explained again and again.
Of course you can dream about the “modern day fighter piloting” just you and everybody had to be understood what it would really mean and why you can’t have them.
Even such thing is classified as the distance between the ALE-50/55 and the plane which uses it…
Good luck for the proper modeling of the n+1 missing things.Dude, get off your high horse, you don’t have to explain anything. If you want to fly bms as an 80’s sim, by all means go do that. I’ll enjoy the way I want to fly it. Don’t tell me how I should enjoy flying the sim/F-16. Of course there are limits to simulating modern day, I get that. I have a pretty good understanding of aviation and military systems. You don’t have to explain that to me. But the 80’s would still have limits as well. It’s not as simple as creating an F-16A cockpit and voila you have a 100% realistic flightsim. That’s BS.
And I wasn’t talking about the F-16V. I was saying give the block30 a bit of love to bring it more to today’s standard.
If you ask me there is 0 fun in combat which means lofting ARH guided missiles against the same opponent then you fly home because going close it is simple suicidal.
Yeah, the 80’s were so much better… good fun flying an AIM-9 only equipped Viper against a pair of Phoenix equipped F-14’s… dodge 8 Phoenix, bingo fuel and go home… see how easy it is to make such statements?
-
c next post, sorry
-
Yes everything what we need is already in the BMS to look like an Block 70 version, . only one thing is missing , the 3d cockpit inside the game.
And if there is nothing to change in the system but it has a feeling to use a more modern version of F16 than before.
And As I said, if it is happened , it can be improve further.My pit before the ATD, which btw also runs on yame64, absolutely awesome. And I don’t give a sh#t if it doesn’t match the real world exactly. 8-)
Together the ATD with the CPD, it seems a match made in heaven.